Tests – · none yet Owners 34 · 278 reviews
“Tesla model y tire HP71 crugen on tirerack is offering $80 rebate per tire.”
Head-to-head
Updated
Kumho Crugen HP71 vs Kumho PorTran KC53 — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 278 + 287 owner reviews. How we score
PorTran KC53 is ahead, 63–46
Add your size for an exact match
/R
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests – · none yet Owners 60 · 287 reviews
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
44
Dry
PorTran KC53 +1963Why this score
Source Crugen HP71 PorTran KC53 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 52 (est.) ≈ 65 (est.) Reviews found online 31 61 Crugen HP71: 60% × 52.4 (est.) + 40% × 30.5 = 44
PorTran KC53: 60% × 65 (est.) + 40% × 60.8 = 63
No road tests of dry for Crugen HP71. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).
No road tests of dry for PorTran KC53. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).
-
51
Wet
PorTran KC53 +1465Why this score
Source Crugen HP71 PorTran KC53 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 56 (est.) ≈ 66 (est.) Reviews found online 44 63 Crugen HP71: 60% × 56 (est.) + 40% × 43.9 = 51
PorTran KC53: 60% × 66.4 (est.) + 40% × 62.8 = 65
No road tests of wet for Crugen HP71. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
No road tests of wet for PorTran KC53. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
-
53
Snow
No comparison–Why this score
Source Crugen HP71 PorTran KC53 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 61 (est.) – Reviews found online 41 – Crugen HP71: 60% × 61.1 (est.) + 40% × 40.8 = 53
No road tests of snow for Crugen HP71. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).
-
44
Comfort
PorTran KC53 +1458Why this score
Source Crugen HP71 PorTran KC53 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 61 (est.) ≈ 65 (est.) Reviews found online 32 53 Crugen HP71: 40% × 61.2 (est.) + 60% × 32.1 = 44
PorTran KC53: 40% × 65.4 (est.) + 60% × 52.6 = 58
No road tests of comfort for Crugen HP71. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.21).
No road tests of comfort for PorTran KC53. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.21).
-
54
Noise
No comparison–Why this score
Source Crugen HP71 PorTran KC53 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 66 (est.) – Reviews found online 36 – Crugen HP71: 60% × 66.3 (est.) + 40% × 35.5 = 54
No road tests of noise for Crugen HP71. The test half is the tested tires’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
37
Treadwear
PorTran KC53 +2461Why this score
Source Crugen HP71 PorTran KC53 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 49 (est.) ≈ 63 (est.) Reviews found online 18 57 Crugen HP71: 60% × 49.3 (est.) + 40% × 18.4 = 37
PorTran KC53: 60% × 63.1 (est.) + 40% × 57 = 61
No road tests of treadwear for Crugen HP71. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
No road tests of treadwear for PorTran KC53. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
-
51
Handling (owners)
PorTran KC53 +960Why this score
Source Crugen HP71 PorTran KC53 Reviews found online 51 60
Scores at a glance
| Category | Kumho Crugen HP71 | Kumho PorTran KC53 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 46 | 63 |
| Dry | 44 | 63 |
| Wet | 51 | 65 |
| Snow | 53 | – |
| Comfort | 44 | 58 |
| Noise | 54 | – |
| Treadwear | 37 | 61 |
| Handling (owners) | 51 | 60 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score
46
/ 100
Crugen HP71
63
/ 100
PorTran KC53
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
The professional test results behind the scores
Per discipline: the average % of the best tire over every test both tires were in, and how many of those tests each one won. “Different tests” rows compare results from separate tests.
| Discipline | Category | Crugen HP71 | PorTran KC53 | Δ | Head-to-head |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Also published by the testers (not in the score) | |||||
| Overall Ranking | Overall | #8/9 2021 Teknikens Värld Summer Tire Test R18 | #7/16 2019 ADAC Van 215/65 R16 C Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A Crugen HP71
Pros
- Strong value: frequently described as much cheaper than Michelin, Pirelli or Bridgestone alternatives while not feeling like a budget tire.
- Good wet and heavy-rain traction, with some reports of confident light-snow performance.
- Quiet, smooth ride reported by many owners, often as an improvement over the stock tires (Bridgestone Dueler, Pirelli, Hankook).
Cons
- Premature or uneven tread wear is the most common complaint, with reports of tires worn out at roughly 15,000 to 27,000 miles or within 1.5 years, far below the 65,000-mile rating.
- Road and highway noise, including howling that develops with mileage, reported by several owners.
- Vibration and difficulty keeping the tires balanced, in some cases even after repeated balancing and rotations.
Tire B PorTran KC53
Pros
- Significantly quieter and more refined road noise compared to stock or competitor tires
- Smoother, more forgiving ride quality (frequently noted by motorhome owners)
- Excellent value for money and affordable pricing
Cons
- Occasional wheel spin or reduced forward traction when accelerating quickly in the wet
- Potential for accelerated edge wear under certain loads if pressures are not meticulously managed
- Isolated reports of premature sidewall cracking after a few years
What real owners are saying
From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score
Tire A
Mixed
Kumho Crugen HP71
Community opinions on the Kumho Crugen HP71 (including EV variants) are generally mixed, primarily leaning on price and initial comfort versus longevity. Many users appreciate the affordable pricing, quiet/smooth ride, and good handling, but a significant number report faster-than-expected tread wear and occasional issues with foam lining separation or durability on heavier vehicles.
r/VolvoRecharge
·1 upvote ·2026-10-05
“Kumho Crugen HP71 235/50R19XL 103V BSW ($132.44/each) Total: $264.88 Kumho Crugen EV HP71 255/45R19XL 104V BSW ($287.70/each Gigatires about a month ago I feel like they're just as good as the Continentals that came with the car It's crazy that these EVS have different size tires front and rear, prevents rotating tires for even wear. It's also surprising that the cost difference from the front the rear was so much different. It was also like that with numerous other manufacturers. I also drive about 24,000 mi a year, so we'll see if they hold up.”
r/AskAMechanic
·1 upvote ·2026-07-26
“I need a new tire, right? 215/55R18 Kumho Crugen HP71 tire showing cords on the outer sidewall. I need a new tire, right? Edit: I’m thinking about replacing just this one tire, 2023 CX-30 AWD. Tires were new Oct 2025 and have 7mm tread depth left. According to the spec sheet, this new tire would have 7.9mm of depth. Can I get away with one tire? Edit 2: Existing vs new tires would have ~1mm of difference in tread depth Read more”
r/CadillacLyriq
·4 upvotes ·2026-09-20
“How many miles do you guys get on tires? I had a blowout back in June, and decided to just buy a full set. The shop had a promo on these KumHo Crugen HP71 tires, which had a 65,000 mile warranty. 3 months and 12,000 miles later, my tread is completely gone. I got some Michelins and was credited 185 bucks per tire, but this seems insanely low mileage to wear out the tread completely. I know the added weight and torque of an EV somewhat lowers the lifespan of tires, but even if I was driving like a demon, I don't think 12,000 miles should be anywhere near the lifespan of a reputable brand.”
Top themes
#Affordability and Value#Ride Comfort and Noise#Tread Wear and Longevity#EV Performance and Efficiency#Durability and Quality Issues
Based on 52 community posts
Tire B
Kumho PorTran KC53
We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Kumho Crugen HP71 | B · Kumho PorTran KC53 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer Ultra High Performance tires | Summer Touring tires |
| Vehicle type | SUV and 4x4 | Van |
| Sizes available | 63 | 27 |
| Rim diameters | 16″ – 22″ | 14″ – 18″ |
| Tread depth | 9.9/32″ | — |
| UTQG | 640 A A | — |
| Treadwear warranty | 65,000 mi | — |
| Sidewall | Blackwall | — |
| Max pressure | 51 psi | — |
| Sizes in common | 2 | 2 |
Which one should you actually buy?
46
/ 100
Kumho Crugen HP71
63
/ 100
Kumho PorTran KC53
Winner: Kumho PorTran KC53 — better treadwear, dry and wet. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Pick tire B
You want the longest tread life
Kumho PorTran KC53 scores 61 vs 37 on treadwear.
Pick tire B
You want the most grip on dry roads
Kumho PorTran KC53 scores 63 vs 44 on dry.
Pick tire B
Your priority is wet-weather safety
Kumho PorTran KC53 scores 65 vs 51 on wet.
Pick tire B
You want the most comfortable ride
Kumho PorTran KC53 scores 58 vs 44 on comfort.
Tire A · Kumho Crugen HP71
Tire B · Kumho PorTran KC53
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Crugen HP71 or PorTran KC53?
Which is better in the wet, Crugen HP71 or PorTran KC53?
Kumho PorTran KC53, 65 vs 51 on our wet score.
Which grips better on dry roads, Crugen HP71 or PorTran KC53?
Kumho PorTran KC53, 63 vs 44 on our dry score.
Which is more comfortable, Crugen HP71 or PorTran KC53?
Kumho PorTran KC53, 58 vs 44 on our comfort score.
Which lasts longer, Crugen HP71 or PorTran KC53?
Kumho PorTran KC53, 61 vs 37 on our treadwear score.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology