Tests – · none yet Owners 35 · 275 reviews
“Tesla model y tire HP71 crugen on tirerack is offering $80 rebate per tire.”
Head-to-head
Updated
Kumho Crugen HP71 vs Laufenn S Fit EQ+ — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 11 road tests and 275 + 11 owner reviews. How we score
S Fit EQ+ is ahead, 75–47
Add your size for an exact match
/R
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
44
Dry
S Fit EQ+ +3882Why this score
Source Crugen HP71 S Fit EQ+ Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 10 tests ≈ 53 (est.) 80 Reviews found online 32 85 Crugen HP71: 60% × 52.8 (est.) + 40% × 31.8 = 44
S Fit EQ+: 60% × 79.7 + 40% × 85.2 = 82
No road tests of dry for Crugen HP71. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).
-
52
Wet
S Fit EQ+ +2476Why this score
Source Crugen HP71 S Fit EQ+ Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 11 tests ≈ 56 (est.) 74 Reviews found online 45 79 Crugen HP71: 60% × 56.4 (est.) + 40% × 44.7 = 52
S Fit EQ+: 60% × 73.7 + 40% × 78.5 = 76
No road tests of wet for Crugen HP71. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
-
53
Snow
No comparison–Why this score
Source Crugen HP71 S Fit EQ+ Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 60 (est.) – Reviews found online 42 – Crugen HP71: 60% × 60 (est.) + 40% × 41.9 = 53
No road tests of snow for Crugen HP71. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.37).
-
45
Comfort
S Fit EQ+ +2873Why this score
Source Crugen HP71 S Fit EQ+ Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 2 tests ≈ 63 (est.) 66 Reviews found online 33 78 Crugen HP71: 40% × 62.6 (est.) + 60% × 33.4 = 45
S Fit EQ+: 40% × 66 + 60% × 77.8 = 73
No road tests of comfort for Crugen HP71. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
55
Noise
S Fit EQ+ +1873Why this score
Source Crugen HP71 S Fit EQ+ Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 5 tests ≈ 67 (est.) 77 Reviews found online 37 ≈ 67 (est.) Crugen HP71: 60% × 66.6 (est.) + 40% × 36.7 = 55
S Fit EQ+: 60% × 77.4 + 40% × 66.6 (est.) = 73
No road tests of noise for Crugen HP71. The test half is the tested tires’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.
No owner ratings of noise for S Fit EQ+. The owner half is the owners’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests, so the tests say nothing about how owners would rate it.
-
37
Treadwear
S Fit EQ+ +1956Why this score
Source Crugen HP71 S Fit EQ+ Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 5 tests ≈ 49 (est.) 42 Reviews found online 18 76 Crugen HP71: 60% × 49.5 (est.) + 40% × 18.3 = 37
S Fit EQ+: 60% × 42.1 + 40% × 76.1 = 56
No road tests of treadwear for Crugen HP71. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).
-
52
Handling (owners)
S Fit EQ+ +3284Why this score
Source Crugen HP71 S Fit EQ+ Reviews found online 52 84 -
–
Efficiency
No comparison73Why this score
Source Crugen HP71 S Fit EQ+ Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 6 tests – 73
Scores at a glance
| Category | Kumho Crugen HP71 | Laufenn S Fit EQ+ |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 47 | 75 |
| Dry | 44 | 82 |
| Wet | 52 | 76 |
| Snow | 53 | – |
| Comfort | 45 | 73 |
| Noise | 55 | 73 |
| Treadwear | 37 | 56 |
| Handling (owners) | 52 | 84 |
| Efficiency | – | 73 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Not important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Recomputed
Headline score
47
/ 100
Crugen HP71
75
/ 100
S Fit EQ+
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
The professional test results behind the scores
Per discipline: the average % of the best tire over every test both tires were in, and how many of those tests each one won. “Different tests” rows compare results from separate tests.
| Discipline | Category | Crugen HP71 | S Fit EQ+ | Δ | Head-to-head |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Also published by the testers (not in the score) | |||||
| Overall Ranking | Overall | #8/9 2021 Teknikens Värld Summer Tire Test R18 | #9/10 2026 Auto Zeitung 18 Inch Summer Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A Crugen HP71
Pros
- Affordable pricing compared to premium tier brands
- Quiet and smooth ride quality when new
- Confident wet-weather traction and performance in heavy rain
Cons
- Significantly premature tread wear and short lifespan for many users
- Developing loud road noise or howling as mileage increases
- Balancing issues and vehicle vibrations
Tire B S Fit EQ+
Pros
- Exceptional value and lower price point compared to premium brands
- Strong dry and wet road grip with stable handling
- Good fuel economy and low rolling resistance
Cons
- Increased road noise reported by some users
- Stiffer ride quality or firmness in colder conditions (below 10°C)
- Concerns regarding sidewall stiffness and occasional manufacturing flaws (e.g., a hump in one tire)
What real owners are saying
From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score
Tire A
Mixed
Kumho Crugen HP71
Community sentiment for the Kumho Crugen HP71 (and its EV variant) is mixed, with owners praising its affordability, comfortable ride, and quiet performance on many vehicles. However, a significant number of drivers report disappointingly rapid tread wear—particularly on heavy electric vehicles—as well as occasional noise on coarse surfaces and internal acoustic foam detachment issues.
r/Ioniq5
·1 upvote ·2026-08-30
“The HP71 are actually the OE tire for several trim/MY combinations for the Ioniq 5 and EV6 and they're decent tires. The longest lasting tire is the Defender 2, with the trade off of mediocre traction. I run the Nokian One because it's a batter balance of traction and tread wear than the defender but still quiet and very long-lasting.”
r/CadillacLyriq
·4 upvotes ·2026-09-20
“How many miles do you guys get on tires? I had a blowout back in June, and decided to just buy a full set. The shop had a promo on these KumHo Crugen HP71 tires, which had a 65,000 mile warranty. 3 months and 12,000 miles later, my tread is completely gone. I got some Michelins and was credited 185 bucks per tire, but this seems insanely low mileage to wear out the tread completely. I know the added weight and torque of an EV somewhat lowers the lifespan of tires, but even if I was driving like a demon, I don't think 12,000 miles should be anywhere near the lifespan of a reputable brand.”
r/MechanicAdvice
·2 upvotes ·2019-07-17
“Kumho HP71 vs Continental DWS06 I was planning to get Continentals for $150 each, but then I found these Kumhos for $118 each. The Continentals have a treadwear of 560, whereas the Kumhos have a treadwear of 640. They both have A/A for traction/temp. Is it really worth the extra $128 for brand name if the cheaper ones will outlast them?”
Top themes
#Rapid tread wear#Affordable price value#Cabin noise levels#Ride comfort#EV tire performance#Acoustic foam issues#OEM tire replacement
Based on 51 community posts
Tire B
Laufenn S Fit EQ+
We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Kumho Crugen HP71 | B · Laufenn S Fit EQ+ |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer Ultra High Performance tires | Summer |
| Vehicle type | SUV and 4x4 | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | 63 | 74 |
| Rim diameters | 16″ – 22″ | 15″ – 20″ |
| Tread depth | 9.9/32″ | — |
| UTQG | 640 A A | — |
| Treadwear warranty | 65,000 mi | — |
| Sidewall | Blackwall | — |
| Max pressure | 51 psi | — |
| Sizes in common | 21 | 21 |
Which one should you actually buy?
47
/ 100
Kumho Crugen HP71
75
/ 100
Laufenn S Fit EQ+
Winner: Laufenn S Fit EQ+ — better dry, handling and comfort. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Pick tire B
You want the most grip on dry roads
Laufenn S Fit EQ+ scores 82 vs 44 on dry.
Pick tire B
You enjoy sharp, responsive handling
Laufenn S Fit EQ+ scores 84 vs 52 on handling.
Pick tire B
You want the most comfortable ride
Laufenn S Fit EQ+ scores 73 vs 45 on comfort.
Pick tire B
Your priority is wet-weather safety
Laufenn S Fit EQ+ scores 76 vs 52 on wet.
Tire A · Kumho Crugen HP71
Tire B · Laufenn S Fit EQ+
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Crugen HP71 or S Fit EQ+?
Which is better in the wet, Crugen HP71 or S Fit EQ+?
Laufenn S Fit EQ+, 76 vs 52 on our wet score.
Which grips better on dry roads, Crugen HP71 or S Fit EQ+?
Laufenn S Fit EQ+, 82 vs 44 on our dry score.
Which is quieter, Crugen HP71 or S Fit EQ+?
Laufenn S Fit EQ+, 73 vs 55 on our noise score.
Which is more comfortable, Crugen HP71 or S Fit EQ+?
Laufenn S Fit EQ+, 73 vs 45 on our comfort score.
Which lasts longer, Crugen HP71 or S Fit EQ+?
Laufenn S Fit EQ+, 56 vs 37 on our treadwear score.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology