Tests – · none yet Owners 34 · 278 reviews
“Tesla model y tire HP71 crugen on tirerack is offering $80 rebate per tire.”
Head-to-head
Updated
Kumho Crugen HP71 vs Laufenn S Fit EQ+ — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 11 road tests and 278 + 11 owner reviews. How we score
S Fit EQ+ is ahead, 74–46
Add your size for an exact match
/R
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
44
Dry
S Fit EQ+ +3882Why this score
Source Crugen HP71 S Fit EQ+ Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 10 tests ≈ 53 (est.) 80 Reviews found online 31 85 Crugen HP71: 60% × 52.5 (est.) + 40% × 30.6 = 44
S Fit EQ+: 60% × 79.7 + 40% × 84.7 = 82
No road tests of dry for Crugen HP71. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).
-
51
Wet
S Fit EQ+ +2475Why this score
Source Crugen HP71 S Fit EQ+ Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 11 tests ≈ 56 (est.) 73 Reviews found online 44 78 Crugen HP71: 60% × 56 (est.) + 40% × 43.8 = 51
S Fit EQ+: 60% × 73.5 + 40% × 78.2 = 75
No road tests of wet for Crugen HP71. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
-
53
Snow
No comparison–Why this score
Source Crugen HP71 S Fit EQ+ Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 61 (est.) – Reviews found online 41 – Crugen HP71: 60% × 61.1 (est.) + 40% × 40.9 = 53
No road tests of snow for Crugen HP71. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).
-
44
Comfort
S Fit EQ+ +2973Why this score
Source Crugen HP71 S Fit EQ+ Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 2 tests ≈ 61 (est.) 66 Reviews found online 32 77 Crugen HP71: 40% × 61.3 (est.) + 60% × 32 = 44
S Fit EQ+: 40% × 66.4 + 60% × 77.1 = 73
No road tests of comfort for Crugen HP71. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).
-
54
Noise
S Fit EQ+ +1973Why this score
Source Crugen HP71 S Fit EQ+ Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 5 tests ≈ 66 (est.) 77 Reviews found online 36 ≈ 66 (est.) Crugen HP71: 60% × 66.3 (est.) + 40% × 35.5 = 54
S Fit EQ+: 60% × 76.8 + 40% × 66.3 (est.) = 73
No road tests of noise for Crugen HP71. The test half is the tested tires’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.
No owner ratings of noise for S Fit EQ+. The owner half is the owners’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests, so the tests say nothing about how owners would rate it.
-
37
Treadwear
S Fit EQ+ +1956Why this score
Source Crugen HP71 S Fit EQ+ Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 5 tests ≈ 49 (est.) 43 Reviews found online 19 76 Crugen HP71: 60% × 49.4 (est.) + 40% × 18.5 = 37
S Fit EQ+: 60% × 43.2 + 40% × 76.2 = 56
No road tests of treadwear for Crugen HP71. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
-
51
Handling (owners)
S Fit EQ+ +3283Why this score
Source Crugen HP71 S Fit EQ+ Reviews found online 51 83 -
–
Efficiency
No comparison73Why this score
Source Crugen HP71 S Fit EQ+ Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 6 tests – 73
Scores at a glance
| Category | Kumho Crugen HP71 | Laufenn S Fit EQ+ |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 46 | 74 |
| Dry | 44 | 82 |
| Wet | 51 | 75 |
| Snow | 53 | – |
| Comfort | 44 | 73 |
| Noise | 54 | 73 |
| Treadwear | 37 | 56 |
| Handling (owners) | 51 | 83 |
| Efficiency | – | 73 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Not important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Recomputed
Headline score
46
/ 100
Crugen HP71
74
/ 100
S Fit EQ+
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
The professional test results behind the scores
Per discipline: the average % of the best tire over every test both tires were in, and how many of those tests each one won. “Different tests” rows compare results from separate tests.
| Discipline | Category | Crugen HP71 | S Fit EQ+ | Δ | Head-to-head |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Also published by the testers (not in the score) | |||||
| Overall Ranking | Overall | #8/9 2021 Teknikens Värld Summer Tire Test R18 | #9/10 2026 Auto Zeitung 18 Inch Summer Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A Crugen HP71
Pros
- Strong value: frequently described as much cheaper than Michelin, Pirelli or Bridgestone alternatives while not feeling like a budget tire.
- Good wet and heavy-rain traction, with some reports of confident light-snow performance.
- Quiet, smooth ride reported by many owners, often as an improvement over the stock tires (Bridgestone Dueler, Pirelli, Hankook).
Cons
- Premature or uneven tread wear is the most common complaint, with reports of tires worn out at roughly 15,000 to 27,000 miles or within 1.5 years, far below the 65,000-mile rating.
- Road and highway noise, including howling that develops with mileage, reported by several owners.
- Vibration and difficulty keeping the tires balanced, in some cases even after repeated balancing and rotations.
Tire B S Fit EQ+
Pros
- Good to excellent dry grip, traction and handling, with several reviewers noting stable, confident behavior
- Wet grip described as decent to excellent, with plenty of grip in both conditions
- Excellent value; frequently compared favorably with Continental, Goodyear, Michelin and Hankook tires at a much lower price
Cons
- Road noise noted as louder than expected by some reviewers, with one reporting a marked increase after 2,500 km
- Ride can feel stiff or harder than needed, and one reviewer found the tires became hard and uncomfortable below 10°C
- Longevity is uncertain; reviewers estimate roughly 18,000-20,000 miles from one set, and others are unsure how long they will last
What real owners are saying
From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score
Tire A
Mixed
Kumho Crugen HP71
Community opinions on the Kumho Crugen HP71 (including EV variants) are generally mixed, primarily leaning on price and initial comfort versus longevity. Many users appreciate the affordable pricing, quiet/smooth ride, and good handling, but a significant number report faster-than-expected tread wear and occasional issues with foam lining separation or durability on heavier vehicles.
r/tires
·2026-10-14
“Kumho warranty I had these for a little under 18 months. The thread is still good, but the tires have these cracks. Do you guys think I can claim warranty from Kumho? These are Kumho Crugen HP71. Manufacturing date 01/24.”
r/TeslaModelY
·4 upvotes ·2026-06-17
“Tesla model y tire HP71 crugen on tirerack is offering $80 rebate per tire.”
bobistheoilguy.com
·2023-03-02
“Bought a set of Kumho tires to replace the OE Michelins on the wife's Ford Edge. The Michelins have barely 35K and aren't going to pass the NC safety check. For being a top tier tire they were wildly mediocre. I've has several sets of Kumho and they are better than average and not too expensive. I bought four of these. Anybody have experience with Kumhos? Kumho Crugen HP71 245 /60 R18 105V SL BSW”
Top themes
#Affordability and Value#Ride Comfort and Noise#Tread Wear and Longevity#EV Performance and Efficiency#Durability and Quality Issues
Based on 52 community posts
Tire B
Laufenn S Fit EQ+
We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Kumho Crugen HP71 | B · Laufenn S Fit EQ+ |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer Ultra High Performance tires | Summer |
| Vehicle type | SUV and 4x4 | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | 63 | 74 |
| Rim diameters | 16″ – 22″ | 15″ – 20″ |
| Tread depth | 9.9/32″ | — |
| UTQG | 640 A A | 360 A A |
| Treadwear warranty | 65,000 mi | — |
| Sidewall | Blackwall | — |
| Max pressure | 51 psi | — |
| Sizes in common | 21 | 21 |
Which one should you actually buy?
46
/ 100
Kumho Crugen HP71
74
/ 100
Laufenn S Fit EQ+
Winner: Laufenn S Fit EQ+ — better dry, handling and comfort. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Pick tire B
You want the most grip on dry roads
Laufenn S Fit EQ+ scores 82 vs 44 on dry.
Pick tire B
You enjoy sharp, responsive handling
Laufenn S Fit EQ+ scores 83 vs 51 on handling.
Pick tire B
You want the most comfortable ride
Laufenn S Fit EQ+ scores 73 vs 44 on comfort.
Pick tire B
Your priority is wet-weather safety
Laufenn S Fit EQ+ scores 75 vs 51 on wet.
Tire A · Kumho Crugen HP71
Tire B · Laufenn S Fit EQ+
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Crugen HP71 or S Fit EQ+?
Which is better in the wet, Crugen HP71 or S Fit EQ+?
Laufenn S Fit EQ+, 75 vs 51 on our wet score.
Which grips better on dry roads, Crugen HP71 or S Fit EQ+?
Laufenn S Fit EQ+, 82 vs 44 on our dry score.
Which is quieter, Crugen HP71 or S Fit EQ+?
Laufenn S Fit EQ+, 73 vs 54 on our noise score.
Which is more comfortable, Crugen HP71 or S Fit EQ+?
Laufenn S Fit EQ+, 73 vs 44 on our comfort score.
Which lasts longer, Crugen HP71 or S Fit EQ+?
Laufenn S Fit EQ+, 56 vs 37 on our treadwear score.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology