Tests – · none yet Owners 34 · 277 reviews
“Tesla model y tire HP71 crugen on tirerack is offering $80 rebate per tire.”
Head-to-head
Updated
Kumho Crugen HP71 vs Laufenn S fit EQ — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 4 road tests and 277 + 14 owner reviews. How we score
S fit EQ is ahead, 53–46
Add your size for an exact match
/R
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
44
Dry
S fit EQ +751Why this score
Source Crugen HP71 S fit EQ Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 3 tests ≈ 53 (est.) 49 Reviews found online 31 53 Crugen HP71: 60% × 52.5 (est.) + 40% × 30.5 = 44
S fit EQ: 60% × 48.8 + 40% × 53.4 = 51
No road tests of dry for Crugen HP71. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).
-
51
Wet
Crugen HP71 +150Why this score
Source Crugen HP71 S fit EQ Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 3 tests ≈ 56 (est.) 47 Reviews found online 44 54 Crugen HP71: 60% × 56.1 (est.) + 40% × 44 = 51
S fit EQ: 60% × 46.9 + 40% × 53.6 = 50
No road tests of wet for Crugen HP71. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
-
53
Snow
No comparison–Why this score
Source Crugen HP71 S fit EQ Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 61 (est.) – Reviews found online 41 – Crugen HP71: 60% × 61.1 (est.) + 40% × 40.9 = 53
No road tests of snow for Crugen HP71. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).
-
44
Comfort
S fit EQ +1458Why this score
Source Crugen HP71 S fit EQ Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 61 (est.) ≈ 66 (est.) Reviews found online 32 53 Crugen HP71: 40% × 61.3 (est.) + 60% × 32.2 = 44
S fit EQ: 40% × 65.6 (est.) + 60% × 53.4 = 58
No road tests of comfort for Crugen HP71. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).
No road tests of comfort for S fit EQ. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).
-
54
Noise
S fit EQ +256Why this score
Source Crugen HP71 S fit EQ Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests ≈ 66 (est.) 49 Reviews found online 36 ≈ 66 (est.) Crugen HP71: 60% × 66.4 (est.) + 40% × 35.8 = 54
S fit EQ: 60% × 48.8 + 40% × 66.4 (est.) = 56
No road tests of noise for Crugen HP71. The test half is the tested tires’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.
No owner ratings of noise for S fit EQ. The owner half is the owners’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests, so the tests say nothing about how owners would rate it.
-
37
Treadwear
S fit EQ +2461Why this score
Source Crugen HP71 S fit EQ Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests ≈ 49 (est.) 64 Reviews found online 19 56 Crugen HP71: 60% × 49.2 (est.) + 40% × 18.5 = 37
S fit EQ: 60% × 64.3 + 40% × 56 = 61
No road tests of treadwear for Crugen HP71. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
-
51
Handling (owners)
Crugen HP71 +546Why this score
Source Crugen HP71 S fit EQ Reviews found online 51 46 -
–
Efficiency
No comparison71Why this score
Source Crugen HP71 S fit EQ Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests – 71
Scores at a glance
| Category | Kumho Crugen HP71 | Laufenn S fit EQ |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 46 | 53 |
| Dry | 44 | 51 |
| Wet | 51 | 50 |
| Snow | 53 | – |
| Comfort | 44 | 58 |
| Noise | 54 | 56 |
| Treadwear | 37 | 61 |
| Handling (owners) | 51 | 46 |
| Efficiency | – | 71 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Not important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Recomputed
Headline score
46
/ 100
Crugen HP71
53
/ 100
S fit EQ
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
The professional test results behind the scores
Per discipline: the average % of the best tire over every test both tires were in, and how many of those tests each one won. “Different tests” rows compare results from separate tests.
| Discipline | Category | Crugen HP71 | S fit EQ | Δ | Head-to-head |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Also published by the testers (not in the score) | |||||
| Overall Ranking | Overall | #8/9 2021 Teknikens Värld Summer Tire Test R18 | #12/10 2020 TCS Summer Tire Test R17 | – | Different tests |
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A Crugen HP71
Pros
- Affordable pricing compared to premium tier brands
- Quiet and smooth ride quality when new
- Confident wet-weather traction and performance in heavy rain
Cons
- Significantly premature tread wear and short lifespan for many users
- Developing loud road noise or howling as mileage increases
- Balancing issues and vehicle vibrations
Tire B S fit EQ
Pros
- Attractive price point offering high value for money
- Low road noise resulting in a quiet, comfortable ride for daily commuting
- Competent dry grip and handling under normal driving conditions
Cons
- Flimsy sidewalls prone to bubbling and easy puncture from potholes
- Poor wet weather performance with tendencies toward understeer and traction loss
- Lack of steering feedback and poor turn-in response
What real owners are saying
From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score
Tire A
Mixed
Kumho Crugen HP71
Community opinions on the Kumho Crugen HP71 (including EV variants) are generally mixed, primarily leaning on price and initial comfort versus longevity. Many users appreciate the affordable pricing, quiet/smooth ride, and good handling, but a significant number report faster-than-expected tread wear and occasional issues with foam lining separation or durability on heavier vehicles.
r/Ioniq5
·1 upvote ·2026-08-30
“The HP71 are actually the OE tire for several trim/MY combinations for the Ioniq 5 and EV6 and they're decent tires. The longest lasting tire is the Defender 2, with the trade off of mediocre traction. I run the Nokian One because it's a batter balance of traction and tread wear than the defender but still quiet and very long-lasting.”
r/volvoc40
·61 upvotes ·2026-07-08
“Yet Another C40 Wheel Downsize Report I decided to join the crowd in downsizing from the factory 20" wheels to 18" Wheels: Voxx Paso Tires: Kumho Crugen EV HP71 (currently on sale for $500 for a set of 4) I was a bit worried about wheel fitment because of the large brake calipers, but they fit without issue, standard install. I've only put about 100 miles on them so far, but the ride is much more comfortable and these new tires are SO much quieter than the old tires that were installed when I bought the vehicle (CPO): Michelin Pilot Sport A/S 4 I don't have enough data yet to see if this will make a range improvement, but I imagine it will as they're skinnier tires and EV optimized. So far I'm impressed with the Kumho's, especially for the price they're offering. And I think these new wheels look pretty decent! Read more”
r/Cadillac
·2 upvotes ·2026-09-28
“I have The Kumho Crugen HP71 275/50 R22 111H on my 22 ESV Sport And don’t regret it at all. They are much better than original ones and also a lot cheaper in Walmart.”
Top themes
#Affordability and Value#Ride Comfort and Noise#Tread Wear and Longevity#EV Performance and Efficiency#Durability and Quality Issues
Based on 52 community posts
Tire B
Laufenn S fit EQ
We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Kumho Crugen HP71 | B · Laufenn S fit EQ |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer Ultra High Performance tires | Summer |
| Vehicle type | SUV and 4x4 | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | 63 | 24 |
| Rim diameters | 16″ – 22″ | 15″ – 20″ |
| Tread depth | 9.9/32″ | — |
| UTQG | 640 A A | 360 A A |
| Treadwear warranty | 65,000 mi | — |
| Sidewall | Blackwall | — |
| Max pressure | 51 psi | — |
| Sizes in common | 5 | 5 |
Which one should you actually buy?
46
/ 100
Kumho Crugen HP71
53
/ 100
Laufenn S fit EQ
Winner: Laufenn S fit EQ — better treadwear, comfort and dry. Where the Kumho Crugen HP71 is ahead, it is by less than 3 points.
Pick tire B
You want the longest tread life
Laufenn S fit EQ scores 61 vs 37 on treadwear.
Pick tire B
You want the most comfortable ride
Laufenn S fit EQ scores 58 vs 44 on comfort.
Pick tire B
You want the most grip on dry roads
Laufenn S fit EQ scores 51 vs 44 on dry.
Tire A · Kumho Crugen HP71
Tire B · Laufenn S fit EQ
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Crugen HP71 or S fit EQ?
Which is better in the wet, Crugen HP71 or S fit EQ?
Neither, by our numbers: 51 vs 50 on the wet score, within 3 points.
Which grips better on dry roads, Crugen HP71 or S fit EQ?
Laufenn S fit EQ, 51 vs 44 on our dry score.
Which is quieter, Crugen HP71 or S fit EQ?
Neither, by our numbers: 54 vs 56 on the noise score, within 3 points.
Which is more comfortable, Crugen HP71 or S fit EQ?
Laufenn S fit EQ, 58 vs 44 on our comfort score.
Which lasts longer, Crugen HP71 or S fit EQ?
Laufenn S fit EQ, 61 vs 37 on our treadwear score.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology