tirewheelguide
Head-to-head Updated

Kumho Crugen HP71 vs Toyo Proxes ST — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews. Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 275 + 14 owner reviews. How we score

Proxes ST is ahead, 71–52

Check price on Amazon · Proxes ST or Crugen HP71 on Amazon
Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Kumho Crugen HP71
Tire AKumho

Crugen HP71

Summer Ultra High Performance tires

Tests – · none yet Owners 41 · 275 reviews

“Tesla model y tire HP71 crugen on tirerack is offering $80 rebate per tire.”

Toyo Proxes ST
Tire BToyo

Proxes ST

All Season

Provisional

Tests – · none yet Owners 73 · 14 reviews

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 48

    Dry

    Proxes ST +24
    72
    Why this score
    SourceCrugen HP71Proxes ST
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 55 (est.)≈ 71 (est.)
    Reviews found online3775

    Crugen HP71: 60% × 55.2 (est.) + 40% × 36.6 = 48

    Proxes ST: 60% × 70.5 (est.) + 40% × 74.7 = 72

    No road tests of dry for Crugen HP71. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).

    No road tests of dry for Proxes ST. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).

  2. 55

    Wet

    Proxes ST +20
    75
    Why this score
    SourceCrugen HP71Proxes ST
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 58 (est.)≈ 74 (est.)
    Reviews found online4977

    Crugen HP71: 60% × 58.2 (est.) + 40% × 49.1 = 55

    Proxes ST: 60% × 73.6 (est.) + 40% × 76.6 = 75

    No road tests of wet for Crugen HP71. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).

    No road tests of wet for Proxes ST. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).

  3. 57

    Snow

    Proxes ST +9
    66
    Why this score
    SourceCrugen HP71Proxes ST
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 63 (est.)≈ 68 (est.)
    Reviews found online4864

    Crugen HP71: 60% × 62.5 (est.) + 40% × 47.6 = 57

    Proxes ST: 60% × 67.8 (est.) + 40% × 63.6 = 66

    No road tests of snow for Crugen HP71. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.33).

    No road tests of snow for Proxes ST. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.33).

  4. 54

    Comfort

    Proxes ST +18
    72
    Why this score
    SourceCrugen HP71Proxes ST
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 64 (est.)≈ 70 (est.)
    Reviews found online4074

    Crugen HP71: 60% × 64 (est.) + 40% × 39.6 = 54

    Proxes ST: 60% × 70 (est.) + 40% × 74.1 = 72

    No road tests of comfort for Crugen HP71 or Proxes ST. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.

  5. 58

    Noise

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourceCrugen HP71Proxes ST
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 67 (est.)–
    Reviews found online44–

    Crugen HP71: 60% × 67.3 (est.) + 40% × 43.7 = 58

    No road tests of noise for Crugen HP71. The test half is the tested tires’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.

  6. 44

    Treadwear

    Proxes ST +25
    69
    Why this score
    SourceCrugen HP71Proxes ST
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 54 (est.)≈ 67 (est.)
    Reviews found online2972

    Crugen HP71: 60% × 54.4 (est.) + 40% × 29.1 = 44

    Proxes ST: 60% × 67.5 (est.) + 40% × 71.7 = 69

    No road tests of treadwear for Crugen HP71. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).

    No road tests of treadwear for Proxes ST. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).

  7. 55

    Handling (owners)

    Proxes ST +16
    71
    Why this score
    SourceCrugen HP71Proxes ST
    Reviews found online5571
Scores at a glance
CategoryKumho Crugen HP71Toyo Proxes ST
Relative Score 52 71
Dry 48 72
Wet 55 75
Snow 57 66
Comfort 54 72
Noise 58 –
Treadwear 44 69
Handling (owners) 55 71

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score

Crugen HP71

Proxes ST

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Crugen HP71

Pros

  • Affordable pricing compared to premium tier brands
  • Quiet and smooth ride quality when new
  • Confident wet-weather traction and performance in heavy rain

Cons

  • Significantly premature tread wear and short lifespan for many users
  • Developing loud road noise or howling as mileage increases
  • Balancing issues and vehicle vibrations
All owner themes in the Crugen HP71 review

Tire B Proxes ST

Pros

  • Exceptional tread life and long-term durability
  • Quiet and comfortable ride quality compared to other brands and run-flats
  • Strong dry and wet grip with good resistance to aquaplaning

Cons

  • Poor performance and limited traction in snow and ice
  • A small number of users experienced disappointing treadwear and longevity
  • Conflicting feedback regarding wet grip, with isolated reports of poor performance
All owner themes in the Proxes ST review

What real owners are saying

From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score

Tire A

Kumho Crugen HP71

Mixed

Community sentiment for the Kumho Crugen HP71 (and its EV variant) is mixed, with owners praising its affordability, comfortable ride, and quiet performance on many vehicles. However, a significant number of drivers report disappointingly rapid tread wear—particularly on heavy electric vehicles—as well as occasional noise on coarse surfaces and internal acoustic foam detachment issues.

bobistheoilguy.com ·2023-03-02

“Bought a set of Kumho tires to replace the OE Michelins on the wife's Ford Edge. The Michelins have barely 35K and aren't going to pass the NC safety check. For being a top tier tire they were wildly mediocre. I've has several sets of Kumho and they are better than average and not too expensive. I bought four of these. Anybody have experience with Kumhos? Kumho​ Crugen HP71​ 245 /60 R18 105V SL BSW​”
r/VWiD4Owners ·3 upvotes ·2026-02-14

“2023 ID4 AWD Pro S Kumho Crugen EV HP71 I replaced the original worn down (and one with a sidewall bump) Pirellis at 33k with the EV version (badges on the sidewall) of the HP71 (direct from dealer). They're more expensive than the non-EV versions and have a lower warranty. So far they're impressive: ride is softer/smoother, quieter, deep treads. Hard to tell if efficiency changed with the winter weather, but we were getting 3mi/kWh on a 34 degree day.”
teslamotorsclub.com ·2 upvotes ·2026-02-12

“That is a crazy good price - The TA91 is low $200s wholesale! (Tire shop pricing). And $279.30 retail. (Tire Rack) Grab them while you can. Sometimes Wal Mart beats any price I can get when they're blowing out a specific tire. FWIW we run the Kumho HP71 EV (OE tire) on our EV9 and it's a super quiet tire. I bought it again for the Spring now that the car is actually aligned and won't burn through them.”
Top themes
#Rapid tread wear#Affordable price value#Cabin noise levels#Ride comfort#EV tire performance#Acoustic foam issues#OEM tire replacement

Based on 51 community posts

Tire B

Toyo Proxes ST

We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Kumho Crugen HP71 B · Toyo Proxes ST
CategorySummer Ultra High Performance tiresAll Season
Vehicle typeSUV and 4x4SUV and 4x4
Sizes available631
Rim diameters16″ – 22″19″
Tread depth9.9/32″—
UTQG640 A A—
Treadwear warranty65,000 mi—
SidewallBlackwall—
Max pressure51 psi—

Which one should you actually buy?

Kumho Crugen HP71

Toyo Proxes ST

Winner: Toyo Proxes ST — better treadwear, dry and wet. It leads or ties in every category we score. Toyo Proxes ST rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 14 reviews), so read this result as provisional.

Pick tire B You want the longest tread life

Toyo Proxes ST scores 69 vs 44 on treadwear.

Pick tire B You want the most grip on dry roads

Toyo Proxes ST scores 72 vs 48 on dry.

Pick tire B Your priority is wet-weather safety

Toyo Proxes ST scores 75 vs 55 on wet.

Pick tire B You want the most comfortable ride

Toyo Proxes ST scores 72 vs 54 on comfort.

Tire A · Kumho Crugen HP71
Check price on Amazon
Tire B · Toyo Proxes ST
Check price on Amazon

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Crugen HP71 or Proxes ST?

Which is better in the wet, Crugen HP71 or Proxes ST?

Toyo Proxes ST, 75 vs 55 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, Crugen HP71 or Proxes ST?

Toyo Proxes ST, 72 vs 48 on our dry score.

Which is better in snow, Crugen HP71 or Proxes ST?

Toyo Proxes ST, 66 vs 57 on our snow score.

Which is more comfortable, Crugen HP71 or Proxes ST?

Toyo Proxes ST, 72 vs 54 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, Crugen HP71 or Proxes ST?

Toyo Proxes ST, 69 vs 44 on our treadwear score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology