tirewheelguide
Head-to-head Updated

Kumho Crugen HT51 vs Nexen Roadian CT8 — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 2 + 0 road tests and 164 + 6 owner reviews. How we score

Crugen HT51 is ahead, 67–61

Check price on Amazon · Crugen HT51 or Roadian CT8 on Amazon
Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Kumho Crugen HT51
Tire AKumho

Crugen HT51

All Season

± 9

Tests 55 · 2 tests Owners 75 · 164 reviews

Best test result: #2 of 9 in 2024 Tire Rack Highway All Season Tyre Test (dry circle)

Nexen Roadian CT8
Tire BNexen

Roadian CT8

Summer

± 8Provisional

Tests – · none yet Owners 57 · 6 reviews

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 65

    Dry

    Crugen HT51 +4
    61
    Why this score
    SourceCrugen HT51Roadian CT8
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / – tests58≈ 64 (est.)
    Reviews found online7658

    Crugen HT51: 60% × 58.2 + 40% × 75.8 = 65

    Roadian CT8: 60% × 63.8 (est.) + 40% × 57.9 = 61

    No road tests of dry for Roadian CT8. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).

  2. 67

    Wet

    Crugen HT51 +5
    62
    Why this score
    SourceCrugen HT51Roadian CT8
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / – tests60≈ 64 (est.)
    Reviews found online7858

    Crugen HT51: 60% × 59.5 + 40% × 78 = 67

    Roadian CT8: 60% × 63.8 (est.) + 40% × 58.1 = 62

    No road tests of wet for Roadian CT8. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

  3. 49

    Snow

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourceCrugen HT51Roadian CT8
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / – tests36–
    Reviews found online70–

    Crugen HT51: 60% × 35.9 + 40% × 69.6 = 49

  4. 70

    Comfort

    Crugen HT51 +8
    62
    Why this score
    SourceCrugen HT51Roadian CT8
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 69 (est.)≈ 67 (est.)
    Reviews found online7059

    Crugen HT51: 40% × 69 (est.) + 60% × 70.3 = 70

    Roadian CT8: 40% × 66.7 (est.) + 60% × 59 = 62

    No road tests of comfort for Crugen HT51 or Roadian CT8. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.

  5. 71

    Noise

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourceCrugen HT51Roadian CT8
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 66 (est.)–
    Reviews found online79–

    Crugen HT51: 60% × 66.3 (est.) + 40% × 78.9 = 71

    No road tests of noise for Crugen HT51. The test half is the tested tires’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.

  6. 66

    Treadwear

    Crugen HT51 +7
    59
    Why this score
    SourceCrugen HT51Roadian CT8
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / – tests58≈ 62 (est.)
    Reviews found online7654

    Crugen HT51: 60% × 58.4 + 40% × 76.4 = 66

    Roadian CT8: 60% × 61.9 (est.) + 40% × 53.6 = 59

    No road tests of treadwear for Roadian CT8. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).

  7. 74

    Handling (owners)

    Crugen HT51 +12
    62
    Why this score
    SourceCrugen HT51Roadian CT8
    Reviews found online7462
Scores at a glance
CategoryKumho Crugen HT51Nexen Roadian CT8
Relative Score 67 61
Dry 65 61
Wet 67 62
Snow 49 –
Comfort 70 62
Noise 71 –
Treadwear 66 59
Handling (owners) 74 62

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score
± 9

Crugen HT51

± 8

Roadian CT8

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

The professional test results behind the scores

Per discipline: the average % of the best tire over every test both tires were in, and how many of those tests each one won. “Different tests” rows compare results from separate tests.

DisciplineCategoryCrugen HT51Roadian CT8ΔHead-to-head
Also published by the testers (not in the score)
Overall Ranking Overall #9/30 2026 Tire Rack All Terrain Tyre Snow Test #12/16 2019 ADAC Van 215/65 R16 C Tyre Test – Different tests

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Crugen HT51

Pros

  • Exceptional value and lower price point compared to premium competitors
  • Smooth, quiet, and comfortable highway ride
  • Strong dry, wet, and winter/snow traction

Cons

  • Slightly vague or 'squishy' steering feel/sidewall stiffness compared to some OEM tires
  • Potential negative impact on fuel economy (decreased MPG for some truck owners)
  • Occasional reports of accelerated shoulder wear or balancing issues
All owner themes in the Crugen HT51 review

Tire B Roadian CT8

Pros

  • Affordable price point offering good value compared to other budget options
  • Strong dry handling and stable road manners
  • Sturdy physical construction noted by some heavy-duty users

Cons

  • Severe wet-weather performance, particularly poor cornering grip that degrades with age
  • Structural integrity issues including premature bulging and broken steel belts
  • Catastrophic failures reported such as unexpected tire blowouts and tread separations at relatively low mileage
All owner themes in the Roadian CT8 review

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Kumho Crugen HT51 B · Nexen Roadian CT8
CategoryAll SeasonSummer
Vehicle typeSUV and 4x4Van
Sizes available4429
Rim diameters15″ – 22″13″ – 17″
Tread depth12.5/32″11/32″
UTQG720 A A—
Treadwear warranty70,000 mi—
SidewallBlackwallBlackwall
Max pressure50 psi65 psi
Sizes in common44

Which one should you actually buy?

Kumho Crugen HT51

Nexen Roadian CT8

Winner: Kumho Crugen HT51 — better handling, comfort and treadwear. It leads or ties in every category we score. Nexen Roadian CT8 rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 6 reviews), so read this result as provisional.

Pick tire A You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Kumho Crugen HT51 scores 74 vs 62 on handling.

Pick tire A You want the most comfortable ride

Kumho Crugen HT51 scores 70 vs 62 on comfort.

Pick tire A You want the longest tread life

Kumho Crugen HT51 scores 66 vs 59 on treadwear.

Pick tire A Your priority is wet-weather safety

Kumho Crugen HT51 scores 67 vs 62 on wet.

Tire A · Kumho Crugen HT51
Check price on Amazon
Tire B · Nexen Roadian CT8
Check price on Amazon

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Crugen HT51 or Roadian CT8?

Which is better in the wet, Crugen HT51 or Roadian CT8?

Kumho Crugen HT51, 67 vs 62 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, Crugen HT51 or Roadian CT8?

Kumho Crugen HT51, 65 vs 61 on our dry score.

Which is more comfortable, Crugen HT51 or Roadian CT8?

Kumho Crugen HT51, 70 vs 62 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, Crugen HT51 or Roadian CT8?

Kumho Crugen HT51, 66 vs 59 on our treadwear score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology