Head-to-head Updated

Kumho Crugen HT51 vs Riken Raptor HR — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): 60% professional tests, 40% owner reviews.

Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Tire AKumho

Crugen HT51

All Season

Tests – · 1 test Owners 75 · 164 reviews

Tire BRiken

Raptor HR

Grand Touring All-Season

Tests – · none yet Owners 71 · 1 review

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 73

    Dry

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourceCrugen HT51Raptor HR
    Reviews found online77–
  2. 75

    Wet

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourceCrugen HT51Raptor HR
    Reviews found online77–
  3. 70

    Snow

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourceCrugen HT51Raptor HR
    Reviews found online70–
  4. 71

    Comfort

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourceCrugen HT51Raptor HR
    Reviews found online72–
  5. 71

    Noise

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourceCrugen HT51Raptor HR
    Reviews found online78–
  6. 64

    Treadwear

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourceCrugen HT51Raptor HR
    Professional tests (TWG score)58–
    Reviews found online74–
  7. 75

    Handling

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourceCrugen HT51Raptor HR
    Reviews found online75–
Scores at a glance
Kumho Crugen HT51 vs Riken Raptor HR: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryKumho Crugen HT51Riken Raptor HR
Relative Score 71 –
Dry 73 –
Wet 75 –
Snow 70 –
Comfort 71 –
Noise 71 –
Treadwear 64 –
Handling 75 –

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Less important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Less important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score

Crugen HT51

Raptor HR

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Crugen HT51

Pros

  • Exceptional value and lower price point compared to premium competitors
  • Smooth, quiet, and comfortable highway ride
  • Strong dry, wet, and winter/snow traction

Cons

  • Slightly vague or 'squishy' steering feel/sidewall stiffness compared to some OEM tires
  • Potential negative impact on fuel economy (decreased MPG for some truck owners)
  • Occasional reports of accelerated shoulder wear or balancing issues
All owner themes in the Crugen HT51 review

Tire B Raptor HR

Not enough owner reviews yet to extract themes.

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Kumho Crugen HT51 B · Riken Raptor HR
CategoryAll SeasonGrand Touring All-Season
Vehicle typeSUV and 4x4Passenger Car / Crossover
Sizes available44—
Rim diameters15″ – 22″—
Tread depth12.5/32″—
UTQG720 A A—
Treadwear warranty70,000 mi—
SidewallBlackwall—
Max pressure50 psi—

Which one should you actually buy?

Kumho Crugen HT51

Riken Raptor HR

Only Kumho Crugen HT51 has enough test and review data for a Relative Score, so there is no head-to-head winner yet.

Tire A · Kumho Crugen HT51
Tire B · Riken Raptor HR

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.