Tests – · 1 test Owners 76 · 164 reviews
Kumho Crugen HT51 vs Toyo Celsius — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 1 + 6 road tests and 164 + 152 owner reviews. How we score
Crugen HT51 is ahead, 72–63
Add your size for an exact match
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
74
Dry
Crugen HT51 +1856Why this score
Source Crugen HT51 Celsius Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 6 tests ≈ 72 (est.) 48 Reviews found online 77 69 Crugen HT51: 60% × 71.6 (est.) + 40% × 76.5 = 74
Celsius: 60% × 47.8 + 40% × 68.8 = 56
No road tests of dry for Crugen HT51. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).
-
76
Wet
Crugen HT51 +1561Why this score
Source Crugen HT51 Celsius Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 6 tests ≈ 75 (est.) 54 Reviews found online 79 71 Crugen HT51: 60% × 75 (est.) + 40% × 78.5 = 76
Celsius: 60% × 54.1 + 40% × 71.2 = 61
No road tests of wet for Crugen HT51. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
-
70
Snow
Celsius +575Why this score
Source Crugen HT51 Celsius Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 4 tests ≈ 70 (est.) 76 Reviews found online 70 73 Crugen HT51: 60% × 70.5 (est.) + 40% × 70 = 70
Celsius: 60% × 76 + 40% × 72.5 = 75
No road tests of snow for Crugen HT51. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.37).
-
70
Comfort
Crugen HT51 +169Why this score
Source Crugen HT51 Celsius Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 69 (est.) ≈ 69 (est.) Reviews found online 71 69 Crugen HT51: 40% × 69.5 (est.) + 60% × 71.1 = 70
Celsius: 40% × 69.1 (est.) + 60% × 69.1 = 69
No road tests of comfort for Crugen HT51 or Celsius. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
72
Noise
Crugen HT51 +1656Why this score
Source Crugen HT51 Celsius Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 4 tests ≈ 67 (est.) 48 Reviews found online 80 ≈ 67 (est.) Crugen HT51: 60% × 66.6 (est.) + 40% × 79.5 = 72
Celsius: 60% × 48.4 + 40% × 66.6 (est.) = 56
No road tests of noise for Crugen HT51. The test half is the tested tires’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.
No owner ratings of noise for Celsius. The owner half is the owners’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests, so the tests say nothing about how owners would rate it.
-
65
Treadwear
Celsius +368Why this score
Source Crugen HT51 Celsius Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / – tests 58 ≈ 67 (est.) Reviews found online 76 70 Crugen HT51: 60% × 57.7 + 40% × 76.4 = 65
Celsius: 60% × 67.4 (est.) + 40% × 69.8 = 68
No road tests of treadwear for Celsius. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).
-
74
Handling (owners)
Crugen HT51 +1064Why this score
Source Crugen HT51 Celsius Reviews found online 74 64 -
–
Efficiency
No comparison29Why this score
Source Crugen HT51 Celsius Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 4 tests – 29
Scores at a glance
| Category | Kumho Crugen HT51 | Toyo Celsius |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 72 | 63 |
| Dry | 74 | 56 |
| Wet | 76 | 61 |
| Snow | 70 | 75 |
| Comfort | 70 | 69 |
| Noise | 72 | 56 |
| Treadwear | 65 | 68 |
| Handling (owners) | 74 | 64 |
| Efficiency | – | 29 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Crugen HT51
Celsius
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
The professional test results behind the scores
Per discipline: the average % of the best tire over every test both tires were in, and how many of those tests each one won. “Different tests” rows compare results from separate tests.
| Discipline | Category | Crugen HT51 | Celsius | Δ | Head-to-head |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Also published by the testers (not in the score) | |||||
| Overall Ranking | Overall | #5/13 2022 Consumer Reports All Season Truck Tires | #9/8 2022 ACE/ARBÖ/GTÜ All-Season Tire Test R17 | – | Different tests |
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A Crugen HT51
Pros
- Exceptional value and lower price point compared to premium competitors
- Smooth, quiet, and comfortable highway ride
- Strong dry, wet, and winter/snow traction
Cons
- Slightly vague or 'squishy' steering feel/sidewall stiffness compared to some OEM tires
- Potential negative impact on fuel economy (decreased MPG for some truck owners)
- Occasional reports of accelerated shoulder wear or balancing issues
Tire B Celsius
Pros
- Exceptional snow and winter weather performance
- Quiet and smooth ride quality
- High value for money compared to premium brands
Cons
- Some complaints regarding wet traction and hydroplaning resistance
- Softer sidewalls can lead to a bouncy feel or slower steering response
- Faster tread wear reported by certain users compared to competitors like Michelin
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Kumho Crugen HT51 | B · Toyo Celsius |
|---|---|---|
| Category | All Season | All Season |
| Vehicle type | SUV and 4x4 | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | 44 | 52 |
| Rim diameters | 15″ – 22″ | 14″ – 20″ |
| Tread depth | 12.5/32″ | 10 - 11/32″ |
| UTQG | 720 A A | 440 A A |
| Treadwear warranty | 70,000 mi | 60,000 mi |
| Sidewall | Blackwall | Black Side Wall |
| Max pressure | 50 psi | 50 - 51 psi |
| Sizes in common | 3 | 3 |
Which one should you actually buy?
Kumho Crugen HT51
Toyo Celsius
Winner: Kumho Crugen HT51 — better dry, noise and wet. Pick the Toyo Celsius if snow and treadwear matter most to you.
Kumho Crugen HT51 scores 74 vs 56 on dry.
Kumho Crugen HT51 scores 72 vs 56 on noise.
Kumho Crugen HT51 scores 76 vs 61 on wet.
Kumho Crugen HT51 scores 74 vs 64 on handling.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Crugen HT51 or Celsius?
Which is better in the wet, Crugen HT51 or Celsius?
Kumho Crugen HT51, 76 vs 61 on our wet score.
Which grips better on dry roads, Crugen HT51 or Celsius?
Kumho Crugen HT51, 74 vs 56 on our dry score.
Which is better in snow, Crugen HT51 or Celsius?
Toyo Celsius, 75 vs 70 on our snow score.
Which is quieter, Crugen HT51 or Celsius?
Kumho Crugen HT51, 72 vs 56 on our noise score.
Which is more comfortable, Crugen HT51 or Celsius?
Neither, by our numbers: 70 vs 69 on the comfort score, within 3 points.
Which lasts longer, Crugen HT51 or Celsius?
Toyo Celsius, 68 vs 65 on our treadwear score.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology