tirewheelguide

Yokohama Geolandar G055 Blue Earth looks discontinued: no new owner reviews or road tests in five years and no current EU tyre label.

Head-to-head Updated

Kumho Crugen HT51 vs Yokohama Geolandar G055 Blue Earth — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews. Based on 1 + 0 road tests and 164 + 12 owner reviews. How we score

Crugen HT51 is ahead, 72–61

Check price on Amazon · Crugen HT51 or Geolandar G055 Blue Earth on Amazon
Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Kumho Crugen HT51
Tire AKumho

Crugen HT51

All Season

Tests – · 1 test Owners 75 · 164 reviews

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 73

    Dry

    Crugen HT51 +12
    61
    Why this score
    SourceCrugen HT51Geolandar G055 Blue Earth
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 71 (est.)≈ 64 (est.)
    Reviews found online7758

    Crugen HT51: 60% × 71.3 (est.) + 40% × 76.5 = 73

    Geolandar G055 Blue Earth: 60% × 63.8 (est.) + 40% × 58 = 61

    No road tests of dry for Crugen HT51. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).

    No road tests of dry for Geolandar G055 Blue Earth. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).

  2. 75

    Wet

    Crugen HT51 +18
    57
    Why this score
    SourceCrugen HT51Geolandar G055 Blue Earth
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 74 (est.)≈ 60 (est.)
    Reviews found online7753

    Crugen HT51: 60% × 73.8 (est.) + 40% × 76.9 = 75

    Geolandar G055 Blue Earth: 60% × 60.3 (est.) + 40% × 52.9 = 57

    No road tests of wet for Crugen HT51. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).

    No road tests of wet for Geolandar G055 Blue Earth. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).

  3. 70

    Snow

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourceCrugen HT51Geolandar G055 Blue Earth
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 70 (est.)–
    Reviews found online70–

    Crugen HT51: 60% × 69.8 (est.) + 40% × 69.6 = 70

    No road tests of snow for Crugen HT51. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.33).

  4. 71

    Comfort

    Crugen HT51 +6
    65
    Why this score
    SourceCrugen HT51Geolandar G055 Blue Earth
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 70 (est.)≈ 68 (est.)
    Reviews found online7262

    Crugen HT51: 60% × 69.7 (est.) + 40% × 72.2 = 71

    Geolandar G055 Blue Earth: 60% × 67.9 (est.) + 40% × 61.8 = 65

    No road tests of comfort for Crugen HT51 or Geolandar G055 Blue Earth. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.

  5. 72

    Noise

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourceCrugen HT51Geolandar G055 Blue Earth
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 67 (est.)–
    Reviews found online78–

    Crugen HT51: 60% × 67.3 (est.) + 40% × 78.3 = 72

    No road tests of noise for Crugen HT51. The test half is the tested tires’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.

  6. 64

    Treadwear

    Geolandar G055 Blue Earth +1
    65
    Why this score
    SourceCrugen HT51Geolandar G055 Blue Earth
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / – tests58≈ 65 (est.)
    Reviews found online7464

    Crugen HT51: 60% × 57.7 + 40% × 74.1 = 64

    Geolandar G055 Blue Earth: 60% × 65.1 (est.) + 40% × 64 = 65

    No road tests of treadwear for Geolandar G055 Blue Earth. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).

  7. 75

    Handling (owners)

    Crugen HT51 +17
    58
    Why this score
    SourceCrugen HT51Geolandar G055 Blue Earth
    Reviews found online7558
Scores at a glance
CategoryKumho Crugen HT51Yokohama Geolandar G055 Blue Earth
Relative Score 72 61
Dry 73 61
Wet 75 57
Snow 70 –
Comfort 71 65
Noise 72 –
Treadwear 64 65
Handling (owners) 75 58

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score

Crugen HT51

Geolandar G055 Blue Earth

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Crugen HT51

Pros

  • Exceptional value and lower price point compared to premium competitors
  • Smooth, quiet, and comfortable highway ride
  • Strong dry, wet, and winter/snow traction

Cons

  • Slightly vague or 'squishy' steering feel/sidewall stiffness compared to some OEM tires
  • Potential negative impact on fuel economy (decreased MPG for some truck owners)
  • Occasional reports of accelerated shoulder wear or balancing issues
All owner themes in the Crugen HT51 review

Tire B Geolandar G055 Blue Earth

Pros

  • Extremely quiet and comfortable ride quality
  • Improved fuel economy and low rolling resistance
  • Adequate dry road grip and handling

Cons

  • Dangerous or unreliable wet weather traction, particularly lateral grip and cornering
  • Prone to wheel spin on damp or wet surfaces
  • Accelerated or uneven tread wear reported on certain crossover and SUV models
All owner themes in the Geolandar G055 Blue Earth review

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Kumho Crugen HT51 B · Yokohama Geolandar G055 Blue Earth
CategoryAll SeasonSummer
Vehicle typeSUV and 4x4SUV and 4x4
Sizes available44—
Rim diameters15″ – 22″—
Tread depth12.5/32″—
UTQG720 A A—
Treadwear warranty70,000 mi—
SidewallBlackwall—
Max pressure50 psi—

Which one should you actually buy?

Kumho Crugen HT51

Yokohama Geolandar G055 Blue Earth

Winner: Kumho Crugen HT51 — better wet, handling and dry. Where the Yokohama Geolandar G055 Blue Earth is ahead, it is by less than 3 points. Yokohama Geolandar G055 Blue Earth rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 12 reviews), so read this result as provisional.

Pick tire A Your priority is wet-weather safety

Kumho Crugen HT51 scores 75 vs 57 on wet.

Pick tire A You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Kumho Crugen HT51 scores 75 vs 58 on handling.

Pick tire A You want the most grip on dry roads

Kumho Crugen HT51 scores 73 vs 61 on dry.

Pick tire A You want the most comfortable ride

Kumho Crugen HT51 scores 71 vs 65 on comfort.

Tire A · Kumho Crugen HT51
Check price on Amazon
Tire B · Yokohama Geolandar G055 Blue Earth
Check price on Amazon

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Crugen HT51 or Geolandar G055 Blue Earth?

Which is better in the wet, Crugen HT51 or Geolandar G055 Blue Earth?

Kumho Crugen HT51, 75 vs 57 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, Crugen HT51 or Geolandar G055 Blue Earth?

Kumho Crugen HT51, 73 vs 61 on our dry score.

Which is more comfortable, Crugen HT51 or Geolandar G055 Blue Earth?

Kumho Crugen HT51, 71 vs 65 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, Crugen HT51 or Geolandar G055 Blue Earth?

Neither, by our numbers: 64 vs 65 on the treadwear score, within 3 points.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology