Tests – · none yet Owners 61 · 2,708 reviews
Yokohama Advan Neova AD08 looks discontinued: no new owner reviews or road tests in five years and no current EU tyre label.
Head-to-head
Updated
Kumho Ecowing ES01 KH27 vs Yokohama Advan Neova AD08 — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews. Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 2,708 + 31 owner reviews. How we score
Advan Neova AD08 is ahead, 71–63
Add your size for an exact match
/R
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests – · none yet Owners 69 · 31 reviews
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
62
Dry
Advan Neova AD08 +1375Why this score
Source Ecowing ES01 KH27 Advan Neova AD08 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 64 (est.) ≈ 73 (est.) Reviews found online 59 80 Ecowing ES01 KH27: 60% × 64.1 (est.) + 40% × 58.8 = 62
Advan Neova AD08: 60% × 72.5 (est.) + 40% × 79.7 = 75
No road tests of dry for Ecowing ES01 KH27. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).
No road tests of dry for Advan Neova AD08. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).
-
62
Wet
Advan Neova AD08 +769Why this score
Source Ecowing ES01 KH27 Advan Neova AD08 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 64 (est.) ≈ 69 (est.) Reviews found online 60 69 Ecowing ES01 KH27: 60% × 64.1 (est.) + 40% × 59.6 = 62
Advan Neova AD08: 60% × 69.1 (est.) + 40% × 68.5 = 69
No road tests of wet for Ecowing ES01 KH27. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).
No road tests of wet for Advan Neova AD08. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).
-
–
Snow
No comparison65Why this score
Source Ecowing ES01 KH27 Advan Neova AD08 Professional tests (TWG score) – ≈ 67 (est.) Reviews found online – 61 Advan Neova AD08: 60% × 67 (est.) + 40% × 61.3 = 65
No road tests of snow for Advan Neova AD08. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.33).
-
68
Comfort
Level68Why this score
Source Ecowing ES01 KH27 Advan Neova AD08 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 69 (est.) ≈ 69 (est.) Reviews found online 66 67 Ecowing ES01 KH27: 60% × 68.6 (est.) + 40% × 66.1 = 68
Advan Neova AD08: 60% × 68.7 (est.) + 40% × 66.6 = 68
No road tests of comfort for Ecowing ES01 KH27 or Advan Neova AD08. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
–
Noise
No comparison67Why this score
Source Ecowing ES01 KH27 Advan Neova AD08 Professional tests (TWG score) – ≈ 67 (est.) Reviews found online – 68 Advan Neova AD08: 60% × 67.3 (est.) + 40% × 67.8 = 67
No road tests of noise for Advan Neova AD08. The test half is the tested tires’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
65
Treadwear
Ecowing ES01 KH27 +263Why this score
Source Ecowing ES01 KH27 Advan Neova AD08 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 65 (est.) ≈ 64 (est.) Reviews found online 64 61 Ecowing ES01 KH27: 60% × 65.2 (est.) + 40% × 64.1 = 65
Advan Neova AD08: 60% × 64.3 (est.) + 40% × 61.2 = 63
No road tests of treadwear for Ecowing ES01 KH27. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).
No road tests of treadwear for Advan Neova AD08. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).
-
59
Handling (owners)
Advan Neova AD08 +2079Why this score
Source Ecowing ES01 KH27 Advan Neova AD08 Reviews found online 59 79
Scores at a glance
| Category | Kumho Ecowing ES01 KH27 | Yokohama Advan Neova AD08 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 63 | 71 |
| Dry | 62 | 75 |
| Wet | 62 | 69 |
| Snow | – | 65 |
| Comfort | 68 | 68 |
| Noise | – | 67 |
| Treadwear | 65 | 63 |
| Handling (owners) | 59 | 79 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score
63
/ 100
Ecowing ES01 KH27
71
/ 100
Advan Neova AD08
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
The professional test results behind the scores
Per discipline: the average % of the best tire over every test both tires were in, and how many of those tests each one won. “Different tests” rows compare results from separate tests.
| Discipline | Category | Ecowing ES01 KH27 | Advan Neova AD08 | Δ | Head-to-head |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Also published by the testers (not in the score) | |||||
| Overall Ranking | Overall | #6/16 2019 ADAC Summer Tyre Test - 185/65 R15 | #4/10 2014 EVO Max Performance Summer Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A Ecowing ES01 KH27
Pros
- Low road noise and quiet operation
- Smooth and comfortable ride quality
- Exceptional value for money and affordable pricing
Cons
- Inconsistent wet weather traction and a tendency to slip on damp roundabouts
- Softer sidewalls that can result in a vague or 'jelly-like' handling feel when pushed
- Lacks confidence for spirited or aggressive driving styles
Tire B Advan Neova AD08
Pros
- Phenomenal dry grip and cornering traction
- Exceptional steering feedback and crisp response
- Stiff, robust sidewall and carcass construction
Cons
- Prone to overheating and rubber degradation/chunking during heavy track use
- Reduced performance and aquaplaning tendencies in heavy standing water
- Limited size availability for larger rims
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Kumho Ecowing ES01 KH27 | B · Yokohama Advan Neova AD08 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer | Summer |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Tread depth | — | 9/32″ |
| UTQG | — | 180 A A |
| Sidewall | — | Blackwall |
| Max pressure | — | 51 psi |
Which one should you actually buy?
63
/ 100
Kumho Ecowing ES01 KH27
71
/ 100
Yokohama Advan Neova AD08
Winner: Yokohama Advan Neova AD08 — better handling, dry and wet. Where the Kumho Ecowing ES01 KH27 is ahead, it is by less than 3 points.
Pick tire B
You enjoy sharp, responsive handling
Yokohama Advan Neova AD08 scores 79 vs 59 on handling.
Pick tire B
You want the most grip on dry roads
Yokohama Advan Neova AD08 scores 75 vs 62 on dry.
Pick tire B
Your priority is wet-weather safety
Yokohama Advan Neova AD08 scores 69 vs 62 on wet.
Tire A · Kumho Ecowing ES01 KH27
Tire B · Yokohama Advan Neova AD08
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Ecowing ES01 KH27 or Advan Neova AD08?
Which is better in the wet, Ecowing ES01 KH27 or Advan Neova AD08?
Yokohama Advan Neova AD08, 69 vs 62 on our wet score.
Which grips better on dry roads, Ecowing ES01 KH27 or Advan Neova AD08?
Yokohama Advan Neova AD08, 75 vs 62 on our dry score.
Which is more comfortable, Ecowing ES01 KH27 or Advan Neova AD08?
Neither, by our numbers: 68 vs 68 on the comfort score, within 3 points.
Which lasts longer, Ecowing ES01 KH27 or Advan Neova AD08?
Neither, by our numbers: 65 vs 63 on the treadwear score, within 3 points.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology