Kumho Ecsta XS KU36 looks discontinued: no new owner reviews or road tests in five years and no current EU tyre label.

Head-to-head Updated

Kumho Ecsta LE Sport vs Kumho Ecsta XS KU36 — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 33 + 10 owner reviews. How we score

Ecsta XS KU36 is ahead, 69–62

Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Kumho Ecsta XS KU36
Tire BKumho

Ecsta XS KU36

Summer

± 8Provisional

Tests – · none yet Owners 68 · 10 reviews

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 61

    Dry

    Ecsta XS KU36 +11
    72
    Why this score
    SourceEcsta LE SportEcsta XS KU36
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 63 (est.)≈ 70 (est.)
    Reviews found online5773

    Ecsta LE Sport: 60% × 63.3 (est.) + 40% × 56.6 = 61

    Ecsta XS KU36: 60% × 70.3 (est.) + 40% × 73.4 = 72

    No road tests of dry for Ecsta LE Sport. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).

    No road tests of dry for Ecsta XS KU36. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).

  2. 65

    Wet

    Ecsta XS KU36 +5
    70
    Why this score
    SourceEcsta LE SportEcsta XS KU36
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 66 (est.)≈ 70 (est.)
    Reviews found online6369

    Ecsta LE Sport: 60% × 66.4 (est.) + 40% × 62.9 = 65

    Ecsta XS KU36: 60% × 69.8 (est.) + 40% × 69.1 = 70

    No road tests of wet for Ecsta LE Sport. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

    No road tests of wet for Ecsta XS KU36. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

  3. 62

    Comfort

    Ecsta LE Sport +1
    61
    Why this score
    SourceEcsta LE SportEcsta XS KU36
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 67 (est.)≈ 67 (est.)
    Reviews found online5958

    Ecsta LE Sport: 40% × 67.3 (est.) + 60% × 58.9 = 62

    Ecsta XS KU36: 40% × 67 (est.) + 60% × 57.5 = 61

    No road tests of comfort for Ecsta LE Sport or Ecsta XS KU36. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.

  4. 60

    Treadwear

    Ecsta XS KU36 +4
    64
    Why this score
    SourceEcsta LE SportEcsta XS KU36
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 62 (est.)≈ 65 (est.)
    Reviews found online5563

    Ecsta LE Sport: 60% × 62.3 (est.) + 40% × 55.3 = 60

    Ecsta XS KU36: 60% × 65 (est.) + 40% × 62.9 = 64

    No road tests of treadwear for Ecsta LE Sport. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).

    No road tests of treadwear for Ecsta XS KU36. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).

  5. 60

    Handling (owners)

    Ecsta XS KU36 +11
    71
    Why this score
    SourceEcsta LE SportEcsta XS KU36
    Reviews found online6071
Scores at a glance
Kumho Ecsta LE Sport vs Kumho Ecsta XS KU36: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryKumho Ecsta LE SportKumho Ecsta XS KU36
Relative Score 62 69
Dry 61 72
Wet 65 70
Comfort 62 61
Treadwear 60 64
Handling (owners) 60 71

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score
± 8

Ecsta LE Sport

± 8

Ecsta XS KU36

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Ecsta LE Sport

Pros

  • Exceptional value compared to premium tier brands
  • Strong dry and wet road grip when relatively new
  • Predictable and progressive handling limits near the edge

Cons

  • Rapid and uneven tread wear, particularly on front or driven wheels
  • Fragile sidewalls prone to bubbling or damage from minor impacts
  • Noticeable drop-off in performance and increased tramlining as the tread wears down
All owner themes in the Ecsta LE Sport review

Tire B Ecsta XS KU36

Pros

  • Exceptional dry surface grip and cornering confidence
  • Strong, rigid sidewall construction
  • High value-to-performance ratio

Cons

  • High levels of road noise that tend to worsen over time
  • Lack of steering precision and on-center feel
  • Rapid tread wear consistent with aggressive performance compounds
All owner themes in the Ecsta XS KU36 review

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Kumho Ecsta LE Sport B · Kumho Ecsta XS KU36
CategorySummerSummer
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover

Which one should you actually buy?

Kumho Ecsta LE Sport

Kumho Ecsta XS KU36

Winner: Kumho Ecsta XS KU36 — better dry, handling and wet. Where the Kumho Ecsta LE Sport is ahead, it is by less than 3 points. Kumho Ecsta XS KU36 rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 10 reviews), so read this result as provisional.

Pick tire B You want the most grip on dry roads

Kumho Ecsta XS KU36 scores 72 vs 61 on dry.

Pick tire B You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Kumho Ecsta XS KU36 scores 71 vs 60 on handling.

Pick tire B Your priority is wet-weather safety

Kumho Ecsta XS KU36 scores 70 vs 65 on wet.

Pick tire B You want the longest tread life

Kumho Ecsta XS KU36 scores 64 vs 60 on treadwear.

Tire A · Kumho Ecsta LE Sport
Tire B · Kumho Ecsta XS KU36

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Ecsta LE Sport or Ecsta XS KU36?

Which is better in the wet, Ecsta LE Sport or Ecsta XS KU36?

Kumho Ecsta XS KU36, 70 vs 65 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, Ecsta LE Sport or Ecsta XS KU36?

Kumho Ecsta XS KU36, 72 vs 61 on our dry score.

Which is more comfortable, Ecsta LE Sport or Ecsta XS KU36?

Neither, by our numbers: 62 vs 61 on the comfort score, within 3 points.

Which lasts longer, Ecsta LE Sport or Ecsta XS KU36?

Kumho Ecsta XS KU36, 64 vs 60 on our treadwear score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology