tirewheelguide
Head-to-head Updated

Kumho Ecsta PS31 vs Nexen CP672 — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): 60% professional tests, 40% owner reviews.

CP672 leads, 67–65 Narrow edge

Check price on Amazon · CP672 or Ecsta PS31 on Amazon
Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Tire AKumho

Ecsta PS31

Summer

Tests – · none yet Owners 64 · 259 reviews

Tire BNexen

CP672

All Season

Tests – · none yet Owners 66 · 83 reviews

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 64

    Dry

    CP672 +2
    66
    Why this score
    SourceEcsta PS31CP672
    Reviews found online6366
  2. 69

    Wet

    Ecsta PS31 +1
    68
    Why this score
    SourceEcsta PS31CP672
    Reviews found online6867
  3. 58

    Snow

    CP672 +10
    68
    Why this score
    SourceEcsta PS31CP672
    Reviews found online5067
  4. 67

    Comfort

    Level
    67
    Why this score
    SourceEcsta PS31CP672
    Reviews found online6565
  5. 67

    Noise

    CP672 +1
    68
    Why this score
    SourceEcsta PS31CP672
    Reviews found online6671
  6. 65

    Treadwear

    CP672 +1
    66
    Why this score
    SourceEcsta PS31CP672
    Reviews found online6567
  7. 67

    Handling

    Ecsta PS31 +2
    65
    Why this score
    SourceEcsta PS31CP672
    Reviews found online6765
Scores at a glance
CategoryKumho Ecsta PS31Nexen CP672
Relative Score 65 67
Dry 64 66
Wet 69 68
Snow 58 68
Comfort 67 67
Noise 67 68
Treadwear 65 66
Handling 67 65

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Less important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Less important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score

Ecsta PS31

CP672

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Ecsta PS31

Pros

  • Excellent price-to-performance ratio
  • High levels of ride comfort and low road noise
  • Strong dry traction for daily and spirited street driving

Cons

  • Soft sidewalls lead to vague steering response and 'squirm' during aggressive maneuvers
  • Inconsistent wet weather performance reported by some users, particularly in deep standing water
  • Tread life can be shorter than expected for some driving styles
All owner themes in the Ecsta PS31 review

Tire B CP672

Pros

  • Exceptional price-to-performance ratio and overall affordability
  • Low road noise providing a smooth, quiet, and comfortable ride
  • Impressive tread life and long-term durability

Cons

  • Subpar wet traction and occasional wheel spin reported by some drivers
  • Minor initial squishiness or lack of sharp initial steering bite on tight turns
  • Potential for accelerated shoulder wear if wheel alignment is not meticulously maintained
All owner themes in the CP672 review

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Kumho Ecsta PS31 B · Nexen CP672
CategorySummerAll Season
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover
Sizes available2141
Rim diameters15″ – 18″14″ – 18″
Tread depth10/32″9/32″
UTQG460 A A460 A A
Treadwear warranty—70,000 mi
SidewallBlackwallBlackwall
Max pressure51 psi44 psi

Which one should you actually buy?

Kumho Ecsta PS31

Nexen CP672

Winner: Nexen CP672 — better snow. It leads or ties in every category we score.

Pick tire B You drive through snowy winters

Nexen CP672 scores 68 vs 58 on snow.

Tire A · Kumho Ecsta PS31
Check price on Amazon
Tire B · Nexen CP672
Check price on Amazon

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.

67

Narrow edge

CP672

Amazon