Head-to-head Updated

Kumho Ecsta PS31 vs Nexen N Blue HD — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 259 + 14 owner reviews. How we score

Ecsta PS31 is ahead, 66–56

Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Kumho Ecsta PS31
Tire AKumho

Ecsta PS31

Summer

± 7

Tests – · none yet Owners 63 · 259 reviews

Nexen N Blue HD
Tire BNexen

N Blue HD

Summer

± 8Provisional

Tests – · none yet Owners 50 · 14 reviews

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 63

    Dry

    Ecsta PS31 +7
    56
    Why this score
    SourceEcsta PS31N Blue HD
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 65 (est.)≈ 60 (est.)
    Reviews found online6049

    Ecsta PS31: 60% × 64.6 (est.) + 40% × 59.7 = 63

    N Blue HD: 60% × 60.1 (est.) + 40% × 48.9 = 56

    No road tests of dry for Ecsta PS31. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).

    No road tests of dry for N Blue HD. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).

  2. 68

    Wet

    Ecsta PS31 +7
    61
    Why this score
    SourceEcsta PS31N Blue HD
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 69 (est.)≈ 64 (est.)
    Reviews found online6858

    Ecsta PS31: 60% × 69 (est.) + 40% × 67.6 = 68

    N Blue HD: 60% × 63.6 (est.) + 40% × 57.7 = 61

    No road tests of wet for Ecsta PS31. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

    No road tests of wet for N Blue HD. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

  3. 58

    Snow

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourceEcsta PS31N Blue HD
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 64 (est.)–
    Reviews found online49–

    Ecsta PS31: 60% × 63.7 (est.) + 40% × 49.2 = 58

    No road tests of snow for Ecsta PS31. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).

  4. 65

    Comfort

    Ecsta PS31 +14
    51
    Why this score
    SourceEcsta PS31N Blue HD
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 68 (est.)≈ 64 (est.)
    Reviews found online6443

    Ecsta PS31: 40% × 67.7 (est.) + 60% × 63.9 = 65

    N Blue HD: 40% × 63.5 (est.) + 60% × 43.2 = 51

    No road tests of comfort for Ecsta PS31. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).

    No road tests of comfort for N Blue HD. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).

  5. 66

    Noise

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourceEcsta PS31N Blue HD
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 66 (est.)–
    Reviews found online66–

    Ecsta PS31: 60% × 66.4 (est.) + 40% × 66.3 = 66

    No road tests of noise for Ecsta PS31. The test half is the tested tires’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.

  6. 65

    Treadwear

    Ecsta PS31 +11
    54
    Why this score
    SourceEcsta PS31N Blue HD
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 66 (est.)≈ 59 (est.)
    Reviews found online6546

    Ecsta PS31: 60% × 65.9 (est.) + 40% × 64.8 = 65

    N Blue HD: 60% × 58.9 (est.) + 40% × 45.5 = 54

    No road tests of treadwear for Ecsta PS31. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).

    No road tests of treadwear for N Blue HD. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).

  7. 68

    Handling (owners)

    Ecsta PS31 +21
    47
    Why this score
    SourceEcsta PS31N Blue HD
    Reviews found online6847
Scores at a glance
Kumho Ecsta PS31 vs Nexen N Blue HD: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryKumho Ecsta PS31Nexen N Blue HD
Relative Score 66 56
Dry 63 56
Wet 68 61
Snow 58 –
Comfort 65 51
Noise 66 –
Treadwear 65 54
Handling (owners) 68 47

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score
± 7

Ecsta PS31

± 8

N Blue HD

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Ecsta PS31

Pros

  • Excellent price-to-performance ratio
  • High levels of ride comfort and low road noise
  • Strong dry traction for daily and spirited street driving

Cons

  • Soft sidewalls lead to vague steering response and 'squirm' during aggressive maneuvers
  • Inconsistent wet weather performance reported by some users, particularly in deep standing water
  • Tread life can be shorter than expected for some driving styles
All owner themes in the Ecsta PS31 review

Tire B N Blue HD

Pros

  • Good initial wet and dry grip when new
  • Attractive budget-friendly price point
  • Decent fuel economy and highway stability early in their lifecycle

Cons

  • Significant increase in road noise as the tires wear down
  • Rapid degradation of grip in wet and dry conditions after initial mileage
  • Shorter than expected tread life, especially on front axles
All owner themes in the N Blue HD review

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Kumho Ecsta PS31 B · Nexen N Blue HD
CategorySummerSummer
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover
Sizes available215
Rim diameters15″ – 18″15″ – 18″
Tread depth10/32″—
UTQG460 A A—
SidewallBlackwall—
Max pressure51 psi—
Sizes in common22

Which one should you actually buy?

Kumho Ecsta PS31

Nexen N Blue HD

Winner: Kumho Ecsta PS31 — better handling, comfort and treadwear. It leads or ties in every category we score. Nexen N Blue HD rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 14 reviews), so read this result as provisional.

Pick tire A You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Kumho Ecsta PS31 scores 68 vs 47 on handling.

Pick tire A You want the most comfortable ride

Kumho Ecsta PS31 scores 65 vs 51 on comfort.

Pick tire A You want the longest tread life

Kumho Ecsta PS31 scores 65 vs 54 on treadwear.

Pick tire A You want the most grip on dry roads

Kumho Ecsta PS31 scores 63 vs 56 on dry.

Tire A · Kumho Ecsta PS31
Tire B · Nexen N Blue HD

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Ecsta PS31 or N Blue HD?

Which is better in the wet, Ecsta PS31 or N Blue HD?

Kumho Ecsta PS31, 68 vs 61 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, Ecsta PS31 or N Blue HD?

Kumho Ecsta PS31, 63 vs 56 on our dry score.

Which is more comfortable, Ecsta PS31 or N Blue HD?

Kumho Ecsta PS31, 65 vs 51 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, Ecsta PS31 or N Blue HD?

Kumho Ecsta PS31, 65 vs 54 on our treadwear score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology