tirewheelguide
Head-to-head Updated

Kumho Ecsta PS71 vs Nexen CP672 — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 14 + 0 road tests and 8,191 + 83 owner reviews. How we score

Ecsta PS71 leads, 70–66 Narrow edge

Check price on Amazon · Ecsta PS71 or CP672 on Amazon
Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Kumho Ecsta PS71
Tire AKumho

Ecsta PS71

Summer

± 5

Tests 68 · 14 tests Owners 69 · 8,191 reviews

Best test result: #1 of 18 in 2025 ADAC Summer Tyre Test (straight aquaplaning)

“Those are Kumho Ecsta PS71s, thread width is supposed to be 245mm, the actual one is hardly 235. How so?”

Nexen CP672
Tire BNexen

CP672

All Season

± 7

Tests – · none yet Owners 65 · 83 reviews

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 75

    Dry

    Ecsta PS71 +9
    66
    Why this score
    SourceEcsta PS71CP672
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 12 / – tests78≈ 67 (est.)
    Reviews found online7265

    Ecsta PS71: 60% × 77.6 + 40% × 71.7 = 75

    CP672: 60% × 66.7 (est.) + 40% × 64.9 = 66

    No road tests of dry for CP672. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).

  2. 85

    Wet

    Ecsta PS71 +19
    66
    Why this score
    SourceEcsta PS71CP672
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 13 / – tests92≈ 67 (est.)
    Reviews found online7564

    Ecsta PS71: 60% × 91.8 + 40% × 74.6 = 85

    CP672: 60% × 67.2 (est.) + 40% × 64.2 = 66

    No road tests of wet for CP672. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

  3. –

    Snow

    No comparison
    67
    Why this score
    SourceEcsta PS71CP672
    Professional tests (TWG score)–≈ 69 (est.)
    Reviews found online–65

    CP672: 60% × 68.7 (est.) + 40% × 64.7 = 67

    No road tests of snow for CP672. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).

  4. 69

    Comfort

    Ecsta PS71 +5
    64
    Why this score
    SourceEcsta PS71CP672
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 2 / – tests75≈ 67 (est.)
    Reviews found online6562

    Ecsta PS71: 40% × 74.6 + 60% × 65.3 = 69

    CP672: 40% × 67.3 (est.) + 60% × 62 = 64

    No road tests of comfort for CP672. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.

  5. 36

    Noise

    CP672 +32
    68
    Why this score
    SourceEcsta PS71CP672
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 8 / – tests16≈ 66 (est.)
    Reviews found online≈ 66 (est.)71

    Ecsta PS71: 60% × 15.6 + 40% × 66.4 (est.) = 36

    CP672: 60% × 66.4 (est.) + 40% × 70.7 = 68

    No owner ratings of noise for Ecsta PS71. The owner half is the owners’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests, so the tests say nothing about how owners would rate it.

    No road tests of noise for CP672. The test half is the tested tires’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.

  6. 52

    Treadwear

    CP672 +14
    66
    Why this score
    SourceEcsta PS71CP672
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 6 / – tests46≈ 66 (est.)
    Reviews found online6066

    Ecsta PS71: 60% × 46 + 40% × 59.8 = 52

    CP672: 60% × 66.3 (est.) + 40% × 65.8 = 66

    No road tests of treadwear for CP672. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).

  7. 73

    Handling (owners)

    Ecsta PS71 +11
    62
    Why this score
    SourceEcsta PS71CP672
    Reviews found online7362
  8. 48

    Efficiency

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourceEcsta PS71CP672
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 7 / – tests48–
Scores at a glance
CategoryKumho Ecsta PS71Nexen CP672
Relative Score 70 66
Dry 75 66
Wet 85 66
Snow – 67
Comfort 69 64
Noise 36 68
Treadwear 52 66
Handling (owners) 73 62
Efficiency 48 –

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Not important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Recomputed
Headline score
± 5

Ecsta PS71

± 7

CP672

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Ecsta PS71

Pros

  • Outstanding wet weather grip and aquaplaning resistance
  • High value for money compared to tier-one premium brands
  • Predictable handling and solid cornering stability in both dry and wet conditions

Cons

  • Noticeable road noise or droning at motorway speeds on certain vehicles
  • Occasional reports of balancing difficulties or out-of-round/egg-shaped tires
  • Softer sidewalls can lead to slightly vague steering response around center or tread block movement
All owner themes in the Ecsta PS71 review

Tire B CP672

Pros

  • Exceptional price-to-performance ratio and overall affordability
  • Low road noise providing a smooth, quiet, and comfortable ride
  • Impressive tread life and long-term durability

Cons

  • Subpar wet traction and occasional wheel spin reported by some drivers
  • Minor initial squishiness or lack of sharp initial steering bite on tight turns
  • Potential for accelerated shoulder wear if wheel alignment is not meticulously maintained
All owner themes in the CP672 review

What real owners are saying

From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score

Tire A

Kumho Ecsta PS71

Positive

Community members generally view the Kumho Ecsta PS71 as a capable and reliable mid-range ultra-high performance tire offering solid grip and value for money compared to premium alternatives. While perceived as good once warmed up, some drivers note that it does not quite reach the ultimate grip level of top-tier brands and question its tread wear longevity.

z4-forum.com ·2023-01-29

“Steve; have a look at Kuhmo Ecsta PS71s. I just fitted a set on my new wheels for my 440i. Weapon of choice for the 'non tyre snob' IMHO. Much cheaper than the 'big' brands, heat up quickly and they also look really nice (for a black round tyre). Can't comment on noise, as the exhaust on mine is so noisy I can't hear the radio, let alone tyres!”
r/tires ·5 upvotes ·2022-10-17

“Those are Kumho Ecsta PS71s, thread width is supposed to be 245mm, the actual one is hardly 235. How so?”
bimmerforums.co.uk ·1 upvote ·2024-05-05

“On Blackcircles all the 245/40 R19 ditch finders cost around £100 and have a poor wet grip & all the decent mid range cost around £170 and have A rated wet grip. Would you risk it for £240? I know I wouldn't. The cheapest A wet rated is a Kuhmo Ecsta PS71 at £136 if you really want to keep the cost down. If you want a relatively soft comfortable tyre then a Hankook S1 Evo 3 is an excellent choice.”
Top themes
#value for money#wet and dry grip#tire wear longevity#sporty handling performance#warm up temperature behavior#mid-range alternative comparison

Based on 23 community posts

Tire B

Nexen CP672

We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Kumho Ecsta PS71 B · Nexen CP672
CategorySummerAll Season
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover
Sizes available13341
Rim diameters16″ – 22″14″ – 18″
Tread depth—9/32″
UTQG—460 A A
Treadwear warranty—70,000 mi
SidewallBlackwallBlackwall
Max pressure—44 psi
Sizes in common2020

Which one should you actually buy?

Kumho Ecsta PS71

Nexen CP672

Narrow edge: Kumho Ecsta PS71 — better wet, handling and dry. Pick the Nexen CP672 if noise and treadwear matter most to you.

Pick tire B You want a quieter cabin

Nexen CP672 scores 68 vs 36 on noise.

Pick tire A Your priority is wet-weather safety

Kumho Ecsta PS71 scores 85 vs 66 on wet.

Pick tire B You want the longest tread life

Nexen CP672 scores 66 vs 52 on treadwear.

Pick tire A You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Kumho Ecsta PS71 scores 73 vs 62 on handling.

Tire A · Kumho Ecsta PS71
Check price on Amazon
Tire B · Nexen CP672
Check price on Amazon

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Ecsta PS71 or CP672?

Which is better in the wet, Ecsta PS71 or CP672?

Kumho Ecsta PS71, 85 vs 66 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, Ecsta PS71 or CP672?

Kumho Ecsta PS71, 75 vs 66 on our dry score.

Which is quieter, Ecsta PS71 or CP672?

Nexen CP672, 68 vs 36 on our noise score.

Which is more comfortable, Ecsta PS71 or CP672?

Kumho Ecsta PS71, 69 vs 64 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, Ecsta PS71 or CP672?

Nexen CP672, 66 vs 52 on our treadwear score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology