Head-to-head Updated

Kumho Ecsta PS71 vs Nexen N Blue ECO — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews. Based on 14 + 0 road tests and 8,168 + 36 owner reviews. How we score

Ecsta PS71 is ahead, 73–66

Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Kumho Ecsta PS71
Tire AKumho

Ecsta PS71

Summer

Tests 67 · 14 tests Owners 69 · 8,168 reviews

Best test result: #1 of 18 in 2025 ADAC Summer Tyre Test (straight aquaplaning)

“Those are Kumho Ecsta PS71s, thread width is supposed to be 245mm, the actual one is hardly 235. How so?”

Nexen N Blue ECO
Tire BNexen

N Blue ECO

Summer

Tests – · none yet Owners 64 · 36 reviews

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 75

    Dry

    Ecsta PS71 +9
    66
    Why this score
    SourceEcsta PS71N Blue ECO
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 12 / – tests77≈ 67 (est.)
    Reviews found online7166

    Ecsta PS71: 60% × 77.3 + 40% × 71 = 75

    N Blue ECO: 60% × 66.9 (est.) + 40% × 65.6 = 66

    No road tests of dry for N Blue ECO. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).

  2. 84

    Wet

    Ecsta PS71 +15
    69
    Why this score
    SourceEcsta PS71N Blue ECO
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 13 / – tests91≈ 69 (est.)
    Reviews found online7369

    Ecsta PS71: 60% × 90.9 + 40% × 73.1 = 84

    N Blue ECO: 60% × 69.5 (est.) + 40% × 69.2 = 69

    No road tests of wet for N Blue ECO. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).

  3. 71

    Comfort

    Ecsta PS71 +5
    66
    Why this score
    SourceEcsta PS71N Blue ECO
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 2 / – tests75≈ 68 (est.)
    Reviews found online6563

    Ecsta PS71: 60% × 75.2 + 40% × 64.8 = 71

    N Blue ECO: 60% × 68.1 (est.) + 40% × 62.9 = 66

    No road tests of comfort for N Blue ECO. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.

  4. 36

    Noise

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourceEcsta PS71N Blue ECO
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 8 / – tests15–
    Reviews found online≈ 67 (est.)–

    Ecsta PS71: 60% × 15.5 + 40% × 67.3 (est.) = 36

    No owner ratings of noise for Ecsta PS71. The owner half is the owners’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests, so the tests say nothing about how owners would rate it.

  5. 52

    Treadwear

    N Blue ECO +8
    60
    Why this score
    SourceEcsta PS71N Blue ECO
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 6 / – tests45≈ 63 (est.)
    Reviews found online6356

    Ecsta PS71: 60% × 45.1 + 40% × 62.5 = 52

    N Blue ECO: 60% × 62.8 (est.) + 40% × 56.4 = 60

    No road tests of treadwear for N Blue ECO. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).

  6. 71

    Handling (owners)

    Ecsta PS71 +5
    66
    Why this score
    SourceEcsta PS71N Blue ECO
    Reviews found online7166
Scores at a glance
Kumho Ecsta PS71 vs Nexen N Blue ECO: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryKumho Ecsta PS71Nexen N Blue ECO
Relative Score 73 66
Dry 75 66
Wet 84 69
Comfort 71 66
Noise 36 –
Treadwear 52 60
Handling (owners) 71 66

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score

Ecsta PS71

N Blue ECO

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

The professional test results behind the scores

Per discipline: the average % of the best tire over every test both tires were in, and how many of those tests each one won. “Different tests” rows compare results from separate tests.

DisciplineCategoryEcsta PS71N Blue ECOΔHead-to-head
Also published by the testers (not in the score)
Overall Ranking Overall #4/52 2025 Summer Tyre Test Shootout #15/16 2013 ACE Summer Touring Tyre Test – Different tests

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Ecsta PS71

Pros

  • Outstanding wet weather grip and aquaplaning resistance
  • High value for money compared to tier-one premium brands
  • Predictable handling and solid cornering stability in both dry and wet conditions

Cons

  • Noticeable road noise or droning at motorway speeds on certain vehicles
  • Occasional reports of balancing difficulties or out-of-round/egg-shaped tires
  • Softer sidewalls can lead to slightly vague steering response around center or tread block movement
All owner themes in the Ecsta PS71 review

Tire B N Blue ECO

Pros

  • Excellent value for money and budget-friendly purchase price
  • Strong grip and handling in both wet and dry conditions
  • Good ride comfort and relatively low road noise

Cons

  • Rapid or uneven tread wear reported by several users
  • Premature rubber cracking and perishing observed over time
  • Polarizing opinions on wet weather traction and braking distance
All owner themes in the N Blue ECO review

What real owners are saying

From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score

Tire A

Kumho Ecsta PS71

Positive

Community sentiment towards the Kumho Ecsta PS71 is generally positive, with drivers viewing it as an affordable, high-value mid-range/UHP tire that performs reliably compared to premium brands. Users praise its wet grip rating, competitive pricing, and overall road manners once warmed up, though some note it provides adequate rather than top-tier grip and raise questions regarding cold performance and tread life.

Top themes
#Value for money#Wet grip performance#UHP budget alternative#Tread wear durability#Warm-up temperature behavior#Tire pressure specifications

Based on 24 community posts

Tire B

Nexen N Blue ECO

We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Kumho Ecsta PS71 B · Nexen N Blue ECO
CategorySummerSummer
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover
Sizes available13324
Rim diameters16″ – 22″13″ – 16″
SidewallBlackwall—
Sizes in common33

Which one should you actually buy?

Kumho Ecsta PS71

Nexen N Blue ECO

Winner: Kumho Ecsta PS71 — better wet, dry and comfort. Pick the Nexen N Blue ECO if treadwear matters most to you.

Pick tire A Your priority is wet-weather safety

Kumho Ecsta PS71 scores 84 vs 69 on wet.

Pick tire A You want the most grip on dry roads

Kumho Ecsta PS71 scores 75 vs 66 on dry.

Pick tire B You want the longest tread life

Nexen N Blue ECO scores 60 vs 52 on treadwear.

Pick tire A You want the most comfortable ride

Kumho Ecsta PS71 scores 71 vs 66 on comfort.

Tire A · Kumho Ecsta PS71
Tire B · Nexen N Blue ECO

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Ecsta PS71 or N Blue ECO?

Which is better in the wet, Ecsta PS71 or N Blue ECO?

Kumho Ecsta PS71, 84 vs 69 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, Ecsta PS71 or N Blue ECO?

Kumho Ecsta PS71, 75 vs 66 on our dry score.

Which is more comfortable, Ecsta PS71 or N Blue ECO?

Kumho Ecsta PS71, 71 vs 66 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, Ecsta PS71 or N Blue ECO?

Nexen N Blue ECO, 60 vs 52 on our treadwear score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology