Head-to-head Updated

Kumho Ecsta PS91 vs Kumho Ecsta Sport PS72 — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 6 + 8 road tests and 485 + 1,068 owner reviews. How we score

Ecsta Sport PS72 is ahead, 81–61

Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Kumho Ecsta PS91
Tire AKumho

Ecsta PS91

Summer

± 5

Tests 77 · 6 tests Owners 42 · 485 reviews

Best test result: #1 of 11 in 2023 AUTO Straßenverkehr 2023 Summer Tire Test R18 (exterior noise)

“Putting some Kumho Ecsta PS91s on. Curious how they’ll do since my go to Falken rt660 doesn’t come in the oem 18” sizes”

Kumho Ecsta Sport PS72
Tire BKumho

Ecsta Sport PS72

Summer

± 6

Tests 78 · 8 tests Owners 83 · 1,068 reviews

Best test result: #1 of 20 in 2026 Autobild Summer Tyre Test (wet handling (tester's mark))

“Ako ides na Kumho onda dodaj par eura gore po gumi i uzmi Ecsta Sport S PS72. Puno bolja guma od bazne ecste”

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 66

    Dry

    Ecsta Sport PS72 +20
    86
    Why this score
    SourceEcsta PS91Ecsta Sport PS72
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 6 / 8 tests7787
    Reviews found online5185

    Ecsta PS91: 60% × 76.7 + 40% × 50.9 = 66

    Ecsta Sport PS72: 60% × 86.6 + 40% × 85.3 = 86

  2. 68

    Wet

    Ecsta Sport PS72 +20
    88
    Why this score
    SourceEcsta PS91Ecsta Sport PS72
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 6 / 8 tests7988
    Reviews found online5288

    Ecsta PS91: 60% × 78.7 + 40% × 51.5 = 68

    Ecsta Sport PS72: 60% × 88.1 + 40% × 87.5 = 88

  3. 38

    Snow

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourceEcsta PS91Ecsta Sport PS72
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 53 (est.)–
    Reviews found online15–

    Ecsta PS91: 60% × 52.9 (est.) + 40% × 15 = 38

    No road tests of snow for Ecsta PS91. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).

  4. 54

    Comfort

    Ecsta Sport PS72 +14
    68
    Why this score
    SourceEcsta PS91Ecsta Sport PS72
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 5 tests≈ 64 (est.)58
    Reviews found online4875

    Ecsta PS91: 40% × 64.4 (est.) + 60% × 47.7 = 54

    Ecsta Sport PS72: 40% × 57.9 + 60% × 75.4 = 68

    No road tests of comfort for Ecsta PS91. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).

  5. 62

    Noise

    Ecsta Sport PS72 +2
    64
    Why this score
    SourceEcsta PS91Ecsta Sport PS72
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 3 / 7 tests7063
    Reviews found online50≈ 66 (est.)

    Ecsta PS91: 60% × 70.2 + 40% × 49.6 = 62

    Ecsta Sport PS72: 60% × 62.5 + 40% × 66.4 (est.) = 64

    No owner ratings of noise for Ecsta Sport PS72. The owner half is the owners’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests, so the tests say nothing about how owners would rate it.

  6. 44

    Treadwear

    Ecsta Sport PS72 +29
    73
    Why this score
    SourceEcsta PS91Ecsta Sport PS72
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests≈ 53 (est.)70
    Reviews found online3078

    Ecsta PS91: 60% × 53.4 (est.) + 40% × 30.2 = 44

    Ecsta Sport PS72: 60% × 69.9 + 40% × 78 = 73

    No road tests of treadwear for Ecsta PS91. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).

  7. 53

    Handling (owners)

    Ecsta Sport PS72 +33
    86
    Why this score
    SourceEcsta PS91Ecsta Sport PS72
    Reviews found online5386
  8. 47

    Efficiency

    Ecsta Sport PS72 +24
    71
    Why this score
    SourceEcsta PS91Ecsta Sport PS72
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 3 / 5 tests4771
Scores at a glance
Kumho Ecsta PS91 vs Kumho Ecsta Sport PS72: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryKumho Ecsta PS91Kumho Ecsta Sport PS72
Relative Score 61 81
Dry 66 86
Wet 68 88
Snow 38 –
Comfort 54 68
Noise 62 64
Treadwear 44 73
Handling (owners) 53 86
Efficiency 47 71

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Not important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score
± 5

Ecsta PS91

± 6

Ecsta Sport PS72

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

The professional test results behind the scores

Per discipline: the average % of the best tire over every test both tires were in, and how many of those tests each one won. “Different tests” rows compare results from separate tests.

DisciplineCategoryEcsta PS91Ecsta Sport PS72ΔHead-to-head
Dry Braking Dry 80% #5/10 · 2023 AUTO Straßenverkehr 2023 Summer Tire Test R18 95% #9/50 · 2026 Summer Braking Super Tyre Test - How do 52 Tyres Perform in Wet and Dry Braking? – Different tests
Dry Handling Dry 98% #7/10 · 2023 AZ UHP Summer Tyre Test 99% #3/4 · 2026 AutoView Value Sport Tyre Test – Different tests
Dry Handling (tester's mark) Dry 70% #8/10 · 2023 AUTO Straßenverkehr 2023 Summer Tire Test R18 88% #4/4 · 2026 AutoView Value Sport Tyre Test – Different tests
Curved Aquaplaning Wet 90% #3/10 · 2023 AUTO Straßenverkehr 2023 Summer Tire Test R18 94% #5/9 · 2026 Summer SUV Tyre Test – Different tests
Straight Aquaplaning Wet 80% #7/10 · 2023 AUTO Straßenverkehr 2023 Summer Tire Test R18 96% #14/20 · 2026 Autobild Summer Tyre Test – Different tests
Wet Braking Wet 70% #9/10 · 2023 AUTO Straßenverkehr 2023 Summer Tire Test R18 93% #4/50 · 2026 Summer Braking Super Tyre Test - How do 52 Tyres Perform in Wet and Dry Braking? – Different tests
Wet Circle Wet 70% #4/10 · 2023 AUTO Straßenverkehr 2023 Summer Tire Test R18 96% #8/9 · 2026 Summer SUV Tyre Test – Different tests
Wet Handling Wet 97% #5/10 · 2023 AZ UHP Summer Tyre Test 99% #5/20 · 2026 Autobild Summer Tyre Test – Different tests
Wet Handling (tester's mark) Wet 78% #6/10 · 2023 AUTO Straßenverkehr 2023 Summer Tire Test R18 100% #1/20 · 2026 Autobild Summer Tyre Test – Different tests
Noise Noise 94% #8/10 · 2023 AZ UHP Summer Tyre Test 100% #1/4 · 2026 AutoView Value Sport Tyre Test – Different tests
Rolling Resistance Efficiency 70% #5/10 · 2023 AUTO Straßenverkehr 2023 Summer Tire Test R18 82% #12/20 · 2026 Autobild Summer Tyre Test – Different tests
Also published by the testers (not in the score)
Overall Ranking Overall #9/10 2023 AUTO Straßenverkehr 2023 Summer Tire Test R18 #7/10 2026 ACE Summer Tyre Test – Different tests

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Ecsta PS91

Pros

  • Exceptional dry and wet grip providing high confidence during spirited driving
  • Significantly more affordable than premium flagship alternatives while offering comparable performance
  • Stiff sidewalls enhance steering response, cornering stability, and feedback

Cons

  • Accelerated tread wear and shorter lifespan, particularly with aggressive driving or on heavier vehicles
  • Stiff sidewalls result in a firmer, less comfortable ride that transmits road imperfections
  • Tendency to tramline or follow road grooves on straight highways
All owner themes in the Ecsta PS91 review

Tire B Ecsta Sport PS72

Pros

  • Exceptional value and significantly lower price point compared to tier-one premium brands
  • Strong and predictable grip in both wet and dry conditions
  • Quieter road noise and high ride comfort relative to other performance tires

Cons

  • Occasional reports of out-of-round tires causing persistent vibrations at highway speeds
  • Stiffer sidewalls can result in a firmer ride or slight tracking issues when cold
  • Some users noted faster-than-expected wear under aggressive, spirited driving conditions
All owner themes in the Ecsta Sport PS72 review

What real owners are saying

From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score

Tire A

Kumho Ecsta PS91

Mixed

The community views the Kumho Ecsta PS91 as an attractive, budget-friendly max performance summer tire that offers decent street traction, low noise, and a tread pattern resembling higher-end options like Michelin. However, opinions are split; while some drivers praise them as a great value alternative for daily driving and light spirited use, enthusiasts note limitations regarding rapid wear, subpar track endurance, and inferior grip compared to top-tier performance tires.

Top themes
#Budget friendly pricing#Street performance and comfort#Tread wear and longevity#Track and grip limitations#Comparison to Michelin

Based on 46 community posts

Tire B

Kumho Ecsta Sport PS72

Positive

Community sentiment toward the Kumho Ecsta Sport PS72 is largely positive, with drivers praising its impressive dry and wet grip, responsive handling, and low cabin noise compared to premium alternatives like the Michelin Pilot Sport series. Most owners view it as an outstanding value proposition, offering near-flagship performance at a significantly lower price point. Minor criticisms focus on potential treadwear longevity, lack of rim protection, mixed feedback on highway noise, and occasional wheel balance or vibration issues.

civicxi.com ·2026-01-19

“Anyone else running these tires? Is it possible the tire(s) out of round? New hypergram wheels/new tires w/ aluminum hubcentric rings. Has vibrations, but most noticed front right. Balanced again same thing. Took the hub rings off with significant decrease but still there. Will try again with plastic rings followed by swapping wheels front to rear. If still going on will have to live with it”

r/elektrischrijden ·1 upvote ·2026-09-02

“Ik heb nog een paar nieuwe banden liggen voor die maat. Continental PremiumContact 7. Had je voor heel weinig mogen hebben. Die zijn echt wel beter dan die Hankooks. Overigens hoeft een goede band niet heel duur te zijn. Ik was zelf niet tevreden mer Hankook. De laatste nieuwe banden die ik heb laten monteren waren Kumho's Ecsta sport PS72. Die zijn weliswaar goedkoop, maar komen uitstekend uit veel testen. Ze hebben ook echt meer grip dan de Hankooks en Vredesteins die ik hiervoor had.”

r/F30 ·6 upvotes ·2026-06-07

“Michelin PS5 vs Continental SC 7 vs Kumho PS72 for 437 wheels Looking for new tires for my F30 330i on 437M wheels (225/40R19 & 255/35R19). Main priorities are comfort, steering feel, low noise, and good grip for spirited driving. I’ve previously run Michelin PS5 and loved them, although they got a bit noisy over time. Now I’m deciding between: Michelin PS5 Continental SportContact 7 Kumho PS72 The Kumhos are much cheaper and reviews seem very positive. Are they really close to the PS5/SC7, or is it worth spending more?”

Top themes
#value for money#dry and wet grip#low road noise#Michelin PS4 comparison#balancing and vibration#ride comfort compliance#treadwear longevity

Based on 33 community posts

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Kumho Ecsta PS91 B · Kumho Ecsta Sport PS72
CategorySummerSummer
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover
Sizes available150
Rim diameters19″17″ – 21″
Tread depth9.5/32″9.4/32″
UTQG260 A A320 A A
Treadwear warranty—30,000 mi
SidewallBlackwallBlackwall
Max pressure50 psi50 psi

Which one should you actually buy?

Kumho Ecsta PS91

Kumho Ecsta Sport PS72

Winner: Kumho Ecsta Sport PS72 — better handling, treadwear and efficiency. It leads or ties in every category we score.

Pick tire B You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Kumho Ecsta Sport PS72 scores 86 vs 53 on handling.

Pick tire B You want the longest tread life

Kumho Ecsta Sport PS72 scores 73 vs 44 on treadwear.

Pick tire B You want lower fuel or energy use

Kumho Ecsta Sport PS72 scores 71 vs 47 on efficiency.

Pick tire B You want the most grip on dry roads

Kumho Ecsta Sport PS72 scores 86 vs 66 on dry.

Tire A · Kumho Ecsta PS91
Tire B · Kumho Ecsta Sport PS72

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Ecsta PS91 or Ecsta Sport PS72?

Which is better in the wet, Ecsta PS91 or Ecsta Sport PS72?

Kumho Ecsta Sport PS72, 88 vs 68 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, Ecsta PS91 or Ecsta Sport PS72?

Kumho Ecsta Sport PS72, 86 vs 66 on our dry score.

Which is quieter, Ecsta PS91 or Ecsta Sport PS72?

Neither, by our numbers: 62 vs 64 on the noise score, within 3 points.

Which is more comfortable, Ecsta PS91 or Ecsta Sport PS72?

Kumho Ecsta Sport PS72, 68 vs 54 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, Ecsta PS91 or Ecsta Sport PS72?

Kumho Ecsta Sport PS72, 73 vs 44 on our treadwear score.

Which rolls more easily, Ecsta PS91 or Ecsta Sport PS72?

Kumho Ecsta Sport PS72, 71 vs 47 on our efficiency score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology