Tests – · none yet Owners 53 · 435 reviews
Head-to-head
Updated
Kumho KL33 vs Vredestein Quatrac Pro+ — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 14 road tests and 435 + 865 owner reviews. How we score
Quatrac Pro+ is ahead, 72–59
Add your size for an exact match
/R
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests 69 · 14 tests Owners 73 · 865 reviews
Best test result: #1 of 10 in 2024 Auto Bild SUV All Season Tyre Test (wet braking)
“2024 Prius XLE w/17in. wheel and tire downsize. I recently swapped out the 19in OEM wheels and tires for 225/55r17 Verdestien Quatrac Pro+ mounted on Borbet Type W wheels (anthracite). I don't have a ton of mileage on them, but so far, I'm pretty happy with the results. Read more”
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
60
Dry
Quatrac Pro+ +767Why this score
Source KL33 Quatrac Pro+ Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 13 tests ≈ 63 (est.) 62 Reviews found online 55 76 KL33: 60% × 62.7 (est.) + 40% × 55.4 = 60
Quatrac Pro+: 60% × 61.6 + 40% × 75.9 = 67
No road tests of dry for KL33. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).
-
63
Wet
Quatrac Pro+ +1881Why this score
Source KL33 Quatrac Pro+ Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 13 tests ≈ 65 (est.) 80 Reviews found online 60 81 KL33: 60% × 64.6 (est.) + 40% × 59.5 = 63
Quatrac Pro+: 60% × 80.2 + 40% × 81.1 = 81
No road tests of wet for KL33. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
-
–
Snow
No comparison66Why this score
Source KL33 Quatrac Pro+ Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 13 tests – 64 Reviews found online – 69 Quatrac Pro+: 60% × 64.4 + 40% × 68.5 = 66
-
61
Comfort
Quatrac Pro+ +869Why this score
Source KL33 Quatrac Pro+ Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 4 tests ≈ 66 (est.) 66 Reviews found online 57 71 KL33: 40% × 66.3 (est.) + 60% × 56.9 = 61
Quatrac Pro+: 40% × 66.1 + 60% × 71.3 = 69
No road tests of comfort for KL33. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).
-
–
Noise
No comparison76Why this score
Source KL33 Quatrac Pro+ Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 10 tests – 82 Reviews found online – ≈ 66 (est.) Quatrac Pro+: 60% × 81.8 + 40% × 66.3 (est.) = 76
No owner ratings of noise for Quatrac Pro+. The owner half is the owners’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests, so the tests say nothing about how owners would rate it.
-
52
Treadwear
Quatrac Pro+ +1264Why this score
Source KL33 Quatrac Pro+ Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests ≈ 58 (est.) 65 Reviews found online 44 63 KL33: 60% × 58.3 (est.) + 40% × 43.5 = 52
Quatrac Pro+: 60% × 64.9 + 40% × 63.2 = 64
No road tests of treadwear for KL33. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
-
57
Handling (owners)
Quatrac Pro+ +1976Why this score
Source KL33 Quatrac Pro+ Reviews found online 57 76 -
–
Efficiency
No comparison53Why this score
Source KL33 Quatrac Pro+ Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 10 tests – 53
Scores at a glance
| Category | Kumho KL33 | Vredestein Quatrac Pro+ |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 59 | 72 |
| Dry | 60 | 67 |
| Wet | 63 | 81 |
| Snow | – | 66 |
| Comfort | 61 | 69 |
| Noise | – | 76 |
| Treadwear | 52 | 64 |
| Handling (owners) | 57 | 76 |
| Efficiency | – | 53 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Not important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Recomputed
Headline score
59
/ 100
KL33
72
/ 100
Quatrac Pro+
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A KL33
Pros
- Good value for money with competitive pricing
- Strong initial dry and wet grip/traction
- Comfortable and smooth ride quality
Cons
- Premature tread wear and short lifespan
- Serious structural concerns including tread chipping, chunking, and delamination
- Road noise increases significantly as the tire wears down
Tire B Quatrac Pro+
Pros
- Strong wet-weather grip and confidence, including in heavy rain, standing water and emergency braking
- Planted, precise handling and good dry grip and cornering, often described as sporty
- Low road noise and good ride comfort, with several reviewers noting they are as quiet as or quieter than previous tires (including Michelin and budget tires)
Cons
- Not a substitute for a dedicated winter tire; limited in deep fresh snow and criticized as hopeless in winter by one user who bought them by mistake
- Some wear and durability concerns, including faster wear when driven sportily, hardening over time, and isolated reports of premature damage
- Less steering feedback and a soft or squishy on-center feel for some drivers of sporty cars
What real owners are saying
From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score
Tire A
Kumho KL33
We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.
Tire B
Positive
Vredestein Quatrac Pro+
Community opinion is largely favorable, with owners praising the Quatrac Pro+ for strong wet grip, a quiet and comfortable ride, and good value. Its 3PMSF rating gives better snow capability than regular all-seasons, though many say it leans toward wet and sporty performance rather than deep snow. Critics and comparison posts note that it trails the best all-weather tires, such as the CrossClimate2, and UHP all-seasons, such as the DWS06+, in braking and handling. A few isolated complaints involve shoulder chunking, air loss and a slow leak.
r/wrx_vb
·2 upvotes ·2025-05-27
“I just put the Vrederstein Quatrac Pro+ on my 24 Mini Countryman S All4, replacing the Pirelli runflats that were good tires, but kinda loud and you could feel every imperfection in the road. I don't have a lot of miles on em yet, but they are definitely quieter and more comfortable. I've noticed that they do like to lose a little bit of air, don't know if it's the tires or the valve stems, or the installer didn't seal the bead on em good enough. Will monitor it and if it keeps up, I'll take em back and have em checked. So far I like them.”
r/LexusES
·1 upvote ·2026-10-22
“I had a different set of tires, but also with the slightest wet roads, slipping all over. This summer I went with Vredestein Quatrac Pro+, traction so far has been great for me in the wet and pretty quiet (61 decibels in the cabin at highway speed).”
r/TeslaModelY
·5 upvotes ·2026-10-05
“23 Model Y LR....just did my first tire change at 41k miles from stock Contis to Vredestein Quatrac Pro+. Better all the way around, no foam. There is not much of a road noise difference, maybe a bit louder going over concrete sections on some highways. I don't buy into the foam theory. Noise comes from tire composition and tread hitting varying surfaces. Every tire will give a different sound and sound level, foam or not.”
Top themes
#Wet grip#Quiet ride#Ride comfort#Snow capability 3PMSF#Value pricing#Tesla/EV use#vs CrossClimate2/DWS06+#PNW rain use
Based on 65 community posts
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Kumho KL33 | B · Vredestein Quatrac Pro+ |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer | All Season |
| Vehicle type | SUV and 4x4 | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | 18 | 103 |
| Rim diameters | 15″ – 20″ | 17″ – 22″ |
| Sizes in common | 14 | 14 |
Which one should you actually buy?
59
/ 100
Kumho KL33
72
/ 100
Vredestein Quatrac Pro+
Winner: Vredestein Quatrac Pro+ — better handling, wet and treadwear. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Pick tire B
You enjoy sharp, responsive handling
Vredestein Quatrac Pro+ scores 76 vs 57 on handling.
Pick tire B
Your priority is wet-weather safety
Vredestein Quatrac Pro+ scores 81 vs 63 on wet.
Pick tire B
You want the longest tread life
Vredestein Quatrac Pro+ scores 64 vs 52 on treadwear.
Pick tire B
You want the most comfortable ride
Vredestein Quatrac Pro+ scores 69 vs 61 on comfort.
Tire A · Kumho KL33
Tire B · Vredestein Quatrac Pro+
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
KL33 or Quatrac Pro+?
Which is better in the wet, KL33 or Quatrac Pro+?
Vredestein Quatrac Pro+, 81 vs 63 on our wet score.
Which grips better on dry roads, KL33 or Quatrac Pro+?
Vredestein Quatrac Pro+, 67 vs 60 on our dry score.
Which is more comfortable, KL33 or Quatrac Pro+?
Vredestein Quatrac Pro+, 69 vs 61 on our comfort score.
Which lasts longer, KL33 or Quatrac Pro+?
Vredestein Quatrac Pro+, 64 vs 52 on our treadwear score.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology