Head-to-head Updated

Kumho Solus HA31 vs Yokohama AVID TOURING-S — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): 60% professional tests, 40% owner reviews.

Solus HA31 is ahead, 71–66

Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Tire AKumho

Solus HA31

All Season

Tests 70 · 2 tests Owners 73 · 18 reviews

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 67

    Dry

    Solus HA31 +1
    66
    Why this score
    SourceSolus HA31AVID TOURING-S
    Professional tests (TWG score)64–
    Reviews found online7266
  2. 76

    Wet

    Solus HA31 +9
    67
    Why this score
    SourceSolus HA31AVID TOURING-S
    Professional tests (TWG score)75–
    Reviews found online7866
  3. 71

    Snow

    Solus HA31 +9
    62
    Why this score
    SourceSolus HA31AVID TOURING-S
    Professional tests (TWG score)66–
    Reviews found online7857
  4. 71

    Comfort

    Solus HA31 +3
    68
    Why this score
    SourceSolus HA31AVID TOURING-S
    Reviews found online7366
  5. 71

    Noise

    Solus HA31 +4
    67
    Why this score
    SourceSolus HA31AVID TOURING-S
    Professional tests (TWG score)72–
    Reviews found online7068
  6. 70

    Treadwear

    Solus HA31 +3
    67
    Why this score
    SourceSolus HA31AVID TOURING-S
    Professional tests (TWG score)71–
    Reviews found online6768
  7. 73

    Handling

    Solus HA31 +9
    64
    Why this score
    SourceSolus HA31AVID TOURING-S
    Reviews found online7364
Scores at a glance
Kumho Solus HA31 vs Yokohama AVID TOURING-S: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryKumho Solus HA31Yokohama AVID TOURING-S
Relative Score 71 66
Dry 67 66
Wet 76 67
Snow 71 62
Comfort 71 68
Noise 71 67
Treadwear 70 67
Handling 73 64

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Less important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Less important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score

Solus HA31

AVID TOURING-S

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Solus HA31

Pros

  • Excellent snow and winter weather traction
  • Strong grip and stability on wet and dry roads
  • High value and competitive pricing compared to premium brands

Cons

  • Higher than average road noise, particularly at highway speeds
  • Tires can feel slightly soft in warmer weather conditions
  • Mixed feedback regarding dry performance compared to dedicated summer options
All owner themes in the Solus HA31 review

Tire B AVID TOURING-S

Not enough owner reviews yet to extract themes.

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Kumho Solus HA31 B · Yokohama AVID TOURING-S
CategoryAll Season—
Vehicle typePassenger Car / Crossover—
Sizes available2928
Rim diameters13″ – 18″15″ – 17″
Tread depth10/32″11/32″
UTQG420 A A620 A B
Treadwear warranty—80,000 mi
SidewallBlackwallWhitewall
Max pressure50 psi—

Which one should you actually buy?

Kumho Solus HA31

Yokohama AVID TOURING-S

Winner: Kumho Solus HA31 — better wet, snow and handling. It leads or ties in every category we score.

Pick tire A Your priority is wet-weather safety

Kumho Solus HA31 scores 76 vs 67 on wet.

Pick tire A You drive through snowy winters

Kumho Solus HA31 scores 71 vs 62 on snow.

Pick tire A You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Kumho Solus HA31 scores 73 vs 64 on handling.

Pick tire A You want a quieter cabin

Kumho Solus HA31 scores 71 vs 67 on noise.

Tire A · Kumho Solus HA31
Tire B · Yokohama AVID TOURING-S

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.

71

Leads

Solus HA31

Amazon