Tests – · none yet Owners 58 · 56 reviews
Kumho Solus KH17 vs Nexen N Blue ECO — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews. Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 56 + 36 owner reviews. How we score
N Blue ECO leads, 66–62 Narrow edge
Add your size for an exact match
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests – · none yet Owners 64 · 36 reviews
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
60
Dry
N Blue ECO +666Why this score
Source Solus KH17 N Blue ECO Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 63 (est.) ≈ 67 (est.) Reviews found online 56 66 Solus KH17: 60% × 63 (est.) + 40% × 55.9 = 60
N Blue ECO: 60% × 66.9 (est.) + 40% × 65.6 = 66
No road tests of dry for Solus KH17. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).
No road tests of dry for N Blue ECO. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).
-
65
Wet
N Blue ECO +469Why this score
Source Solus KH17 N Blue ECO Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 66 (est.) ≈ 69 (est.) Reviews found online 63 69 Solus KH17: 60% × 65.8 (est.) + 40% × 62.6 = 65
N Blue ECO: 60% × 69.5 (est.) + 40% × 69.2 = 69
No road tests of wet for Solus KH17. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).
No road tests of wet for N Blue ECO. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).
-
63
Comfort
N Blue ECO +366Why this score
Source Solus KH17 N Blue ECO Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 67 (est.) ≈ 68 (est.) Reviews found online 58 63 Solus KH17: 60% × 67.2 (est.) + 40% × 57.7 = 63
N Blue ECO: 60% × 68.1 (est.) + 40% × 62.9 = 66
No road tests of comfort for Solus KH17 or N Blue ECO. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
59
Treadwear
N Blue ECO +160Why this score
Source Solus KH17 N Blue ECO Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 62 (est.) ≈ 63 (est.) Reviews found online 55 56 Solus KH17: 60% × 62.4 (est.) + 40% × 55.1 = 59
N Blue ECO: 60% × 62.8 (est.) + 40% × 56.4 = 60
No road tests of treadwear for Solus KH17. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).
No road tests of treadwear for N Blue ECO. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).
-
58
Handling (owners)
N Blue ECO +866Why this score
Source Solus KH17 N Blue ECO Reviews found online 58 66
Scores at a glance
| Category | Kumho Solus KH17 | Nexen N Blue ECO |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 62 | 66 |
| Dry | 60 | 66 |
| Wet | 65 | 69 |
| Comfort | 63 | 66 |
| Treadwear | 59 | 60 |
| Handling (owners) | 58 | 66 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Solus KH17
N Blue ECO
The professional test results behind the scores
Per discipline: the average % of the best tire over every test both tires were in, and how many of those tests each one won. “Different tests” rows compare results from separate tests.
| Discipline | Category | Solus KH17 | N Blue ECO | Δ | Head-to-head |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Also published by the testers (not in the score) | |||||
| Overall Ranking | Overall | #14/54 2013 54 Tyre Braking Test | #15/16 2013 ACE Summer Touring Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A Solus KH17
Pros
- Excellent value for money compared to premium brands
- Strong dry weather traction and road feedback
- Generally quiet and comfortable ride quality
Cons
- Inconsistent tread life with reports of premature wear
- Mixed performance in wet conditions
- Susceptibility to sidewall bubbles and structural issues
Tire B N Blue ECO
Pros
- Excellent value for money and budget-friendly purchase price
- Strong grip and handling in both wet and dry conditions
- Good ride comfort and relatively low road noise
Cons
- Rapid or uneven tread wear reported by several users
- Premature rubber cracking and perishing observed over time
- Polarizing opinions on wet weather traction and braking distance
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Kumho Solus KH17 | B · Nexen N Blue ECO |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer | Summer |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | 11 | 24 |
| Rim diameters | 13″ – 18″ | 13″ – 16″ |
| Sizes in common | 2 | 2 |
Which one should you actually buy?
Kumho Solus KH17
Nexen N Blue ECO
Narrow edge: Nexen N Blue ECO — better handling, dry and wet. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Nexen N Blue ECO scores 66 vs 58 on handling.
Nexen N Blue ECO scores 66 vs 60 on dry.
Nexen N Blue ECO scores 69 vs 65 on wet.
Nexen N Blue ECO scores 66 vs 63 on comfort.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Solus KH17 or N Blue ECO?
Which is better in the wet, Solus KH17 or N Blue ECO?
Nexen N Blue ECO, 69 vs 65 on our wet score.
Which grips better on dry roads, Solus KH17 or N Blue ECO?
Nexen N Blue ECO, 66 vs 60 on our dry score.
Which is more comfortable, Solus KH17 or N Blue ECO?
Nexen N Blue ECO, 66 vs 63 on our comfort score.
Which lasts longer, Solus KH17 or N Blue ECO?
Neither, by our numbers: 59 vs 60 on the treadwear score, within 3 points.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology