Head-to-head Updated

Kumho Solus TA11 vs Nexen N Blue ECO — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews. Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 59 + 36 owner reviews. How we score

Too close to call: Solus TA11 and N Blue ECO are level at 66.

Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Kumho Solus TA11
Tire AKumho

Solus TA11

Premium Touring All Season tire

Tests – · none yet Owners 63 · 59 reviews

Nexen N Blue ECO
Tire BNexen

N Blue ECO

Summer

Tests – · none yet Owners 64 · 36 reviews

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 64

    Dry

    N Blue ECO +2
    66
    Why this score
    SourceSolus TA11N Blue ECO
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 65 (est.)≈ 67 (est.)
    Reviews found online6266

    Solus TA11: 60% × 65.3 (est.) + 40% × 61.7 = 64

    N Blue ECO: 60% × 66.9 (est.) + 40% × 65.6 = 66

    No road tests of dry for Solus TA11. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).

    No road tests of dry for N Blue ECO. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).

  2. 68

    Wet

    N Blue ECO +1
    69
    Why this score
    SourceSolus TA11N Blue ECO
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 68 (est.)≈ 69 (est.)
    Reviews found online6769

    Solus TA11: 60% × 68.4 (est.) + 40% × 67.3 = 68

    N Blue ECO: 60% × 69.5 (est.) + 40% × 69.2 = 69

    No road tests of wet for Solus TA11. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).

    No road tests of wet for N Blue ECO. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).

  3. 59

    Snow

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourceSolus TA11N Blue ECO
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 64 (est.)–
    Reviews found online52–

    Solus TA11: 60% × 64 (est.) + 40% × 52.1 = 59

    No road tests of snow for Solus TA11. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.33).

  4. 66

    Comfort

    Level
    66
    Why this score
    SourceSolus TA11N Blue ECO
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 68 (est.)≈ 68 (est.)
    Reviews found online6363

    Solus TA11: 60% × 68.1 (est.) + 40% × 63.2 = 66

    N Blue ECO: 60% × 68.1 (est.) + 40% × 62.9 = 66

    No road tests of comfort for Solus TA11 or N Blue ECO. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.

  5. 67

    Noise

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourceSolus TA11N Blue ECO
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 67 (est.)–
    Reviews found online68–

    Solus TA11: 60% × 67.3 (est.) + 40% × 67.5 = 67

    No road tests of noise for Solus TA11. The test half is the tested tires’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.

  6. 65

    Treadwear

    Solus TA11 +5
    60
    Why this score
    SourceSolus TA11N Blue ECO
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 65 (est.)≈ 63 (est.)
    Reviews found online6556

    Solus TA11: 60% × 65.5 (est.) + 40% × 65.2 = 65

    N Blue ECO: 60% × 62.8 (est.) + 40% × 56.4 = 60

    No road tests of treadwear for Solus TA11. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).

    No road tests of treadwear for N Blue ECO. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).

  7. 63

    Handling (owners)

    N Blue ECO +3
    66
    Why this score
    SourceSolus TA11N Blue ECO
    Reviews found online6366
Scores at a glance
Kumho Solus TA11 vs Nexen N Blue ECO: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryKumho Solus TA11Nexen N Blue ECO
Relative Score 66 66
Dry 64 66
Wet 68 69
Snow 59 –
Comfort 66 66
Noise 67 –
Treadwear 65 60
Handling (owners) 63 66

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score

Solus TA11

N Blue ECO

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Solus TA11

Pros

  • Exceptional value and budget-friendly pricing
  • Quiet and comfortable highway ride
  • Reliable traction in dry and wet conditions

Cons

  • Lack of rigidity or grip for aggressive driving
  • Subpar performance in deep snow or severe winter conditions
  • Occasional reports of road noise depending on the vehicle or surface
All owner themes in the Solus TA11 review

Tire B N Blue ECO

Pros

  • Excellent value for money and budget-friendly purchase price
  • Strong grip and handling in both wet and dry conditions
  • Good ride comfort and relatively low road noise

Cons

  • Rapid or uneven tread wear reported by several users
  • Premature rubber cracking and perishing observed over time
  • Polarizing opinions on wet weather traction and braking distance
All owner themes in the N Blue ECO review

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Kumho Solus TA11 B · Nexen N Blue ECO
CategoryPremium Touring All Season tireSummer
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover
Sizes available1824
Rim diameters13″ – 18″13″ – 16″
Tread depth10/32″—
UTQG700 A B—
Treadwear warranty75,000 mi—
SidewallBlackwall—
Max pressure44 psi—
Sizes in common77

Which one should you actually buy?

Kumho Solus TA11

Nexen N Blue ECO

Too close to call: Kumho Solus TA11 and Nexen N Blue ECO are within 2 points overall. Kumho Solus TA11 is stronger on treadwear.

Pick tire A You want the longest tread life

Kumho Solus TA11 scores 65 vs 60 on treadwear.

Tire A · Kumho Solus TA11
Tire B · Nexen N Blue ECO

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Solus TA11 or N Blue ECO?

Which is better in the wet, Solus TA11 or N Blue ECO?

Neither, by our numbers: 68 vs 69 on the wet score, within 3 points.

Which grips better on dry roads, Solus TA11 or N Blue ECO?

Neither, by our numbers: 64 vs 66 on the dry score, within 3 points.

Which is more comfortable, Solus TA11 or N Blue ECO?

Neither, by our numbers: 66 vs 66 on the comfort score, within 3 points.

Which lasts longer, Solus TA11 or N Blue ECO?

Kumho Solus TA11, 65 vs 60 on our treadwear score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology