tirewheelguide
Head-to-head Updated

Kumho Solus TA11 vs Yokohama AVID TOURING-S — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 59 + 85 owner reviews. How we score

Too close to call: Solus TA11 66, AVID TOURING-S 67.

Check price on Amazon · Solus TA11 Check price on Amazon · AVID TOURING-S
Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Kumho Solus TA11
Tire AKumho

Solus TA11

Premium Touring All Season tire

± 7

Tests – · none yet Owners 65 · 59 reviews

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 65

    Dry

    AVID TOURING-S +2
    67
    Why this score
    SourceSolus TA11AVID TOURING-S
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 66 (est.)≈ 67 (est.)
    Reviews found online6366

    Solus TA11: 60% × 66.1 (est.) + 40% × 63.4 = 65

    AVID TOURING-S: 60% × 67.3 (est.) + 40% × 66.3 = 67

    No road tests of dry for Solus TA11. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).

    No road tests of dry for AVID TOURING-S. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).

  2. 70

    Wet

    Solus TA11 +2
    68
    Why this score
    SourceSolus TA11AVID TOURING-S
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 70 (est.)≈ 68 (est.)
    Reviews found online7067

    Solus TA11: 60% × 70.2 (est.) + 40% × 69.7 = 70

    AVID TOURING-S: 60% × 68.4 (est.) + 40% × 66.5 = 68

    No road tests of wet for Solus TA11. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

    No road tests of wet for AVID TOURING-S. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

  3. 60

    Snow

    AVID TOURING-S +3
    63
    Why this score
    SourceSolus TA11AVID TOURING-S
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 65 (est.)≈ 67 (est.)
    Reviews found online5258

    Solus TA11: 60% × 64.7 (est.) + 40% × 52.1 = 60

    AVID TOURING-S: 60% × 66.5 (est.) + 40% × 57.9 = 63

    No road tests of snow for Solus TA11. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).

    No road tests of snow for AVID TOURING-S. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).

  4. 66

    Comfort

    Level
    66
    Why this score
    SourceSolus TA11AVID TOURING-S
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 68 (est.)≈ 68 (est.)
    Reviews found online6465

    Solus TA11: 40% × 67.8 (est.) + 60% × 64.3 = 66

    AVID TOURING-S: 40% × 68.1 (est.) + 60% × 65.4 = 66

    No road tests of comfort for Solus TA11. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).

    No road tests of comfort for AVID TOURING-S. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).

  5. 67

    Noise

    Level
    67
    Why this score
    SourceSolus TA11AVID TOURING-S
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 66 (est.)≈ 66 (est.)
    Reviews found online6968

    Solus TA11: 60% × 66.3 (est.) + 40% × 69.1 = 67

    AVID TOURING-S: 60% × 66.3 (est.) + 40% × 68.2 = 67

    No road tests of noise for Solus TA11 or AVID TOURING-S. The test half is the tested tires’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.

  6. 67

    Treadwear

    AVID TOURING-S +2
    69
    Why this score
    SourceSolus TA11AVID TOURING-S
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 67 (est.)≈ 68 (est.)
    Reviews found online6870

    Solus TA11: 60% × 66.9 (est.) + 40% × 67.6 = 67

    AVID TOURING-S: 60% × 67.8 (est.) + 40% × 70.1 = 69

    No road tests of treadwear for Solus TA11. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).

    No road tests of treadwear for AVID TOURING-S. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).

Scores at a glance
CategoryKumho Solus TA11Yokohama AVID TOURING-S
Relative Score 66 67
Dry 65 67
Wet 70 68
Snow 60 63
Comfort 66 66
Noise 67 67
Treadwear 67 69

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score
± 7

Solus TA11

± 7

AVID TOURING-S

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Solus TA11

Pros

  • Exceptional value and budget-friendly pricing
  • Quiet and comfortable highway ride
  • Reliable traction in dry and wet conditions

Cons

  • Lack of rigidity or grip for aggressive driving
  • Subpar performance in deep snow or severe winter conditions
  • Occasional reports of road noise depending on the vehicle or surface
All owner themes in the Solus TA11 review

Tire B AVID TOURING-S

Pros

  • Good value: many reviewers cite a low price relative to quality and describe it as a credible, cheaper alternative to Michelin and other name brands.
  • Quiet, smooth, and comfortable ride, mentioned very frequently, including by reviewers who expected a loud tire.
  • Long tread life: reports include about 65,000 miles on a Subaru Outback, about 80,000 miles per set over three sets, and minimal wear after 5,000 to 10,000 miles.

Cons

  • Some reviewers report wheelspin or weak traction when starting from a stop in wet or snowy conditions.
  • Noise is mentioned by several reviewers, including tread growl, a louder tire than their previous set, and a tire described as 'so noisy'.
  • Soft sidewall or tire feel: one reviewer described vague steering and flexing, another called the tire 'soft' and noted tracking in pavement grooves on some highways.
All owner themes in the AVID TOURING-S review

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Kumho Solus TA11 B · Yokohama AVID TOURING-S
CategoryPremium Touring All Season tireAll Season
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover
Sizes available1828
Rim diameters13″ – 18″15″ – 17″
Tread depth10/32″11/32″
UTQG700 A B620 A B
Treadwear warranty75,000 mi80,000 mi
SidewallBlackwallWhitewall
Max pressure44 psi—
Sizes in common1515

Which one should you actually buy?

Kumho Solus TA11

Yokohama AVID TOURING-S

Too close to call: Kumho Solus TA11 and Yokohama AVID TOURING-S are within 2 points overall. Yokohama AVID TOURING-S is stronger on snow.

Pick tire B You drive through snowy winters

Yokohama AVID TOURING-S scores 63 vs 60 on snow.

Tire A · Kumho Solus TA11
Check price on Amazon
Tire B · Yokohama AVID TOURING-S
Check price on Amazon

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Solus TA11 or AVID TOURING-S?

Which is better in the wet, Solus TA11 or AVID TOURING-S?

Neither, by our numbers: 70 vs 68 on the wet score, within 3 points.

Which grips better on dry roads, Solus TA11 or AVID TOURING-S?

Neither, by our numbers: 65 vs 67 on the dry score, within 3 points.

Which is better in snow, Solus TA11 or AVID TOURING-S?

Yokohama AVID TOURING-S, 63 vs 60 on our snow score.

Which is quieter, Solus TA11 or AVID TOURING-S?

Neither, by our numbers: 67 vs 67 on the noise score, within 3 points.

Which is more comfortable, Solus TA11 or AVID TOURING-S?

Neither, by our numbers: 66 vs 66 on the comfort score, within 3 points.

Which lasts longer, Solus TA11 or AVID TOURING-S?

Neither, by our numbers: 67 vs 69 on the treadwear score, within 3 points.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology