Head-to-head Updated

Kumho WinterCraft WP72 vs Riken Snow — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 4 road tests and 28 + 9 owner reviews. How we score

WinterCraft WP72 leads, 70–68 Narrow edge

Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Riken Snow
Tire BRiken

Snow

Winter

± 7

Tests 64 · 4 tests Owners 68 · 9 reviews

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 65

    Dry

    Snow +1
    66
    Why this score
    SourceWinterCraft WP72Snow
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 66 (est.)≈ 67 (est.)
    Reviews found online6365

    WinterCraft WP72: 60% × 66 (est.) + 40% × 63.3 = 65

    Snow: 60% × 66.9 (est.) + 40% × 65.4 = 66

    No road tests of dry for WinterCraft WP72. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).

    No road tests of dry for Snow. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).

  2. 74

    Wet

    WinterCraft WP72 +7
    67
    Why this score
    SourceWinterCraft WP72Snow
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 4 tests≈ 73 (est.)64
    Reviews found online7671

    WinterCraft WP72: 60% × 73.3 (est.) + 40% × 75.5 = 74

    Snow: 60% × 64.4 + 40% × 70.6 = 67

    No road tests of wet for WinterCraft WP72. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

  3. 73

    Snow

    WinterCraft WP72 +2
    71
    Why this score
    SourceWinterCraft WP72Snow
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 72 (est.)≈ 71 (est.)
    Reviews found online7671

    WinterCraft WP72: 60% × 72.1 (est.) + 40% × 75.5 = 73

    Snow: 60% × 70.5 (est.) + 40% × 70.5 = 71

    No road tests of snow for WinterCraft WP72. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).

    No road tests of snow for Snow. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).

  4. 66

    Comfort

    WinterCraft WP72 +2
    64
    Why this score
    SourceWinterCraft WP72Snow
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 68 (est.)≈ 67 (est.)
    Reviews found online6563

    WinterCraft WP72: 40% × 67.9 (est.) + 60% × 65 = 66

    Snow: 40% × 67.4 (est.) + 60% × 62.5 = 64

    No road tests of comfort for WinterCraft WP72. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).

    No road tests of comfort for Snow. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).

  5. 66

    Noise

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourceWinterCraft WP72Snow
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 66 (est.)–
    Reviews found online64–

    WinterCraft WP72: 60% × 66.4 (est.) + 40% × 64.4 = 66

    No road tests of noise for WinterCraft WP72. The test half is the tested tires’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.

  6. 70

    Treadwear

    WinterCraft WP72 +2
    68
    Why this score
    SourceWinterCraft WP72Snow
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 69 (est.)≈ 67 (est.)
    Reviews found online7369

    WinterCraft WP72: 60% × 68.8 (est.) + 40% × 72.7 = 70

    Snow: 60% × 67.3 (est.) + 40% × 68.7 = 68

    No road tests of treadwear for WinterCraft WP72. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).

    No road tests of treadwear for Snow. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).

  7. 66

    Handling (owners)

    Level
    66
    Why this score
    SourceWinterCraft WP72Snow
    Reviews found online6666
Scores at a glance
Kumho WinterCraft WP72 vs Riken Snow: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryKumho WinterCraft WP72Riken Snow
Relative Score 70 68
Dry 65 66
Wet 74 67
Snow 73 71
Comfort 66 64
Noise 66 –
Treadwear 70 68
Handling (owners) 66 66

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score
± 7

WinterCraft WP72

± 7

Snow

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

The professional test results behind the scores

Per discipline: the average % of the best tire over every test both tires were in, and how many of those tests each one won. “Different tests” rows compare results from separate tests.

DisciplineCategoryWinterCraft WP72SnowΔHead-to-head
Also published by the testers (not in the score)
Overall Ranking Overall #2/2 2025 AutoView Winter Tire Test R19 #36/55 2024 Winter 55 Tyre Braking Test – Different tests

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A WinterCraft WP72

Pros

  • Exceptional grip and traction in snow, slush, and deep snow conditions
  • Great value and budget-friendly pricing compared to tier-one premium brands
  • Surprisingly low noise levels and high comfort for a winter tire

Cons

  • Some users reported vague high-speed handling or a 'jelly' sidewall feel at speeds over 50-60 mph
  • A few mentions of increased noise compared to standard all-season tires
  • Potential for flat-spotting due to nylon cord construction, making balancing difficult for some
All owner themes in the WinterCraft WP72 review

Tire B Snow

Pros

  • Exceptional snow, ice, and winter traction
  • High value for the money in the budget tire category
  • Low road noise compared to standard winter tires

Cons

  • Reduced wet-weather braking performance during spirited driving
  • Lower-tier classification compared to premium flagship winter tires
All owner themes in the Snow review

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Kumho WinterCraft WP72 B · Riken Snow
CategoryWinterWinter
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover
Sizes available2541
Rim diameters18″ – 21″15″ – 18″
Tread depth11/32″—
SidewallBlackwall—
Max pressure51 psi—
Sizes in common00

Which one should you actually buy?

Kumho WinterCraft WP72

Riken Snow

Narrow edge: Kumho WinterCraft WP72 — better wet. Where the Riken Snow is ahead, it is by less than 3 points.

Pick tire A Your priority is wet-weather safety

Kumho WinterCraft WP72 scores 74 vs 67 on wet.

Tire A · Kumho WinterCraft WP72
Tire B · Riken Snow

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

WinterCraft WP72 or Snow?

Which is better in the wet, WinterCraft WP72 or Snow?

Kumho WinterCraft WP72, 74 vs 67 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, WinterCraft WP72 or Snow?

Neither, by our numbers: 65 vs 66 on the dry score, within 3 points.

Which is better in snow, WinterCraft WP72 or Snow?

Neither, by our numbers: 73 vs 71 on the snow score, within 3 points.

Which is more comfortable, WinterCraft WP72 or Snow?

Neither, by our numbers: 66 vs 64 on the comfort score, within 3 points.

Which lasts longer, WinterCraft WP72 or Snow?

Neither, by our numbers: 70 vs 68 on the treadwear score, within 3 points.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology