Head-to-head Updated

Laufenn G Fit 4S vs Laufenn S FIT AS — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 6 + 1 road tests and 9 + 16 owner reviews. How we score

G Fit 4S is ahead, 77–60

Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Laufenn G Fit 4S
Tire ALaufenn

G Fit 4S

All Season

± 5

Tests 71 · 6 tests Owners 81 · 9 reviews

Best test result: #1 of 15 in 2025 AutoBild All Season Tyre Test (wet circle)

Laufenn S FIT AS
Tire BLaufenn

S FIT AS

All Season

± 7Provisional

Tests – · 1 test Owners 53 · 16 reviews

Best test result: #4 of 19 in 2022 Consumer Reports Ultra High Performance All-Season Tires (tested tread life (miles))

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 72

    Dry

    G Fit 4S +12
    60
    Why this score
    SourceG Fit 4SS FIT AS
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 6 / – tests65≈ 63 (est.)
    Reviews found online8156

    G Fit 4S: 60% × 65.3 + 40% × 81.3 = 72

    S FIT AS: 60% × 62.9 (est.) + 40% × 55.6 = 60

    No road tests of dry for S FIT AS. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).

  2. 85

    Wet

    G Fit 4S +26
    59
    Why this score
    SourceG Fit 4SS FIT AS
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 6 / – tests86≈ 62 (est.)
    Reviews found online8554

    G Fit 4S: 60% × 85.7 + 40% × 84.8 = 85

    S FIT AS: 60% × 61.6 (est.) + 40% × 53.9 = 59

    No road tests of wet for S FIT AS. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.54).

  3. 77

    Snow

    G Fit 4S +27
    50
    Why this score
    SourceG Fit 4SS FIT AS
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 2 / – tests77≈ 59 (est.)
    Reviews found online7736

    G Fit 4S: 60% × 76.7 + 40% × 76.8 = 77

    S FIT AS: 60% × 59.5 (est.) + 40% × 36.4 = 50

    No road tests of snow for S FIT AS. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).

  4. 76

    Comfort

    G Fit 4S +14
    62
    Why this score
    SourceG Fit 4SS FIT AS
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / – tests72≈ 67 (est.)
    Reviews found online7958

    G Fit 4S: 40% × 71.7 + 60% × 78.5 = 76

    S FIT AS: 40% × 67.2 (est.) + 60% × 58.4 = 62

    No road tests of comfort for S FIT AS. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.

  5. 38

    Noise

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourceG Fit 4SS FIT AS
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 2 / – tests19–
    Reviews found online≈ 67 (est.)–

    G Fit 4S: 60% × 18.5 + 40% × 66.5 (est.) = 38

    No owner ratings of noise for G Fit 4S. The owner half is the owners’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests, so the tests say nothing about how owners would rate it.

  6. 75

    Treadwear

    G Fit 4S +7
    68
    Why this score
    SourceG Fit 4SS FIT AS
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / 1 tests7275
    Reviews found online7957

    G Fit 4S: 60% × 72.4 + 40% × 78.6 = 75

    S FIT AS: 60% × 74.9 + 40% × 56.7 = 68

  7. 80

    Handling (owners)

    G Fit 4S +24
    56
    Why this score
    SourceG Fit 4SS FIT AS
    Reviews found online8056
  8. 47

    Efficiency

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourceG Fit 4SS FIT AS
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 2 / – tests47–
Scores at a glance
Laufenn G Fit 4S vs Laufenn S FIT AS: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryLaufenn G Fit 4SLaufenn S FIT AS
Relative Score 77 60
Dry 72 60
Wet 85 59
Snow 77 50
Comfort 76 62
Noise 38 –
Treadwear 75 68
Handling (owners) 80 56
Efficiency 47 –

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Not important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Recomputed
Headline score
± 5

G Fit 4S

± 7

S FIT AS

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

The professional test results behind the scores

Per discipline: the average % of the best tire over every test both tires were in, and how many of those tests each one won. “Different tests” rows compare results from separate tests.

DisciplineCategoryG Fit 4SS FIT ASΔHead-to-head
Also published by the testers (not in the score)
Overall Ranking Overall #8/12 2026 Auto Bild Allrad SUV All Season Tyre Test #15/19 2022 Consumer Reports Ultra High Performance All-Season Tires – Different tests

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A G Fit 4S

Pros

  • Excellent grip and performance in wet conditions and heavy snow
  • High value for money as an affordable budget tire with Hankook backing
  • Quiet and comfortable ride quality

Cons

  • Slightly noticeable tread noise at higher speeds above 100 km/h
  • Isolated quality control concerns regarding sidewall bumps on new tires
All owner themes in the G Fit 4S review

Tire B S FIT AS

Pros

  • Exceptional value for the price compared to ultra-budget alternatives
  • Very quiet and comfortable ride quality
  • Good grip and handling in dry conditions

Cons

  • Subpar wet-weather grip, with tendencies to lose traction easily under acceleration
  • Wet performance degrades noticeably after 50% wear
  • Concerns regarding rapid tread wear or limited lifespan
All owner themes in the S FIT AS review

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Laufenn G Fit 4S B · Laufenn S FIT AS
CategoryAll SeasonAll Season
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover
Sizes available79—
Rim diameters13″ – 20″—

Which one should you actually buy?

Laufenn G Fit 4S

Laufenn S FIT AS

Winner: Laufenn G Fit 4S — better snow, wet and handling. It leads or ties in every category we score. Laufenn S FIT AS rests on little evidence so far (1 test, 16 reviews), so read this result as provisional.

Pick tire A You drive through snowy winters

Laufenn G Fit 4S scores 77 vs 50 on snow.

Pick tire A Your priority is wet-weather safety

Laufenn G Fit 4S scores 85 vs 59 on wet.

Pick tire A You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Laufenn G Fit 4S scores 80 vs 56 on handling.

Pick tire A You want the most comfortable ride

Laufenn G Fit 4S scores 76 vs 62 on comfort.

Tire A · Laufenn G Fit 4S
Tire B · Laufenn S FIT AS

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

G Fit 4S or S FIT AS?

Which is better in the wet, G Fit 4S or S FIT AS?

Laufenn G Fit 4S, 85 vs 59 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, G Fit 4S or S FIT AS?

Laufenn G Fit 4S, 72 vs 60 on our dry score.

Which is better in snow, G Fit 4S or S FIT AS?

Laufenn G Fit 4S, 77 vs 50 on our snow score.

Which is more comfortable, G Fit 4S or S FIT AS?

Laufenn G Fit 4S, 76 vs 62 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, G Fit 4S or S FIT AS?

Laufenn G Fit 4S, 75 vs 68 on our treadwear score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology