Tests 49 · 1 test Owners 46 · 7 reviews
Laufenn I FIT vs Riken Snow — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): 60% professional tests, 40% owner reviews.
Snow is ahead, 68–52
Add your size for an exact match
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
50
Dry
Snow +1565Why this score
Source I FIT Snow Reviews found online 40 64 -
42
Wet
Snow +2870Why this score
Source I FIT Snow Professional tests (TWG score) 49 – Reviews found online 33 69 -
64
Snow
Snow +771Why this score
Source I FIT Snow Reviews found online 60 72 -
62
Comfort
Snow +668Why this score
Source I FIT Snow Reviews found online 55 67 -
58
Treadwear
Snow +1169Why this score
Source I FIT Snow Reviews found online 53 71 -
38
Handling
Snow +2866Why this score
Source I FIT Snow Reviews found online 38 66
Scores at a glance
| Category | Laufenn I FIT | Riken Snow |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 52 | 68 |
| Dry | 50 | 65 |
| Wet | 42 | 70 |
| Snow | 64 | 71 |
| Comfort | 62 | 68 |
| Treadwear | 58 | 69 |
| Handling | 38 | 66 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
I FIT
Snow
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A I FIT
Pros
- Acceptable traction in snow and ice conditions
- Comfortable and quiet ride quality when new
- Affordable budget-oriented pricing as a Hankook sub-brand
Cons
- Catastrophically poor grip and high risk of aquaplaning on wet and cold roads
- Sudden loss of traction without warning, inspiring low confidence
- Rapid performance degradation after the first or second season
Tire B Snow
Pros
- Exceptional grip and reliability in deep snow, ice, and mud
- Outstanding value for the price point compared to premium competitors
- Surprisingly good dry road handling and cornering performance
Cons
- ABS can trigger more frequently during hard braking on wet roads
- Lower-class tire categorization compared to top-tier premium brands
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Laufenn I FIT | B · Riken Snow |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Winter | Winter |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | 4 | 41 |
| Rim diameters | 14″ – 18″ | 15″ – 18″ |
Which one should you actually buy?
Laufenn I FIT
Riken Snow
Winner: Riken Snow — better wet, handling and dry. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Riken Snow scores 70 vs 42 on wet.
Riken Snow scores 66 vs 38 on handling.
Riken Snow scores 65 vs 50 on dry.
Riken Snow scores 69 vs 58 on treadwear.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.