Head-to-head Updated

Laufenn I FIT vs Riken Snow — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): 60% professional tests, 40% owner reviews.

Snow is ahead, 68–52

Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Tire ALaufenn

I FIT

Winter

Tests 49 · 1 test Owners 46 · 7 reviews

Tire BRiken

Snow

Winter

Tests – · none yet Owners 69 · 8 reviews

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 50

    Dry

    Snow +15
    65
    Why this score
    SourceI FITSnow
    Reviews found online4064
  2. 42

    Wet

    Snow +28
    70
    Why this score
    SourceI FITSnow
    Professional tests (TWG score)49–
    Reviews found online3369
  3. 64

    Snow

    Snow +7
    71
    Why this score
    SourceI FITSnow
    Reviews found online6072
  4. 62

    Comfort

    Snow +6
    68
    Why this score
    SourceI FITSnow
    Reviews found online5567
  5. 58

    Treadwear

    Snow +11
    69
    Why this score
    SourceI FITSnow
    Reviews found online5371
  6. 38

    Handling

    Snow +28
    66
    Why this score
    SourceI FITSnow
    Reviews found online3866
Scores at a glance
Laufenn I FIT vs Riken Snow: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryLaufenn I FITRiken Snow
Relative Score 52 68
Dry 50 65
Wet 42 70
Snow 64 71
Comfort 62 68
Treadwear 58 69
Handling 38 66

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Less important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score

I FIT

Snow

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A I FIT

Pros

  • Acceptable traction in snow and ice conditions
  • Comfortable and quiet ride quality when new
  • Affordable budget-oriented pricing as a Hankook sub-brand

Cons

  • Catastrophically poor grip and high risk of aquaplaning on wet and cold roads
  • Sudden loss of traction without warning, inspiring low confidence
  • Rapid performance degradation after the first or second season
All owner themes in the I FIT review

Tire B Snow

Pros

  • Exceptional grip and reliability in deep snow, ice, and mud
  • Outstanding value for the price point compared to premium competitors
  • Surprisingly good dry road handling and cornering performance

Cons

  • ABS can trigger more frequently during hard braking on wet roads
  • Lower-class tire categorization compared to top-tier premium brands
All owner themes in the Snow review

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Laufenn I FIT B · Riken Snow
CategoryWinterWinter
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover
Sizes available441
Rim diameters14″ – 18″15″ – 18″

Which one should you actually buy?

Laufenn I FIT

Riken Snow

Winner: Riken Snow — better wet, handling and dry. It leads or ties in every category we score.

Pick tire B Your priority is wet-weather safety

Riken Snow scores 70 vs 42 on wet.

Pick tire B You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Riken Snow scores 66 vs 38 on handling.

Pick tire B You want the most grip on dry roads

Riken Snow scores 65 vs 50 on dry.

Pick tire B You want the longest tread life

Riken Snow scores 69 vs 58 on treadwear.

Tire A · Laufenn I FIT
Tire B · Riken Snow

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.

68

Leads

Snow

Amazon