Tests 50 · 1 test Owners 44 · 7 reviews
Head-to-head
Updated
Laufenn I FIT vs Toyo Snowprox S954 — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 1 + 7 road tests and 7 + 5 owner reviews. How we score
Snowprox S954 is ahead, 63–51
Add your size for an exact match
/R
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests 62 · 7 tests Owners 64 · 5 reviews
Best test result: #1 of 14 in 2020 Auto Zeitung Winter Tyre Test (dry handling (tester's mark))
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
50
Dry
Snowprox S954 +2272Why this score
Source I FIT Snowprox S954 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 5 tests ≈ 56 (est.) 78 Reviews found online 40 64 I FIT: 60% × 56.4 (est.) + 40% × 39.9 = 50
Snowprox S954: 60% × 77.8 + 40% × 63.5 = 72
No road tests of dry for I FIT. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).
-
43
Wet
Snowprox S954 +2568Why this score
Source I FIT Snowprox S954 Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / 7 tests 50 72 Reviews found online 34 63 Wet Braking (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 0–1 74% 86% I FIT: 60% × 49.8 + 40% × 33.7 = 43
Snowprox S954: 60% × 71.7 + 40% × 62.7 = 68
-
63
Snow
I FIT +1548Why this score
Source I FIT Snowprox S954 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 7 tests ≈ 66 (est.) 35 Reviews found online 58 67 I FIT: 60% × 66.4 (est.) + 40% × 57.5 = 63
Snowprox S954: 60% × 35.4 + 40% × 66.7 = 48
No road tests of snow for I FIT. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).
-
55
Comfort
Snowprox S954 +762Why this score
Source I FIT Snowprox S954 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 2 tests ≈ 65 (est.) 58 Reviews found online 48 65 I FIT: 40% × 64.5 (est.) + 60% × 48.2 = 55
Snowprox S954: 40% × 57.6 + 60% × 65.2 = 62
No road tests of comfort for I FIT. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).
-
–
Noise
No comparison69Why this score
Source I FIT Snowprox S954 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 2 tests – 70 Reviews found online – ≈ 66 (est.) Snowprox S954: 60% × 70.1 + 40% × 66.4 (est.) = 69
No owner ratings of noise for Snowprox S954. The owner half is the owners’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests, so the tests say nothing about how owners would rate it.
-
54
Treadwear
Snowprox S954 +963Why this score
Source I FIT Snowprox S954 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 59 (est.) ≈ 65 (est.) Reviews found online 46 62 I FIT: 60% × 59 (est.) + 40% × 45.8 = 54
Snowprox S954: 60% × 64.7 (est.) + 40% × 61.5 = 63
No road tests of treadwear for I FIT. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
No road tests of treadwear for Snowprox S954. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
-
37
Handling (owners)
Snowprox S954 +2966Why this score
Source I FIT Snowprox S954 Reviews found online 37 66 -
–
Efficiency
No comparison58Why this score
Source I FIT Snowprox S954 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 4 tests – 58
Scores at a glance
| Category | Laufenn I FIT | Toyo Snowprox S954 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 51 | 63 |
| Dry | 50 | 72 |
| Wet | 43 | 68 |
| Snow | 63 | 48 |
| Comfort | 55 | 62 |
| Noise | – | 69 |
| Treadwear | 54 | 63 |
| Handling (owners) | 37 | 66 |
| Efficiency | – | 58 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Not important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Recomputed
Headline score
51
/ 100
I FIT
63
/ 100
Snowprox S954
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
The professional test results behind the scores
Per discipline: the average % of the best tire over every test both tires were in, and how many of those tests each one won. “Different tests” rows compare results from separate tests.
In the overall rankings of 1 tests that ran both, Laufenn I FIT finished ahead 0 times and Toyo Snowprox S954 1 times.
| Discipline | Category | I FIT | Snowprox S954 | Δ | Head-to-head |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wet Braking | Wet | 74% | 86% | −11.8 | 0–1 in 1 shared test Newest: 2019 Winter Tyre Test Market Overview · 225/45 R17 |
| Also published by the testers (not in the score) | |||||
| Overall Ranking | Overall | #47/45 | #27/45 | – | 0–1 in 1 shared test Newest: 2019 Winter Tyre Test Market Overview · 225/45 R17 |
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A I FIT
Pros
- Acceptable traction in snow and ice conditions
- Comfortable and quiet ride quality when new
- Affordable budget-oriented pricing as a Hankook sub-brand
Cons
- Catastrophically poor grip and high risk of aquaplaning on wet and cold roads
- Sudden loss of traction without warning, inspiring low confidence
- Rapid performance degradation after the first or second season
Tire B Snowprox S954
Pros
- Excellent value for the price point
- Strong dry road handling and grip
- Predictable steering feedback near the limit
Cons
- Inconsistent wet weather traction
- Reported understeer on roundabouts and wet surfaces
- Mixed reliability compared to premium winter tire alternatives
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Laufenn I FIT | B · Toyo Snowprox S954 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Winter | Winter |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | 4 | 52 |
| Rim diameters | 14″ – 18″ | 16″ – 21″ |
| Sizes in common | 2 | 2 |
Which one should you actually buy?
51
/ 100
Laufenn I FIT
63
/ 100
Toyo Snowprox S954
Winner: Toyo Snowprox S954 — better handling, wet and dry. Pick the Laufenn I FIT if snow matters most to you. Laufenn I FIT rests on little evidence so far (1 test, 7 reviews), so read this result as provisional.
Pick tire B
You enjoy sharp, responsive handling
Toyo Snowprox S954 scores 66 vs 37 on handling.
Pick tire B
Your priority is wet-weather safety
Toyo Snowprox S954 scores 68 vs 43 on wet.
Pick tire B
You want the most grip on dry roads
Toyo Snowprox S954 scores 72 vs 50 on dry.
Pick tire A
You drive through snowy winters
Laufenn I FIT scores 63 vs 48 on snow.
Tire A · Laufenn I FIT
Tire B · Toyo Snowprox S954
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
I FIT or Snowprox S954?
Which is better in the wet, I FIT or Snowprox S954?
Toyo Snowprox S954, 68 vs 43 on our wet score.
Which grips better on dry roads, I FIT or Snowprox S954?
Toyo Snowprox S954, 72 vs 50 on our dry score.
Which is better in snow, I FIT or Snowprox S954?
Laufenn I FIT, 63 vs 48 on our snow score.
Which is more comfortable, I FIT or Snowprox S954?
Toyo Snowprox S954, 62 vs 55 on our comfort score.
Which lasts longer, I FIT or Snowprox S954?
Toyo Snowprox S954, 63 vs 54 on our treadwear score.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology