Tests 66 · 11 tests Owners 80 · 11 reviews
Best test result: #1 of 10 in 2026 Auto Zeitung 18 Inch Summer Tyre Test (noise)
Head-to-head
Updated
Laufenn S Fit EQ+ vs Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 11 + 9 road tests and 11 + 1,383 owner reviews. How we score
Pilot Sport 4 SUV is ahead, 80–72
Add your size for an exact match
/R
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests 80 · 9 tests Owners 79 · 1,383 reviews
Best test result: #1 of 12 in 2023 Best SUV Tyres Tested (wet braking)
“Loving my new Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV tires and Enkei Raijin wheels”
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
82
Dry
Pilot Sport 4 SUV +486Why this score
Source S Fit EQ+ Pilot Sport 4 SUV Professional tests (TWG score) · 10 / 9 tests 80 86 Reviews found online 85 86 S Fit EQ+: 60% × 79.7 + 40% × 84.7 = 82
Pilot Sport 4 SUV: 60% × 86.1 + 40% × 85.9 = 86
-
75
Wet
Pilot Sport 4 SUV +1691Why this score
Source S Fit EQ+ Pilot Sport 4 SUV Professional tests (TWG score) · 11 / 9 tests 73 93 Reviews found online 78 86 S Fit EQ+: 60% × 73.5 + 40% × 78.2 = 75
Pilot Sport 4 SUV: 60% × 93.4 + 40% × 86.4 = 91
-
73
Comfort
S Fit EQ+ +964Why this score
Source S Fit EQ+ Pilot Sport 4 SUV Professional tests (TWG score) · 2 / 2 tests 66 54 Reviews found online 77 71 S Fit EQ+: 40% × 66.4 + 60% × 77.1 = 73
Pilot Sport 4 SUV: 40% × 54 + 60% × 70.5 = 64
-
73
Noise
S Fit EQ+ +1558Why this score
Source S Fit EQ+ Pilot Sport 4 SUV Professional tests (TWG score) · 5 / 9 tests 77 53 Reviews found online ≈ 66 (est.) ≈ 66 (est.) S Fit EQ+: 60% × 76.8 + 40% × 66.3 (est.) = 73
Pilot Sport 4 SUV: 60% × 52.5 + 40% × 66.3 (est.) = 58
No owner ratings of noise for S Fit EQ+ or Pilot Sport 4 SUV. The owner half is the owners’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests, so the tests say nothing about how owners would rate it.
-
56
Treadwear
Pilot Sport 4 SUV +1672Why this score
Source S Fit EQ+ Pilot Sport 4 SUV Professional tests (TWG score) · 5 / 1 tests 43 77 Reviews found online 76 65 S Fit EQ+: 60% × 43.2 + 40% × 76.2 = 56
Pilot Sport 4 SUV: 60% × 77 + 40% × 65.3 = 72
-
83
Handling (owners)
Level83Why this score
Source S Fit EQ+ Pilot Sport 4 SUV Reviews found online 83 83 -
73
Efficiency
S Fit EQ+ +964Why this score
Source S Fit EQ+ Pilot Sport 4 SUV Professional tests (TWG score) · 6 / 9 tests 73 64
Scores at a glance
| Category | Laufenn S Fit EQ+ | Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 72 | 80 |
| Dry | 82 | 86 |
| Wet | 75 | 91 |
| Comfort | 73 | 64 |
| Noise | 73 | 58 |
| Treadwear | 56 | 72 |
| Handling (owners) | 83 | 83 |
| Efficiency | 73 | 64 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Not important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score
72
/ 100
S Fit EQ+
80
/ 100
Pilot Sport 4 SUV
The professional test results behind the scores
Per discipline: the average % of the best tire over every test both tires were in, and how many of those tests each one won. “Different tests” rows compare results from separate tests.
| Discipline | Category | S Fit EQ+ | Pilot Sport 4 SUV | Δ | Head-to-head |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dry Braking | Dry | 93% #8/10 · 2026 Auto Zeitung 18 Inch Summer Tyre Test | 95% #6/9 · 2026 Summer SUV Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Dry Handling | Dry | 98% #6/10 · 2026 Auto Zeitung 18 Inch Summer Tyre Test | 98% #5/9 · 2026 Summer SUV Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Dry Handling (tester's mark) | Dry | 96% #3/10 · 2021 Motor Summer Tyre Test | 100% #1/6 · 2025 Vi Bilagare Summer EV Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Curved Aquaplaning | Wet | 77% #20/20 · 2025 Auto Bild Summer Performance Tyre Test | 99% #3/9 · 2026 Summer SUV Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Straight Aquaplaning | Wet | 96% #9/10 · 2026 Auto Zeitung 18 Inch Summer Tyre Test | 100% #1/9 · 2026 Summer SUV Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Wet Braking | Wet | 81% #10/10 · 2026 Auto Zeitung 18 Inch Summer Tyre Test | 95% #5/9 · 2026 Summer SUV Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Wet Circle | Wet | 91% #8/10 · 2026 Auto Zeitung 18 Inch Summer Tyre Test | 98% #3/9 · 2026 Summer SUV Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Wet Handling | Wet | 94% #9/10 · 2026 Auto Zeitung 18 Inch Summer Tyre Test | 97% #5/9 · 2026 Summer SUV Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Comfort (tester's mark) | Comfort | 50% #7/10 · 2026 Auto Zeitung 18 Inch Summer Tyre Test | 40% #4/6 · 2025 Vi Bilagare Summer EV Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Noise | Noise | 100% #1/10 · 2026 Auto Zeitung 18 Inch Summer Tyre Test | 93% #6/9 · 2026 Summer SUV Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Abrasion | Treadwear | 73% #7/10 · 2026 Auto Zeitung 18 Inch Summer Tyre Test | 88% #3/8 · 2024 EV Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Wear | Treadwear | 73% #7/10 · 2026 Auto Zeitung 18 Inch Summer Tyre Test | 97% #2/8 · 2024 EV Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Rolling Resistance | Efficiency | 88% #5/10 · 2026 Auto Zeitung 18 Inch Summer Tyre Test | 86% #6/9 · 2026 Summer SUV Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Also published by the testers (not in the score) | |||||
| Price | Cost | 73% #2/10 · 2021 Motor Summer Tyre Test | 49% #11/12 · 2023 Best SUV Tyres Tested | – | Different tests |
| Total Cost of Ownership | Cost | #3/10 2026 Auto Zeitung 18 Inch Summer Tyre Test | #7/8 2024 EV Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Value | Cost | 92% #2/10 · 2026 Auto Zeitung 18 Inch Summer Tyre Test | 62% #7/8 · 2024 EV Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Overall Ranking | Overall | #9/10 2026 Auto Zeitung 18 Inch Summer Tyre Test | #5/9 2026 Summer SUV Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A S Fit EQ+
Pros
- Good to excellent dry grip, traction and handling, with several reviewers noting stable, confident behavior
- Wet grip described as decent to excellent, with plenty of grip in both conditions
- Excellent value; frequently compared favorably with Continental, Goodyear, Michelin and Hankook tires at a much lower price
Cons
- Road noise noted as louder than expected by some reviewers, with one reporting a marked increase after 2,500 km
- Ride can feel stiff or harder than needed, and one reviewer found the tires became hard and uncomfortable below 10°C
- Longevity is uncertain; reviewers estimate roughly 18,000-20,000 miles from one set, and others are unsure how long they will last
Tire B Pilot Sport 4 SUV
Pros
- Outstanding grip and safety in both wet and dry conditions
- Precise steering response and enhanced cornering stability for heavy SUVs
- Noticeable improvement in ride comfort and overall handling
Cons
- Higher-than-average purchase price
- Increased road noise reported by some users as the tread wears down
- Faster tread wear and shorter mileage lifespan under aggressive driving or heavy vehicle loads
What real owners are saying
From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score
Tire A
Laufenn S Fit EQ+
We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.
Tire B
Positive
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV
Community members generally praise the Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV for its strong grip, handling performance, and SUV-specific design. Users frequently consider it an upgrade over OEM options like the Latitude Sport 3, though some discuss its premium price, summer temperature limitations, and expected tread longevity.
subaruoutback.org
·1 upvote ·2021-10-17
“The CrossClimate2 is supposed to be better in every way compared to the prior generations, including less rolling resistance (better fuel economy). Most Tire Rack reviews are from people who have only driven on tires for a short time so when there are tread life ratings from consumers I don't know how accurate it is. My Michelin Pilot Sport4SUV summer tires have 1500 miles on them and started at 9/32nds and are still 9/32nds (all 4 corners) with some very aggressive driving (testing rear sway bars) and only have 200 treadwear rating.”
bobistheoilguy.com
·2022-04-22
“Figured I would update this thread. Ended up buying a set of four brand new 18" Saab 9-7X wheels that were shipped over, and went with Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV tires in 255/55R18 109Y XL flavor. This is the first set of French made Michelins I've purchased, and they all were manufactured in December 2021. Also got some chrome McGard spline drive lug nuts. The ride is definitely firmer than it was compared to the 255/60R17 106V tires on there previously, but that's a good thing in my book. Only put 18 miles on them so far, so I can't say all that much. However, I definitely like them so far.”
rennlist.com
“Have a 2014 CTTS with 21" wheels. Just had Michelin PilotSport4 SUV All-season put on. Before that had Michelin PilotSport4S. Have about 1K miles on the new tires, and no experience with it in winter weather yet, but prefer the ride quality over the PS4S. The PS4SUV are a softer ride, yet still have plenty of grip when I hit the "Sport" button. IMO, the PS4S is overkill for the Cayenne. Obviously, subjective and YMMV. Does your wife engage in "spirited" driving? As background, I have PS4S tires on my 2016 Spyder and love them.”
Top themes
#grip and handling#SUV-specific performance#tread life longevity#Latitude Sport 3 comparison#summer tire limitations#premium pricing
Based on 25 community posts
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Laufenn S Fit EQ+ | B · Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer | Summer |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | SUV and 4x4 |
| Sizes available | 74 | 65 |
| Rim diameters | 15″ – 20″ | 17″ – 23″ |
| UTQG | 360 A A | 220 - 320 A - AA A |
| Sizes in common | 12 | 12 |
Which one should you actually buy?
72
/ 100
Laufenn S Fit EQ+
80
/ 100
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV
Winner: Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV — better wet, treadwear and dry. Pick the Laufenn S Fit EQ+ if noise, comfort and efficiency matter most to you.
Pick tire B
Your priority is wet-weather safety
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV scores 91 vs 75 on wet.
Pick tire B
You want the longest tread life
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV scores 72 vs 56 on treadwear.
Pick tire A
You want a quieter cabin
Laufenn S Fit EQ+ scores 73 vs 58 on noise.
Pick tire A
You want the most comfortable ride
Laufenn S Fit EQ+ scores 73 vs 64 on comfort.
Tire A · Laufenn S Fit EQ+
Tire B · Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
S Fit EQ+ or Pilot Sport 4 SUV?
Which is better in the wet, S Fit EQ+ or Pilot Sport 4 SUV?
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV, 91 vs 75 on our wet score.
Which grips better on dry roads, S Fit EQ+ or Pilot Sport 4 SUV?
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV, 86 vs 82 on our dry score.
Which is quieter, S Fit EQ+ or Pilot Sport 4 SUV?
Laufenn S Fit EQ+, 73 vs 58 on our noise score.
Which is more comfortable, S Fit EQ+ or Pilot Sport 4 SUV?
Laufenn S Fit EQ+, 73 vs 64 on our comfort score.
Which lasts longer, S Fit EQ+ or Pilot Sport 4 SUV?
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV, 72 vs 56 on our treadwear score.
Which rolls more easily, S Fit EQ+ or Pilot Sport 4 SUV?
Laufenn S Fit EQ+, 73 vs 64 on our efficiency score.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology