Tests – · none yet Owners 61 · 6 reviews
Head-to-head
Updated
Michelin Anakee 3 vs Yokohama A539 — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): 60% professional tests, 40% owner reviews.
A539 is ahead, 69–63
Add your size for an exact match
/R
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
63
Dry
A539 +568Why this score
Source Anakee 3 A539 Reviews found online 61 68 -
62
Wet
A539 +870Why this score
Source Anakee 3 A539 Reviews found online 59 70 -
64
Comfort
A539 +569Why this score
Source Anakee 3 A539 Reviews found online 58 70 -
63
Treadwear
A539 +366Why this score
Source Anakee 3 A539 Reviews found online 62 66 -
62
Handling
A539 +1274Why this score
Source Anakee 3 A539 Reviews found online 62 74
Scores at a glance
| Category | Michelin Anakee 3 | Yokohama A539 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 63 | 69 |
| Dry | 63 | 68 |
| Wet | 62 | 70 |
| Comfort | 64 | 69 |
| Treadwear | 63 | 66 |
| Handling | 62 | 74 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Less important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score
63
/ 100
Anakee 3
69
/ 100
A539
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A Anakee 3
Pros
- Impressive tread longevity and durability
- Reliable performance for long-distance touring
- Solid construction quality associated with the Michelin brand
Cons
- High levels of road noise
- Unpredictable or 'scary' handling in wet conditions
- Lack of feedback and confidence-inspiring grip in certain scenarios
Tire B A539
Pros
- Excellent dry and wet cornering grip
- Predictable and dependable handling during spirited driving
- Good braking performance
Cons
- Can lose traction easily when cold or under heavy throttle
- Potential for wheel spin in wet conditions for quicker or more powerful cars
- Can wear relatively quickly due to a softer rubber compound
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Michelin Anakee 3 | B · Yokohama A539 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | All Season | Summer |
| Vehicle type | Motorcycle | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | — | 6 |
| Rim diameters | — | 12″ – 14″ |
Which one should you actually buy?
63
/ 100
Michelin Anakee 3
69
/ 100
Yokohama A539
Winner: Yokohama A539 — better handling, wet and dry. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Pick tire B
You enjoy sharp, responsive handling
Yokohama A539 scores 74 vs 62 on handling.
Pick tire B
Your priority is wet-weather safety
Yokohama A539 scores 70 vs 62 on wet.
Pick tire B
You want the most grip on dry roads
Yokohama A539 scores 68 vs 63 on dry.
Pick tire B
You want the most comfortable ride
Yokohama A539 scores 69 vs 64 on comfort.
Tire A · Michelin Anakee 3
Tire B · Yokohama A539
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.