Head-to-head Updated

Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV vs Pirelli Scorpion Zero Asimmetrico — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 4 + 0 road tests and 2,560 + 21 owner reviews. How we score

CrossClimate 2 SUV is ahead, 84–56

Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV
Tire AMichelin

CrossClimate 2 SUV

All Season

± 5

Tests 87 · 4 tests Owners 83 · 2,560 reviews

Best test result: #1 of 10 in 2023 SUV All Season Tyre Test (dry braking)

“I also live in Michigan and we get plenty of all four seasons. I put CC2s on my 2017 RAV4 Hybrid. They have handled all weather conditions up to and including moderate snow with aplomb. If I had to buy new tires tomorrow, I'd get another set.”

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 87

    Dry

    CrossClimate 2 SUV +29
    58
    Why this score
    SourceCrossClimate 2 SUVScorpion Zero Asimmetrico
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 4 / – tests86≈ 62 (est.)
    Reviews found online8953

    CrossClimate 2 SUV: 60% × 85.8 + 40% × 88.7 = 87

    Scorpion Zero Asimmetrico: 60% × 61.6 (est.) + 40% × 52.7 = 58

    No road tests of dry for Scorpion Zero Asimmetrico. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).

  2. 84

    Wet

    CrossClimate 2 SUV +28
    56
    Why this score
    SourceCrossClimate 2 SUVScorpion Zero Asimmetrico
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 4 / – tests84≈ 59 (est.)
    Reviews found online8550

    CrossClimate 2 SUV: 60% × 84 + 40% × 84.9 = 84

    Scorpion Zero Asimmetrico: 60% × 59.4 (est.) + 40% × 50.3 = 56

    No road tests of wet for Scorpion Zero Asimmetrico. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

  3. 91

    Snow

    CrossClimate 2 SUV +35
    56
    Why this score
    SourceCrossClimate 2 SUVScorpion Zero Asimmetrico
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 4 / – tests98≈ 62 (est.)
    Reviews found online8047

    CrossClimate 2 SUV: 60% × 97.6 + 40% × 80.4 = 91

    Scorpion Zero Asimmetrico: 60% × 61.8 (est.) + 40% × 46.8 = 56

    No road tests of snow for Scorpion Zero Asimmetrico. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.37).

  4. 86

    Comfort

    CrossClimate 2 SUV +31
    55
    Why this score
    SourceCrossClimate 2 SUVScorpion Zero Asimmetrico
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 2 / – tests82≈ 65 (est.)
    Reviews found online8848

    CrossClimate 2 SUV: 40% × 82.3 + 60% × 88.3 = 86

    Scorpion Zero Asimmetrico: 40% × 65.2 (est.) + 60% × 47.8 = 55

    No road tests of comfort for Scorpion Zero Asimmetrico. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.

  5. 77

    Noise

    CrossClimate 2 SUV +18
    59
    Why this score
    SourceCrossClimate 2 SUVScorpion Zero Asimmetrico
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 4 / – tests83≈ 67 (est.)
    Reviews found online≈ 67 (est.)47

    CrossClimate 2 SUV: 60% × 83.2 + 40% × 66.6 (est.) = 77

    Scorpion Zero Asimmetrico: 60% × 66.6 (est.) + 40% × 47.3 = 59

    No owner ratings of noise for CrossClimate 2 SUV. The owner half is the owners’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests, so the tests say nothing about how owners would rate it.

    No road tests of noise for Scorpion Zero Asimmetrico. The test half is the tested tires’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.

  6. 70

    Treadwear

    CrossClimate 2 SUV +20
    50
    Why this score
    SourceCrossClimate 2 SUVScorpion Zero Asimmetrico
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 68 (est.)≈ 57 (est.)
    Reviews found online7339

    CrossClimate 2 SUV: 60% × 68.4 (est.) + 40% × 72.6 = 70

    Scorpion Zero Asimmetrico: 60% × 56.8 (est.) + 40% × 39.4 = 50

    No road tests of treadwear for CrossClimate 2 SUV. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).

    No road tests of treadwear for Scorpion Zero Asimmetrico. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).

  7. 89

    Handling (owners)

    CrossClimate 2 SUV +36
    53
    Why this score
    SourceCrossClimate 2 SUVScorpion Zero Asimmetrico
    Reviews found online8953
  8. 87

    Efficiency

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourceCrossClimate 2 SUVScorpion Zero Asimmetrico
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 3 / – tests87–
Scores at a glance
Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV vs Pirelli Scorpion Zero Asimmetrico: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryMichelin CrossClimate 2 SUVPirelli Scorpion Zero Asimmetrico
Relative Score 84 56
Dry 87 58
Wet 84 56
Snow 91 56
Comfort 86 55
Noise 77 59
Treadwear 70 50
Handling (owners) 89 53
Efficiency 87 –

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Not important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Recomputed
Headline score
± 5

CrossClimate 2 SUV

± 7

Scorpion Zero Asimmetrico

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A CrossClimate 2 SUV

Pros

  • Exceptional wet, ice, and snow traction that inspires winter-weather driving confidence
  • Significantly improved ride comfort and impact absorption over road imperfections
  • Impressive tread life and durability yielding long-term value

Cons

  • Higher initial purchase price compared to competitors
  • Minor fuel economy or range drop reported by some users, especially on hybrids and EVs
  • Occasional low-pitched or increased road noise at highway speeds (between 50-70 MPH)
All owner themes in the CrossClimate 2 SUV review

Tire B Scorpion Zero Asimmetrico

Pros

  • Strong dry-road grip and handling performance
  • Capably handles light snow and winter conditions for an all-season tire
  • Favorable tread wear and longevity reported by some high-mileage users

Cons

  • Significantly compromised wet-weather traction and high risk of aquaplaning
  • Poor grip and understeer/oversteer tendencies in cold or damp temperatures below 15°C
  • Excessive road noise and a harsh, stiff ride reported by multiple drivers
All owner themes in the Scorpion Zero Asimmetrico review

What real owners are saying

From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score

Tire A

Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV

Positive

Community sentiment for the Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV is largely positive, with drivers consistently praising its exceptional grip and safety in snow, slush, and heavy rain. The primary trade-offs frequently cited are reduced fuel/range efficiency—particularly noted by EV owners—along with a premium price tag, directional rotation limitations, and mixed opinions on road noise.

r/ModelY ·4 upvotes ·2026-06-01

“New CrossClimate 2 tires almost stranded my family. Massive efficiency drop on Model Y. Just a heads-up for anyone swapping to Michelin CrossClimate 2s. Put a set on my Model Y about 3 weeks ago from Discount Tire and just did a road trip from Denver to Taos, NM with my wife and two toddlers. We charged up to 90% at the Pueblo Supercharger, and the Tesla app estimated we would arrive in Taos with 15% battery remaining. Well, the new tire efficiency hit is incredibly real. The range dropped so fast that we were tracking to hit 0% and had to make an emergency Type 2 charging stop on the way just to make sure we didn't get stranded with the kids in the car. I’m now seriously thinking about taking advantage of Discount Tire's return policy and going back to the OEM Continental ProContact RX. Has anyone else faced similar problems or massive efficiency drops when switching to the CC2s? Does the range eventually get better after a break-in period, or should I just cut my losses and swap back to the Continentals? I need something reliable for road trips with the family, so I'd love to hear your suggestions and experiences!”

r/CarTalkUK ·2 upvotes ·2024-11-07

“Opinions please ... Michelin Primacy 4+ vs Michelin Cross Climate 2 SUV? Hi all ... I'm coming up to tyre replacement time so I've looking at what's around. Currently on Bridgestone Turanzas cos that's what came with the car, but I'm not hugely impressed with their lifespan, they seem to pick up sidewall damage easily and the tread seems to age quickly. Which is not much cop when all i do is commute round Southern England. I've pretty much settled on Michelin Primacy 4+ or Cross Climate 2 SUV but I'm having difficulty making a final decision. So I thought the hivemind might settle this: in your experience which one is best for lifespan and fuel consumption? Car is a 2018 SEAT Ateca with 18" alloys. Edit: well guys, I went with the Cross Climates, thanks for the advice!”

mbworld.org

“Quote: Originally Posted by Gitzer I think the advice on this thread is exactly right. In fact, don’t drive your new car if there is any snow or ice on the road. Get the CC2s or equivalent immediately. You are going to need them next winter anyway. Lots of people are recommending, the CCs but aren’t they all-seasons? It seems like if I’m already stuck owning Summer tires, I’m better off buying an winter set and alternating, vs owning a Summer a All Season, no? What’s killing me is no one has or can order winter tires this late in the season. it’s really frustrating that the brand new luxury car doesn’t come with all seasons, or some tires that are even safe to opperate where the vehicle was sold. Im literally going to have to rent a a car on cold days to keep my family safe ☹️”

Top themes
#Snow and winter traction#Wet grip and hydroplaning resistance#EV range and fuel efficiency impact#Road noise and ride comfort#High price and premium value#Directional tread rotation limits#Treadwear and longevity

Based on 97 community posts

Tire B

Pirelli Scorpion Zero Asimmetrico

We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV B · Pirelli Scorpion Zero Asimmetrico
CategoryAll SeasonAll Season
Vehicle typeSUV and 4x4SUV and 4x4
Sizes available3519
Rim diameters17″ – 22″18″ – 28″
Tread depth—10/32″
UTQG—420 A A
Sidewall—Blackwall
Max pressure—50 psi
Sizes in common66

Which one should you actually buy?

Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV

Pirelli Scorpion Zero Asimmetrico

Winner: Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV — better handling, snow and comfort. It leads or ties in every category we score.

Pick tire A You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV scores 89 vs 53 on handling.

Pick tire A You drive through snowy winters

Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV scores 91 vs 56 on snow.

Pick tire A You want the most comfortable ride

Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV scores 86 vs 55 on comfort.

Pick tire A You want the most grip on dry roads

Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV scores 87 vs 58 on dry.

Tire A · Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV
Tire B · Pirelli Scorpion Zero Asimmetrico

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

CrossClimate 2 SUV or Scorpion Zero Asimmetrico?

Which is better in the wet, CrossClimate 2 SUV or Scorpion Zero Asimmetrico?

Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV, 84 vs 56 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, CrossClimate 2 SUV or Scorpion Zero Asimmetrico?

Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV, 87 vs 58 on our dry score.

Which is better in snow, CrossClimate 2 SUV or Scorpion Zero Asimmetrico?

Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV, 91 vs 56 on our snow score.

Which is quieter, CrossClimate 2 SUV or Scorpion Zero Asimmetrico?

Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV, 77 vs 59 on our noise score.

Which is more comfortable, CrossClimate 2 SUV or Scorpion Zero Asimmetrico?

Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV, 86 vs 55 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, CrossClimate 2 SUV or Scorpion Zero Asimmetrico?

Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV, 70 vs 50 on our treadwear score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology