Head-to-head Updated

Michelin CrossClimate SUV vs Bridgestone Blizzak LM-32 — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): 60% professional tests, 40% owner reviews.

CrossClimate SUV is ahead, 74–67

Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Tire AMichelin

CrossClimate SUV

All Season

Tests 81 · 4 tests Owners 72 · 23 reviews

Best test result: #2 of 8 in 2018 Auto Bild SUV All Season Tyre Test (overall ranking)

Blizzak LM-32

Winter

Tests – · none yet Owners 67 · 20 reviews

Best test result: #9 of 13 in 2010 Auto Zeitung Winter Tyre Test (overall ranking)

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 81

    Dry

    CrossClimate SUV +13
    68
    Why this score
    SourceCrossClimate SUVBlizzak LM-32
    Professional tests (TWG score)85–
    Reviews found online7468
  2. 82

    Wet

    CrossClimate SUV +13
    69
    Why this score
    SourceCrossClimate SUVBlizzak LM-32
    Professional tests (TWG score)84–
    Reviews found online7969
  3. 70

    Snow

    CrossClimate SUV +2
    68
    Why this score
    SourceCrossClimate SUVBlizzak LM-32
    Professional tests (TWG score)69–
    Reviews found online7266
  4. 70

    Comfort

    CrossClimate SUV +3
    67
    Why this score
    SourceCrossClimate SUVBlizzak LM-32
    Reviews found online7164
  5. 73

    Noise

    CrossClimate SUV +7
    66
    Why this score
    SourceCrossClimate SUVBlizzak LM-32
    Professional tests (TWG score)75–
    Reviews found online7166
  6. 65

    Treadwear

    Blizzak LM-32 +2
    67
    Why this score
    SourceCrossClimate SUVBlizzak LM-32
    Reviews found online6567
  7. 70

    Handling

    CrossClimate SUV +6
    64
    Why this score
    SourceCrossClimate SUVBlizzak LM-32
    Reviews found online7064
Scores at a glance
Michelin CrossClimate SUV vs Bridgestone Blizzak LM-32: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryMichelin CrossClimate SUVBridgestone Blizzak LM-32
Relative Score 74 67
Dry 81 68
Wet 82 69
Snow 70 68
Comfort 70 67
Noise 73 66
Treadwear 65 67
Handling 70 64

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Less important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Less important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score

CrossClimate SUV

Blizzak LM-32

The professional test results behind the scores

Each result is shown as % of the best tire in that test. “Same test” rows are the strictest comparison: both tires were measured side by side.

DisciplineCategoryCrossClimate SUVBlizzak LM-32ΔBoth?
Overall Ranking Overall 50% #2/8 · 2018 Auto Bild SUV All Season Tyre Test 11% #9/13 · 2010 Auto Zeitung Winter Tyre Test +38.9 Different tests

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A CrossClimate SUV

Pros

  • Exceptional all-weather traction, particularly in wet, cold, and light snow conditions.
  • High levels of ride comfort and low cabin noise for most users.
  • Strong durability and longevity with minimal tread wear reported by many owners.

Cons

  • Reports of increased road noise or 'growling' as the tire ages.
  • Ride quality can feel overly firm or harsh on certain vehicle suspensions.
  • Some users noted a decline in wet-weather performance as the tire reaches the end of its life.
All owner themes in the CrossClimate SUV review

Tire B Blizzak LM-32

Pros

  • Exceptional traction and reliability in deep snow and winter storms
  • Stable and satisfying handling on cold, dry roads
  • Good resistance to aquaplaning and solid durability/tread life reported by some users

Cons

  • Poor and unpredictable wet weather grip, leading to wheel spin and sliding
  • Noticeable road noise and humming that increases as the tread wears down
  • Vague steering feel and lackluster performance under quick acceleration
All owner themes in the Blizzak LM-32 review

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Michelin CrossClimate SUV B · Bridgestone Blizzak LM-32
CategoryAll SeasonWinter
Vehicle typeSUV and 4x4SUV and 4x4
Sizes available3335
Rim diameters16″ – 20″15″ – 20″

Which one should you actually buy?

Michelin CrossClimate SUV

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-32

Winner: Michelin CrossClimate SUV — better dry, wet and noise. It leads or ties in every category we score.

Pick tire A You want the most grip on dry roads

Michelin CrossClimate SUV scores 81 vs 68 on dry.

Pick tire A Your priority is wet-weather safety

Michelin CrossClimate SUV scores 82 vs 69 on wet.

Pick tire A You want a quieter cabin

Michelin CrossClimate SUV scores 73 vs 66 on noise.

Pick tire A You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Michelin CrossClimate SUV scores 70 vs 64 on handling.

Tire A · Michelin CrossClimate SUV
Tire B · Bridgestone Blizzak LM-32

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.

74

Leads

CrossClimate SUV

Amazon