Tests 75 · 2 tests Owners 74 · 152 reviews
Best test result: #1 of 14 in 2018 New and Worn Summer Tyre Test (noise)
Head-to-head
Updated
Michelin CrossClimate vs Vredestein Quatrac — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 2 + 18 road tests and 152 + 1,593 owner reviews. How we score
Quatrac is ahead, 80–74
Add your size for an exact match
/R
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests 81 · 18 tests Owners 78 · 1,593 reviews
Best test result: #1 of 30 in 2025 All Season 30 Tyre Braking Test (wet braking)
“Vredestein Quatrac and Hankook Kinergy 4S2 are good tyres. I prefer the vredestein quite comfortable tyres and quieter than the Hankook. But you can't go wrong with either of them.”
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
76
Dry
Quatrac +581Why this score
Source CrossClimate Quatrac Professional tests (TWG score) · 2 / 18 tests 78 83 Reviews found online 74 78 CrossClimate: 60% × 77.9 + 40% × 73.5 = 76
Quatrac: 60% × 82.9 + 40% × 77.6 = 81
-
76
Wet
Quatrac +1591Why this score
Source CrossClimate Quatrac Professional tests (TWG score) · 2 / 18 tests 75 95 Reviews found online 78 85 CrossClimate: 60% × 75.4 + 40% × 77.8 = 76
Quatrac: 60% × 94.6 + 40% × 85.2 = 91
-
69
Snow
Quatrac +574Why this score
Source CrossClimate Quatrac Professional tests (TWG score) · 2 / 13 tests 71 74 Reviews found online 65 73 CrossClimate: 60% × 70.9 + 40% × 65.4 = 69
Quatrac: 60% × 74.3 + 40% × 72.9 = 74
-
74
Comfort
Level74Why this score
Source CrossClimate Quatrac Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 3 tests ≈ 70 (est.) 74 Reviews found online 76 74 CrossClimate: 40% × 70.1 (est.) + 60% × 75.8 = 74
Quatrac: 40% × 74.5 + 60% × 73.8 = 74
No road tests of comfort for CrossClimate. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).
-
69
Noise
Quatrac +574Why this score
Source CrossClimate Quatrac Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / 13 tests 71 78 Reviews found online ≈ 66 (est.) ≈ 66 (est.) CrossClimate: 60% × 70.7 + 40% × 66.4 (est.) = 69
Quatrac: 60% × 78.3 + 40% × 66.4 (est.) = 74
No owner ratings of noise for CrossClimate or Quatrac. The owner half is the owners’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests, so the tests say nothing about how owners would rate it.
-
74
Treadwear
Quatrac +175Why this score
Source CrossClimate Quatrac Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / 7 tests 74 73 Reviews found online 75 77 CrossClimate: 60% × 73.8 + 40% × 74.9 = 74
Quatrac: 60% × 73.2 + 40% × 77 = 75
-
73
Handling (owners)
Quatrac +376Why this score
Source CrossClimate Quatrac Reviews found online 73 76 -
76
Efficiency
CrossClimate +373Why this score
Source CrossClimate Quatrac Professional tests (TWG score) · 2 / 13 tests 76 73
Scores at a glance
| Category | Michelin CrossClimate | Vredestein Quatrac |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 74 | 80 |
| Dry | 76 | 81 |
| Wet | 76 | 91 |
| Snow | 69 | 74 |
| Comfort | 74 | 74 |
| Noise | 69 | 74 |
| Treadwear | 74 | 75 |
| Handling (owners) | 73 | 76 |
| Efficiency | 76 | 73 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Not important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score
74
/ 100
CrossClimate
80
/ 100
Quatrac
The professional test results behind the scores
Per discipline: the average % of the best tire over every test both tires were in, and how many of those tests each one won. “Different tests” rows compare results from separate tests.
| Discipline | Category | CrossClimate | Quatrac | Δ | Head-to-head |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dry Braking | Dry | 99% #2/14 · 2018 New and Worn Summer Tyre Test | 90% #8/9 · 2026 AMS All Season Tyre Test - 195/55 R16 | – | Different tests |
| Dry Handling | Dry | 90% #7/14 · 2018 New and Worn Summer Tyre Test | 99% #2/9 · 2026 AMS All Season Tyre Test - 195/55 R16 | – | Different tests |
| Straight Aquaplaning | Wet | 94% #4/11 · 2017 All Season VS Winter Tyre Test | 93% #6/9 · 2026 AMS All Season Tyre Test - 195/55 R16 | – | Different tests |
| Wet Braking | Wet | 87% #9/14 · 2018 New and Worn Summer Tyre Test | 100% #1/9 · 2026 AMS All Season Tyre Test - 195/55 R16 | – | Different tests |
| Wet Handling | Wet | 96% #4/14 · 2018 New and Worn Summer Tyre Test | 99% #2/9 · 2026 AMS All Season Tyre Test - 195/55 R16 | – | Different tests |
| Snow Braking | Snow | 91% #5/8 · 2017 Auto Bild All Season Tyre Test | 93% #7/9 · 2026 AMS All Season Tyre Test - 195/55 R16 | – | Different tests |
| Snow Handling | Snow | 99% #2/8 · 2017 Auto Bild All Season Tyre Test | 99% #4/9 · 2026 AMS All Season Tyre Test - 195/55 R16 | – | Different tests |
| Noise | Noise | 100% #1/14 · 2018 New and Worn Summer Tyre Test | 98% #6/9 · 2026 AMS All Season Tyre Test - 195/55 R16 | – | Different tests |
| Wear | Treadwear | 91% #4/10 · 2017 All Season Tyre Test | 95% #3/16 · 2026 ADAC All Season Tyre Test - 185/65 R15 | – | Different tests |
| Rolling Resistance | Efficiency | 100% #1/8 · 2017 Auto Bild All Season Tyre Test | 93% #3/9 · 2026 AMS All Season Tyre Test - 195/55 R16 | – | Different tests |
| Also published by the testers (not in the score) | |||||
| Total Cost of Ownership | Cost | #4/10 2017 All Season Tyre Test | #14/15 2025 AutoBild All Season Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Value | Cost | 65% #8/10 · 2017 All Season Tyre Test | 64% #12/15 · 2025 AutoBild All Season Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Overall Ranking | Overall | #9/9 2018 ADAC All Season Tyre Test | #2/9 2027 Auto Motor und Sport Winter Tire Test R16 | – | Different tests |
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A CrossClimate
Pros
- Exceptional tread life and durability
- Strong wet-weather grip and hydroplaning resistance
- Reliable traction in light snow and cold conditions
Cons
- Tendency to pick up and retain small stones in the tread pattern
- Noticeable drop in performance as tread depth decreases
- Potential for reduced fuel economy compared to dedicated summer tires
Tire B Quatrac
Pros
- Exceptional wet-weather traction and hydroplaning resistance
- Reliable year-round performance, including impressive grip in light to moderate snow and slush
- Quiet and comfortable ride quality on most road surfaces
Cons
- Increased road noise or humming that can develop or worsen as the tires age
- Faster-than-expected treadwear for some users, leading to shorter overall lifespan
- Softer sidewalls that can feel slightly mushy during aggressive cornering or contribute to a wandering sensation at high speeds
What real owners are saying
From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score
Tire A
Michelin CrossClimate
We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.
Tire B
Positive
Vredestein Quatrac
Community sentiment toward the Vredestein Quatrac is overwhelmingly positive, with drivers viewing it as one of the best mid-range all-weather tires available. Users frequently praise its reliable traction in wet and snowy conditions, along with its quiet and comfortable ride compared to rivals. While some owners note that stopping distances on ice or deep snow do not match dedicated winter tires and tread wear can vary, most consider it an exceptional value over premium brands like Michelin.
r/MiataNC
·2 upvotes ·2026-10-22
“I just put on a set of Vredestein Quatrac 205/50 R16 from Tire Rack. I am in central Iowa and plan on driving with them all winter.”
gr86.org
·2025-10-10
“Well the wheels are worth roughly $400-500 by themselves in "drive home and remove" condition. Could be a little higher or lower depending on the weather and the tides. Those particular tires look like about $232 each if it's 215/40/18 so half that for all 4 roughly is $500. I sold my 18" premium set off the new car for $1100 but wheels and tires were separated. Would have been $1200 but the doofus who separated the wheels and tires scratched them a little bit so I lowered it some. $372 is much too low on Ebay but $1200 is a good start point in here. They are slightly used but I still wouldn't settle for less than $800 and instead just sit on them until that happens. Don't let people tell you their worthless:”
r/tires
·2 upvotes ·2026-10-06
“How much life left? Vredestein Quatrac all-season tire with over 30.000miles Hi, I have been driving on these Vredestein Quatrac all-season for over 2 years and accumulated over 30.000miles/50.000kms. I read that these tires typically lasts until these milage, however, looking at the tires there seems to be still quite a bit of life left. I measered and got around of 5mm of tread left at the lowest point. Is this normal for an all-season tire to last this long? And how much life do you think these tires have left? Thanks!”
Top themes
#mid-range tire value#snow and winter performance#wet weather traction#quiet and comfortable ride#tread life longevity#all-weather capability
Based on 34 community posts
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Michelin CrossClimate | B · Vredestein Quatrac |
|---|---|---|
| Category | All Season | All Season |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | — | 39 |
| Rim diameters | — | 15″ – 18″ |
| UTQG | — | 180 A B |
Which one should you actually buy?
74
/ 100
Michelin CrossClimate
80
/ 100
Vredestein Quatrac
Winner: Vredestein Quatrac — better wet, dry and snow. Pick the Michelin CrossClimate if efficiency matters most to you.
Pick tire B
Your priority is wet-weather safety
Vredestein Quatrac scores 91 vs 76 on wet.
Pick tire B
You want the most grip on dry roads
Vredestein Quatrac scores 81 vs 76 on dry.
Pick tire B
You drive through snowy winters
Vredestein Quatrac scores 74 vs 69 on snow.
Pick tire B
You want a quieter cabin
Vredestein Quatrac scores 74 vs 69 on noise.
Tire A · Michelin CrossClimate
Tire B · Vredestein Quatrac
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
CrossClimate or Quatrac?
Which is better in the wet, CrossClimate or Quatrac?
Vredestein Quatrac, 91 vs 76 on our wet score.
Which grips better on dry roads, CrossClimate or Quatrac?
Vredestein Quatrac, 81 vs 76 on our dry score.
Which is better in snow, CrossClimate or Quatrac?
Vredestein Quatrac, 74 vs 69 on our snow score.
Which is quieter, CrossClimate or Quatrac?
Vredestein Quatrac, 74 vs 69 on our noise score.
Which is more comfortable, CrossClimate or Quatrac?
Neither, by our numbers: 74 vs 74 on the comfort score, within 3 points.
Which lasts longer, CrossClimate or Quatrac?
Neither, by our numbers: 74 vs 75 on the treadwear score, within 3 points.
Which rolls more easily, CrossClimate or Quatrac?
Michelin CrossClimate, 76 vs 73 on our efficiency score.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology