Head-to-head Updated

Michelin CrossClimate 2 vs General Grabber HTS60 — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 32 + 1 road tests and 21,600 + 492 owner reviews. How we score

CrossClimate 2 is ahead, 87–77

Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Michelin CrossClimate 2
Tire AMichelin

CrossClimate 2

All Season

± 4

Tests 87 · 32 tests Owners 87 · 21,600 reviews

Best test result: #1 of 35 in 2023 All Season Tyre 35 Set Shootout (dry braking)

“I have the 235 that is a little higher load rating (105 vs 103 stock and 99 for 225). I'm probably getting about a 10% range reduction, but worth it to me for the improved handling and lower braking distance. I work from home and I charge to 90% about once a week unless taking a longer drive. If I did a lot of longer trips it might be an issue, but I am very happy with these tires.”

General Grabber HTS60
Tire BGeneral

Grabber HTS60

All Season

± 7

Tests – · 1 test Owners 80 · 492 reviews

Best test result: #3 of 13 in 2022 Consumer Reports All Season Truck Tires (tested tread life (miles))

“Can’t speak for the specific iron man tires you’re looking at, but Carmax put a set of iMpve Gen 2 AS tires on our 300 when we bought it. In dry weather they were fine, wet they weren’t optimal (never hydroplaned, easy to light up the rear wheels) but manageable… god help you if there was snow. They were also worn to 3/32 in 20k miles. Discount Tire has some General Grabber HTS60’s which seem decent, though about $230 more than your most expensive example. If it were my car I’d throw some BFGoodrich Advantage TA Sport LT’s on it, I’m impressed by those.”

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 95

    Dry

    CrossClimate 2 +18
    77
    Why this score
    SourceCrossClimate 2Grabber HTS60
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 30 / – tests99≈ 74 (est.)
    Reviews found online8981

    CrossClimate 2: 60% × 99.1 + 40% × 88.5 = 95

    Grabber HTS60: 60% × 73.5 (est.) + 40% × 81 = 77

    No road tests of dry for Grabber HTS60. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).

  2. 87

    Wet

    CrossClimate 2 +8
    79
    Why this score
    SourceCrossClimate 2Grabber HTS60
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 30 / – tests83≈ 77 (est.)
    Reviews found online9282

    CrossClimate 2: 60% × 83.4 + 40% × 91.8 = 87

    Grabber HTS60: 60% × 76.9 (est.) + 40% × 81.8 = 79

    No road tests of wet for Grabber HTS60. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

  3. 91

    Snow

    CrossClimate 2 +19
    72
    Why this score
    SourceCrossClimate 2Grabber HTS60
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 26 / – tests99≈ 72 (est.)
    Reviews found online7873

    CrossClimate 2: 60% × 98.9 + 40% × 78.4 = 91

    Grabber HTS60: 60% × 71.6 (est.) + 40% × 73 = 72

    No road tests of snow for Grabber HTS60. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.37).

  4. 78

    Comfort

    CrossClimate 2 +1
    77
    Why this score
    SourceCrossClimate 2Grabber HTS60
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 3 / – tests65≈ 71 (est.)
    Reviews found online8780

    CrossClimate 2: 40% × 65.1 + 60% × 86.5 = 78

    Grabber HTS60: 40% × 71.2 (est.) + 60% × 80.2 = 77

    No road tests of comfort for Grabber HTS60. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.

  5. 80

    Noise

    CrossClimate 2 +7
    73
    Why this score
    SourceCrossClimate 2Grabber HTS60
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 19 / – tests79≈ 67 (est.)
    Reviews found online8384

    CrossClimate 2: 60% × 78.6 + 40% × 82.7 = 80

    Grabber HTS60: 60% × 66.6 (est.) + 40% × 83.6 = 73

    No road tests of noise for Grabber HTS60. The test half is the tested tires’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.

  6. 83

    Treadwear

    CrossClimate 2 +6
    77
    Why this score
    SourceCrossClimate 2Grabber HTS60
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 7 / 1 tests8174
    Reviews found online8782

    CrossClimate 2: 60% × 81.1 + 40% × 87 = 83

    Grabber HTS60: 60% × 73.7 + 40% × 82.2 = 77

  7. 82

    Handling (owners)

    CrossClimate 2 +3
    79
    Why this score
    SourceCrossClimate 2Grabber HTS60
    Reviews found online8279
  8. 90

    Efficiency

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourceCrossClimate 2Grabber HTS60
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 22 / – tests90–
Scores at a glance
Michelin CrossClimate 2 vs General Grabber HTS60: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryMichelin CrossClimate 2General Grabber HTS60
Relative Score 87 77
Dry 95 77
Wet 87 79
Snow 91 72
Comfort 78 77
Noise 80 73
Treadwear 83 77
Handling (owners) 82 79
Efficiency 90 –

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Not important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Recomputed
Headline score
± 4

CrossClimate 2

± 7

Grabber HTS60

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

The professional test results behind the scores

Per discipline: the average % of the best tire over every test both tires were in, and how many of those tests each one won. “Different tests” rows compare results from separate tests.

DisciplineCategoryCrossClimate 2Grabber HTS60ΔHead-to-head
Also published by the testers (not in the score)
Overall Ranking Overall #2/6 2026 Wybór Kierowców Winter Tire Test R17 #2/13 2022 Consumer Reports All Season Truck Tires – Different tests

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A CrossClimate 2

Pros

  • Exceptional grip and traction in snow, slush, and winter weather conditions
  • Strong braking and handling performance on dry and wet pavement
  • Long-lasting tread wear and durability

Cons

  • Higher initial purchase price
  • Slight negative impact on fuel economy / EV range for some drivers
  • Potential for increased road noise or harshness as the tires wear down
All owner themes in the CrossClimate 2 review

Tire B Grabber HTS60

Pros

  • Smooth and quiet highway ride quality
  • Great value and affordable price point compared to premium brands
  • Reliable all-season traction in wet, dry, and light winter conditions

Cons

  • Occasional reports of minor road noise or hum at higher speeds
  • Potential manufacturing inconsistencies, such as tires being out-of-round
  • Aggressive tread pattern can occasionally cause slight slippage on loose dirt or debris when taking off
All owner themes in the Grabber HTS60 review

What real owners are saying

From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score

Tire A

Michelin CrossClimate 2

Positive

The community overwhelmingly praises the Michelin CrossClimate 2 for its exceptional snow, ice, and wet-weather traction, often describing it as an ideal all-weather tire. While many drivers report a quiet, comfortable ride and solid durability, some users note potential downsides including reduced fuel or battery efficiency, road noise on certain surfaces, and premium pricing. A few commenters also point out that the tire may be overkill for regions without significant winter weather.

r/volt ·8 upvotes ·2026-09-18

“Michelin CrossClimate2 efficiency surprisingly good! Just put in a new set of Michelin CrossClimate2s to go along with a move from LA to New England. I was a bit worried about the mileage/range hit but figured the safety in the winter outweighed it. I'm pleasantly surprised! On an all-highway trip from Boston to New Jersey, gas MPG was a steady 42 mpgs and I got about 45 miles on the battery, although I drive like a grandma at the posted speed limits so I think I was close to 44 mpg/45 EV miles on the old OEM tires. Around town in suburbia in good weather I'm still running between 4.0-5.0 miles/kWh. I estimate, at worst, a 5% drop in efficiency. Pretty good considering the Michelins feel so much stickier!”

r/Subaru_Outback ·14 upvotes ·2024-01-17

“My Official review of the Cross Climate 2 tires. I put some new shoes on the Outback after reading some threads on here and decided with my weather here in Missouri the Cross Climate 2s were the best fit. In rain, they are great so no more sliding or hydroplaning what so ever. In snow, they are even more amazing. They grip extremely well. The one downside to them that concerns me, and I didn't think about this when I purchased them, is that fact you can't do a full tire rotation to them like conventional tires as they are directional so you can only do front to back and vise versa. For this reason I am concerned if I will get 60K out of them and avoid the inner/outer wear. Sure you can dismount the tire from the wheel and remount them but I had heard that's bad for them. Overall, they are excellent. If you are concerned about the tire rotation thing, I would say the Michelin Defenders or the Falkan Wildpeaks are probably a better bet. I plan on getting the Falkans next but hopefully that wont be for at least 50K more miles. Read more”

r/ecoboostmustang ·2 upvotes ·2025-07-28

“On a 2015 Highlander Hybrid, the CC2 is excellent anti-hydroplaning, wonderful snow and ice handling, both moving and stopping. I am a rideshare driver averaging 200 or so miles per day. The tires are only just now a bit noisier at 78,000 miles. Wear is down to 3/32 and went through a wild, heavy rain storm today with no lack of confidence whatsoever. Only downside is that >80 degrees F and gas mileage goes down by 2 mpg. Love the tires so much that I feel the slight loss during summer is still worth it.”

Top themes
#Snow and ice traction#Wet handling and hydroplaning#Road noise and comfort#Fuel economy and range#Tread wear and longevity#Premium price point#Directional tread design

Based on 762 community posts

Tire B

General Grabber HTS60

Positive

Community opinion of the General Grabber HTS 60 is largely positive, with owners highlighting its low price, quiet road manners, and strong fuel and electric efficiency compared to all-terrain alternatives. While widely praised as an affordable highway tire capable of light towing, some users note concerns regarding winter grip, wet hydroplaning at half tread, and isolated balance or sidewall defect issues.

Top themes
#fuel and EV efficiency#budget-friendly pricing#quiet and smooth ride#highway and road performance#light towing capability#winter and wet traction#treadwear and balance issues

Based on 38 community posts

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Michelin CrossClimate 2 B · General Grabber HTS60
CategoryAll SeasonAll Season
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverSUV and 4x4
Sizes available9239
Rim diameters15″ – 21″15″ – 22″
Tread depth9 - 10/32″10 - 14/32″
UTQG640 B A620 - 680 A A - B
Treadwear warranty60,000 mi—
SidewallBlack Side WallBlack Side Wall - Raised Outline White Lettering
Max pressure50 - 51 psi44 - 80 psi
Sizes in common00

Which one should you actually buy?

Michelin CrossClimate 2

General Grabber HTS60

Winner: Michelin CrossClimate 2 — better snow, dry and wet. It leads or ties in every category we score.

Pick tire A You drive through snowy winters

Michelin CrossClimate 2 scores 91 vs 72 on snow.

Pick tire A You want the most grip on dry roads

Michelin CrossClimate 2 scores 95 vs 77 on dry.

Pick tire A Your priority is wet-weather safety

Michelin CrossClimate 2 scores 87 vs 79 on wet.

Pick tire A You want a quieter cabin

Michelin CrossClimate 2 scores 80 vs 73 on noise.

Tire A · Michelin CrossClimate 2
Tire B · General Grabber HTS60

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

CrossClimate 2 or Grabber HTS60?

Which is better in the wet, CrossClimate 2 or Grabber HTS60?

Michelin CrossClimate 2, 87 vs 79 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, CrossClimate 2 or Grabber HTS60?

Michelin CrossClimate 2, 95 vs 77 on our dry score.

Which is better in snow, CrossClimate 2 or Grabber HTS60?

Michelin CrossClimate 2, 91 vs 72 on our snow score.

Which is quieter, CrossClimate 2 or Grabber HTS60?

Michelin CrossClimate 2, 80 vs 73 on our noise score.

Which is more comfortable, CrossClimate 2 or Grabber HTS60?

Neither, by our numbers: 78 vs 77 on the comfort score, within 3 points.

Which lasts longer, CrossClimate 2 or Grabber HTS60?

Michelin CrossClimate 2, 83 vs 77 on our treadwear score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology