tirewheelguide
Head-to-head Updated

Michelin CrossClimate 2 vs Yokohama Geolandar G900 — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews. Based on 32 + 0 road tests and 21,600 + 14 owner reviews. How we score

CrossClimate 2 is ahead, 85–66

Check price on Amazon · CrossClimate 2 or Geolandar G900 on Amazon
Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Michelin CrossClimate 2
Tire AMichelin

CrossClimate 2

All Season

Tests 86 · 32 tests Owners 82 · 21,600 reviews

Best test result: #1 of 35 in 2023 All Season Tyre 35 Set Shootout (dry braking)

“Installed CrossClimate2 Switched out the OEM tires with a set of CrossClimate on my '23 Grand Cherokee. Loving the increased grip and slightly more aggressive look of these tires. Noise levels did increase a bit for the first few hundred miles but has now improved. There was about a 2 - 3mpg drop after installation. Not sure if it's really the tires or use of Winter gas and drop of temperature right around the same time I got these tires. Overall fully satisfied and would definitely purchase again!”

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 92

    Dry

    CrossClimate 2 +24
    68
    Why this score
    SourceCrossClimate 2Geolandar G900
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 30 / – tests98≈ 68 (est.)
    Reviews found online8468

    CrossClimate 2: 60% × 98.1 + 40% × 83.8 = 92

    Geolandar G900: 60% × 67.9 (est.) + 40% × 68.1 = 68

    No road tests of dry for Geolandar G900. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).

  2. 84

    Wet

    CrossClimate 2 +14
    70
    Why this score
    SourceCrossClimate 2Geolandar G900
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 30 / – tests82≈ 70 (est.)
    Reviews found online8671

    CrossClimate 2: 60% × 82.4 + 40% × 86.4 = 84

    Geolandar G900: 60% × 70.3 (est.) + 40% × 70.7 = 70

    No road tests of wet for Geolandar G900. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).

  3. 89

    Snow

    CrossClimate 2 +25
    64
    Why this score
    SourceCrossClimate 2Geolandar G900
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 26 / – tests98≈ 67 (est.)
    Reviews found online7661

    CrossClimate 2: 60% × 97.6 + 40% × 76.2 = 89

    Geolandar G900: 60% × 66.9 (est.) + 40% × 60.8 = 64

    No road tests of snow for Geolandar G900. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.33).

  4. 72

    Comfort

    CrossClimate 2 +7
    65
    Why this score
    SourceCrossClimate 2Geolandar G900
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 3 / – tests65≈ 68 (est.)
    Reviews found online8360

    CrossClimate 2: 60% × 65.1 + 40% × 83 = 72

    Geolandar G900: 60% × 67.6 (est.) + 40% × 60.3 = 65

    No road tests of comfort for Geolandar G900. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.

  5. 79

    Noise

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourceCrossClimate 2Geolandar G900
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 19 / – tests78–
    Reviews found online81–

    CrossClimate 2: 60% × 78.3 + 40% × 80.7 = 79

  6. 80

    Treadwear

    CrossClimate 2 +17
    63
    Why this score
    SourceCrossClimate 2Geolandar G900
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 7 / – tests79≈ 64 (est.)
    Reviews found online8161

    CrossClimate 2: 60% × 78.7 + 40% × 81 = 80

    Geolandar G900: 60% × 64.2 (est.) + 40% × 60.9 = 63

    No road tests of treadwear for Geolandar G900. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).

  7. 80

    Handling (owners)

    CrossClimate 2 +18
    62
    Why this score
    SourceCrossClimate 2Geolandar G900
    Reviews found online8062
Scores at a glance
CategoryMichelin CrossClimate 2Yokohama Geolandar G900
Relative Score 85 66
Dry 92 68
Wet 84 70
Snow 89 64
Comfort 72 65
Noise 79 –
Treadwear 80 63
Handling (owners) 80 62

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score

CrossClimate 2

Geolandar G900

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A CrossClimate 2

Pros

  • Exceptional grip and traction in snow, slush, and winter weather conditions
  • Strong braking and handling performance on dry and wet pavement
  • Long-lasting tread wear and durability

Cons

  • Higher initial purchase price
  • Slight negative impact on fuel economy / EV range for some drivers
  • Potential for increased road noise or harshness as the tires wear down
All owner themes in the CrossClimate 2 review

Tire B Geolandar G900

Pros

  • Excellent all-terrain versatility including snow, gravel, and mud
  • Predictable and secure handling characteristics
  • High level of ride comfort compared to stiffer premium alternatives

Cons

  • Inconsistent tread life with many reports of premature wear
  • High road noise levels, particularly on motorways
  • High price point relative to current market competitors
All owner themes in the Geolandar G900 review

What real owners are saying

From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score

Tire A

Michelin CrossClimate 2

Positive

The community overwhelmingly praises the Michelin CrossClimate 2 for its exceptional snow, ice, and wet-weather traction, often describing it as an ideal all-weather tire. While many drivers report a quiet, comfortable ride and solid durability, some users note potential downsides including reduced fuel or battery efficiency, road noise on certain surfaces, and premium pricing. A few commenters also point out that the tire may be overkill for regions without significant winter weather.

r/tires ·14 upvotes ·2024-01-14

“Michelin Cross climate 2 in winter snowstorm 1/2024 review I had these installed on my 2021 Honda CR-V hybrid AWD back in August from the OEM Hancook tires. The road noise went away after driving about 500 miles. These tires are freaking amazing! Large puddle on the road? No hydroplaning. My MPG didn’t suffer that much (about 0.3-0.5 mpg decrease). Recently got hit by the snowstorm in Michigan and it’s nice having the confidence driving in the bad road conditions. On my way home from work, there were so many accidents with cars in ditches and unable to go up a hill. I had to take backroads and I had no problem traversing through the back dirt roads. There was a hill that a lot of cars weren’t able to get up but I just squeezed past them without any issues. I was amazed how great these tires are. So glad I spent the extra money for these - I hope they last a while before I get another set!”
r/VWiD4Owners ·2 upvotes ·2026-09-11

“CC2 is a super safe way to go, I’d just keep on with them if you’re happy so far. Other options probably won’t last as long or have as good traction in the occasional snow/ice. I have a set of 18” wheels so I use 235/60R18 tires and rotate them, live in the northeast, lots of snow in winter. I’ve used Pirelli Scorpion WeatherActive, they were great, lasted a bit over 40k miles until they got down to just over 2/16th. I’m on Bridgestone UltraWeather now, feel fantastic so far, slightly better efficiency than WeatherActives, slightly quieter too. They’re basically a next gen version of WeatherPeak but in an XL load rating which the ID.4 specifies.”
r/crv ·53 upvotes ·2023-06-23

“Review of Michelin CrossClimate 2 tires. I recently purchased Michelin CrossClimate 2 tires for my wife’s 2018 CRV EX-L FWD and I have to say they are pretty stellar. Thus far we have put at least 2000 miles on them to include a 14 hour road trip. Excellent traction on wet roads and far superior to the Goodyear Assurance we had before. We have driven through a couple significant downpours and these tires have confidence on wet roads. As for the alleged noise complaints, I think they’re very quiet compared to the old tires. Rolling resistance/ MPG; no changes and I would have happily sacrificed a couple MPG for good traction in FWD vehicle. As for snow, I can’t say and we live in Texas anyway. Price; I spent about $1000 total for four tires and installs at Costco. That was with tax. Overall, I highly recommend these tires thus far.”
Top themes
#Snow and ice traction#Wet handling and hydroplaning#Road noise and comfort#Fuel economy and range#Tread wear and longevity#Premium price point#Directional tread design

Based on 762 community posts

Tire B

Yokohama Geolandar G900

We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Michelin CrossClimate 2 B · Yokohama Geolandar G900
CategoryAll SeasonWinter
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover
Sizes available922
Rim diameters15″ – 21″16″ – 17″
Tread depth9 - 10/32″—
UTQG640 B A—
Treadwear warranty60,000 mi—
SidewallBlack Side Wall—
Max pressure50 - 51 psi—

Which one should you actually buy?

Michelin CrossClimate 2

Yokohama Geolandar G900

Winner: Michelin CrossClimate 2 — better snow, dry and handling. It leads or ties in every category we score. Yokohama Geolandar G900 rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 14 reviews), so read this result as provisional.

Pick tire A You drive through snowy winters

Michelin CrossClimate 2 scores 89 vs 64 on snow.

Pick tire A You want the most grip on dry roads

Michelin CrossClimate 2 scores 92 vs 68 on dry.

Pick tire A You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Michelin CrossClimate 2 scores 80 vs 62 on handling.

Pick tire A You want the longest tread life

Michelin CrossClimate 2 scores 80 vs 63 on treadwear.

Tire A · Michelin CrossClimate 2
Check price on Amazon
Tire B · Yokohama Geolandar G900
Check price on Amazon

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

CrossClimate 2 or Geolandar G900?

Which is better in the wet, CrossClimate 2 or Geolandar G900?

Michelin CrossClimate 2, 84 vs 70 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, CrossClimate 2 or Geolandar G900?

Michelin CrossClimate 2, 92 vs 68 on our dry score.

Which is better in snow, CrossClimate 2 or Geolandar G900?

Michelin CrossClimate 2, 89 vs 64 on our snow score.

Which is more comfortable, CrossClimate 2 or Geolandar G900?

Michelin CrossClimate 2, 72 vs 65 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, CrossClimate 2 or Geolandar G900?

Michelin CrossClimate 2, 80 vs 63 on our treadwear score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology