Tests – · none yet Owners 44 · 10 reviews
Michelin Energy Saver A/S vs Michelin Pilot Sport All Season 4 — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 3 road tests and 10 + 5,009 owner reviews. How we score
Pilot Sport All Season 4 is ahead, 79–52
Add your size for an exact match
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests 77 · 3 tests Owners 80 · 5,009 reviews
Best test result: #1 of 9 in 2024 Tire Rack UHP All Season Tyre Test (snow braking)
“I just switched from the Pilot Sport All Season 4 to the Continental DWS 06 Plus, and the contis are WAY quieter and ride so much smoother than the Michelins. Hopefully they'll last longer too, the Michelins only lasted me about 28k~ miles despite regularly rotating them.”
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
52
Dry
Pilot Sport All Season 4 +3183Why this score
Source Energy Saver A/S Pilot Sport All Season 4 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 3 tests ≈ 58 (est.) 79 Reviews found online 44 89 Energy Saver A/S: 60% × 57.9 (est.) + 40% × 43.7 = 52
Pilot Sport All Season 4: 60% × 78.6 + 40% × 88.8 = 83
No road tests of dry for Energy Saver A/S. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).
-
51
Wet
Pilot Sport All Season 4 +3384Why this score
Source Energy Saver A/S Pilot Sport All Season 4 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 3 tests ≈ 56 (est.) 81 Reviews found online 43 90 Energy Saver A/S: 60% × 55.6 (est.) + 40% × 43.2 = 51
Pilot Sport All Season 4: 60% × 81.2 + 40% × 89.5 = 84
No road tests of wet for Energy Saver A/S. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
-
55
Snow
Pilot Sport All Season 4 +2176Why this score
Source Energy Saver A/S Pilot Sport All Season 4 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests ≈ 62 (est.) 84 Reviews found online 44 64 Energy Saver A/S: 60% × 62 (est.) + 40% × 43.6 = 55
Pilot Sport All Season 4: 60% × 84.4 + 40% × 64.3 = 76
No road tests of snow for Energy Saver A/S. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).
-
52
Comfort
Pilot Sport All Season 4 +2173Why this score
Source Energy Saver A/S Pilot Sport All Season 4 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 3 tests ≈ 64 (est.) 69 Reviews found online 45 77 Energy Saver A/S: 40% × 63.9 (est.) + 60% × 44.9 = 52
Pilot Sport All Season 4: 40% × 68.8 + 60% × 76.5 = 73
No road tests of comfort for Energy Saver A/S. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.21).
-
–
Noise
No comparison64Why this score
Source Energy Saver A/S Pilot Sport All Season 4 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 3 tests – 55 Reviews found online – 79 Pilot Sport All Season 4: 60% × 54.9 + 40% × 78.8 = 64
-
53
Treadwear
Pilot Sport All Season 4 +1770Why this score
Source Energy Saver A/S Pilot Sport All Season 4 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 59 (est.) ≈ 68 (est.) Reviews found online 45 72 Energy Saver A/S: 60% × 58.8 (est.) + 40% × 44.9 = 53
Pilot Sport All Season 4: 60% × 68.5 (est.) + 40% × 72 = 70
No road tests of treadwear for Energy Saver A/S. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
No road tests of treadwear for Pilot Sport All Season 4. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
-
45
Handling (owners)
Pilot Sport All Season 4 +3782Why this score
Source Energy Saver A/S Pilot Sport All Season 4 Reviews found online 45 82
Scores at a glance
| Category | Michelin Energy Saver A/S | Michelin Pilot Sport All Season 4 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 52 | 79 |
| Dry | 52 | 83 |
| Wet | 51 | 84 |
| Snow | 55 | 76 |
| Comfort | 52 | 73 |
| Noise | – | 64 |
| Treadwear | 53 | 70 |
| Handling (owners) | 45 | 82 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Energy Saver A/S
Pilot Sport All Season 4
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A Energy Saver A/S
Pros
- High fuel economy and rolling efficiency
- Potential for high mileage in specific driving conditions
- Reliable dry weather traction for some users
Cons
- Significant hydroplaning tendencies in wet conditions
- Inconsistent tread life, with reports of premature wear
- Excessive road noise and audible squealing during cornering
Tire B Pilot Sport All Season 4
Pros
- Exceptional grip and confidence in both wet and dry weather conditions
- Noticeable improvement in ride comfort, responsiveness, and smoothness compared to OEM run-flat tires
- Strong braking performance and resistance to hydroplaning in heavy rain
Cons
- Faster-than-expected treadwear, particularly on performance vehicles or staggered setups
- Noticeable road noise, humming, or cavity resonance at highway speeds for some users
- Firm sidewalls can transmit sharper impacts over rough roads and potholes
What real owners are saying
From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score
Michelin Energy Saver A/S
We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.
Michelin Pilot Sport All Season 4
Community sentiment for the Michelin Pilot Sport All Season 4 is predominantly positive, with drivers praising its dry and wet grip, responsive handling, and substantial upgrade over stock tires. However, several users report drawbacks including mediocre deep snow performance, noticeable road noise or ride stiffness compared to competitors like the Continental DWS 06 Plus, and an efficiency or range penalty on electric vehicles.
“I ran the Continental DWS (Dry Wet Snow) all year round on the 221 S-65. They were very quiet on nice roads... Lots of grip when being a savage on dry, wet, even in the snow. Only time I got stuck in snow was by high centering the car on the snow drift that formed across the driveway every time we had a Nor-Easter. They would make it to 20,000 miles generally. I have given the 222 S65 Michelin Pilot Sport AS4. Less grip in dry hot conditions. They will live to just under 20,000. Zero opportunity to try them in snow (live in the desert now). They make more noise than Conti. Have not got much time with them in the rain. They will get replaced with a tire more fitting here in the desert. Run flat tires will thud over every bump. Best way to avoid wheel damage is keeping 45lbs of air in the tires and avoid roads with pot holes.”
“I just replaced my Michelin Pilot Sport AS4 that I had on my Impreza with the Michelin CC2s. I got 30k out of the PSAS4 tires, and neither the tire shop nor Michelin would honor the 45k warranty, even with regular rotations and even wear. I was not impressed with them in the snow, and I've had about 30 winters of driving with different all seasons. The CC2, on the other hand, were incredible. Such a good tire in my first winter that I bought a set for my daughter's Forester. A little noisier than the PSAS4s, but I'll take superior handling on ice/snow over the quieter tire.”
“I got 30k miles out of the pilot sport 4s and pilot sport all season 4. The cost difference was not too bad and the all season 4 grip almost as well and are rated to 11f vs 40f for the pilot sport 4s. And they all wore evenly. Upsizing definitely made it feel more planted 245 275.”
Based on 241 community posts
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Michelin Energy Saver A/S | B · Michelin Pilot Sport All Season 4 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | All Season | All Season |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | — | 3 |
| Rim diameters | — | 20″ |
| Tread depth | — | 9 - 10/32″ |
| UTQG | 480 A - B A - B | 440 - 540 A - AA A |
| Sidewall | — | Black Side Wall |
| Max pressure | — | 50 - 51 psi |
Which one should you actually buy?
Michelin Energy Saver A/S
Michelin Pilot Sport All Season 4
Winner: Michelin Pilot Sport All Season 4 — better handling, wet and dry. It leads or ties in every category we score. Michelin Energy Saver A/S rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 10 reviews), so read this result as provisional.
Michelin Pilot Sport All Season 4 scores 82 vs 45 on handling.
Michelin Pilot Sport All Season 4 scores 84 vs 51 on wet.
Michelin Pilot Sport All Season 4 scores 83 vs 52 on dry.
Michelin Pilot Sport All Season 4 scores 76 vs 55 on snow.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Energy Saver A/S or Pilot Sport All Season 4?
Which is better in the wet, Energy Saver A/S or Pilot Sport All Season 4?
Michelin Pilot Sport All Season 4, 84 vs 51 on our wet score.
Which grips better on dry roads, Energy Saver A/S or Pilot Sport All Season 4?
Michelin Pilot Sport All Season 4, 83 vs 52 on our dry score.
Which is better in snow, Energy Saver A/S or Pilot Sport All Season 4?
Michelin Pilot Sport All Season 4, 76 vs 55 on our snow score.
Which is more comfortable, Energy Saver A/S or Pilot Sport All Season 4?
Michelin Pilot Sport All Season 4, 73 vs 52 on our comfort score.
Which lasts longer, Energy Saver A/S or Pilot Sport All Season 4?
Michelin Pilot Sport All Season 4, 70 vs 53 on our treadwear score.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology