Tests – · none yet Owners 57 · 42 reviews
Head-to-head
Updated
Michelin Energy vs Nexen N Fera SU4 — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews. Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 42 + 80 owner reviews. How we score
N Fera SU4 is ahead, 75–60
Add your size for an exact match
/R
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests – · none yet Owners 77 · 80 reviews
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
55
Dry
N Fera SU4 +2176Why this score
Source Energy N Fera SU4 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 60 (est.) ≈ 73 (est.) Reviews found online 48 80 Energy: 60% × 60 (est.) + 40% × 48.4 = 55
N Fera SU4: 60% × 72.6 (est.) + 40% × 79.9 = 76
No road tests of dry for Energy. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).
No road tests of dry for N Fera SU4. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).
-
61
Wet
N Fera SU4 +1677Why this score
Source Energy N Fera SU4 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 63 (est.) ≈ 75 (est.) Reviews found online 57 80 Energy: 60% × 62.9 (est.) + 40% × 57.4 = 61
N Fera SU4: 60% × 75.5 (est.) + 40% × 79.9 = 77
No road tests of wet for Energy. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).
No road tests of wet for N Fera SU4. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).
-
65
Comfort
N Fera SU4 +873Why this score
Source Energy N Fera SU4 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 68 (est.) ≈ 70 (est.) Reviews found online 60 77 Energy: 60% × 67.6 (est.) + 40% × 60.2 = 65
N Fera SU4: 60% × 70.5 (est.) + 40% × 76.8 = 73
No road tests of comfort for Energy or N Fera SU4. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
67
Treadwear
N Fera SU4 +168Why this score
Source Energy N Fera SU4 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 66 (est.) ≈ 67 (est.) Reviews found online 67 70 Energy: 60% × 66.1 (est.) + 40% × 67.3 = 67
N Fera SU4: 60% × 66.9 (est.) + 40% × 69.8 = 68
No road tests of treadwear for Energy. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).
No road tests of treadwear for N Fera SU4. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).
-
51
Handling (owners)
N Fera SU4 +2576Why this score
Source Energy N Fera SU4 Reviews found online 51 76
Scores at a glance
| Category | Michelin Energy | Nexen N Fera SU4 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 60 | 75 |
| Dry | 55 | 76 |
| Wet | 61 | 77 |
| Comfort | 65 | 73 |
| Treadwear | 67 | 68 |
| Handling (owners) | 51 | 76 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score
60
/ 100
Energy
75
/ 100
N Fera SU4
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A Energy
Pros
- Exceptional tread life and durability
- Noticeable improvements in fuel economy
- Low road noise and comfortable ride quality
Cons
- Lack of steering feedback and road feel
- Inconsistent or poor grip in wet conditions
- High price point relative to competitors
Tire B N Fera SU4
Pros
- Outstanding value for money compared to major premium brands
- High level of ride comfort and low road noise
- Reliable and predictable grip in both dry and wet conditions
Cons
- Softer sidewalls can lead to less precise steering feedback and body roll during aggressive cornering
- Average or faster-than-expected treadwear for some driving styles
- Can become harder and noisier as the tire ages or wears down
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Michelin Energy | B · Nexen N Fera SU4 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer | Summer |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
Which one should you actually buy?
60
/ 100
Michelin Energy
75
/ 100
Nexen N Fera SU4
Winner: Nexen N Fera SU4 — better handling, dry and wet. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Pick tire B
You enjoy sharp, responsive handling
Nexen N Fera SU4 scores 76 vs 51 on handling.
Pick tire B
You want the most grip on dry roads
Nexen N Fera SU4 scores 76 vs 55 on dry.
Pick tire B
Your priority is wet-weather safety
Nexen N Fera SU4 scores 77 vs 61 on wet.
Pick tire B
You want the most comfortable ride
Nexen N Fera SU4 scores 73 vs 65 on comfort.
Tire A · Michelin Energy
Tire B · Nexen N Fera SU4
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Energy or N Fera SU4?
Which is better in the wet, Energy or N Fera SU4?
Nexen N Fera SU4, 77 vs 61 on our wet score.
Which grips better on dry roads, Energy or N Fera SU4?
Nexen N Fera SU4, 76 vs 55 on our dry score.
Which is more comfortable, Energy or N Fera SU4?
Nexen N Fera SU4, 73 vs 65 on our comfort score.
Which lasts longer, Energy or N Fera SU4?
Neither, by our numbers: 67 vs 68 on the treadwear score, within 3 points.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology