Head-to-head Updated

Michelin Latitude Alpin 2 vs Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 2 + 4 road tests and 6 + 2,588 owner reviews. How we score

CrossClimate 2 SUV is ahead, 83–76

Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Michelin Latitude Alpin 2
Tire AMichelin

Latitude Alpin 2

Winter

± 7

Tests 71 · 2 tests Owners 84 · 6 reviews

Best test result: #1 of 10 in 2018 Auto Bild Winter SUV / 4x4 Tyre Test (noise)

Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV
Tire BMichelin

CrossClimate 2 SUV

All Season

± 5

Tests 87 · 4 tests Owners 83 · 2,588 reviews

Best test result: #1 of 10 in 2023 SUV All Season Tyre Test (dry braking)

“Opinions please ... Michelin Primacy 4+ vs Michelin Cross Climate 2 SUV? Hi all ... I'm coming up to tyre replacement time so I've looking at what's around. Currently on Bridgestone Turanzas cos that's what came with the car, but I'm not hugely impressed with their lifespan, they seem to pick up sidewall damage easily and the tread seems to age quickly. Which is not much cop when all i do is commute round Southern England. I've pretty much settled on Michelin Primacy 4+ or Cross Climate 2 SUV but I'm having difficulty making a final decision. So I thought the hivemind might settle this: in your experience which one is best for lifespan and fuel consumption? Car is a 2018 SEAT Ateca with 18" alloys. Edit: well guys, I went with the Cross Climates, thanks for the advice!”

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 67

    Dry

    CrossClimate 2 SUV +20
    87
    Why this score
    SourceLatitude Alpin 2CrossClimate 2 SUV
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 2 / 4 tests5986
    Reviews found online8088

    Latitude Alpin 2: 60% × 58.8 + 40% × 79.9 = 67

    CrossClimate 2 SUV: 60% × 85.9 + 40% × 88.2 = 87

  2. 81

    Wet

    CrossClimate 2 SUV +3
    84
    Why this score
    SourceLatitude Alpin 2CrossClimate 2 SUV
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 2 / 4 tests7684
    Reviews found online9085

    Latitude Alpin 2: 60% × 75.7 + 40% × 90.2 = 81

    CrossClimate 2 SUV: 60% × 84 + 40% × 84.7 = 84

  3. 78

    Snow

    CrossClimate 2 SUV +12
    90
    Why this score
    SourceLatitude Alpin 2CrossClimate 2 SUV
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 2 / 4 tests7697
    Reviews found online8180

    Latitude Alpin 2: 60% × 75.8 + 40% × 80.6 = 78

    CrossClimate 2 SUV: 60% × 97.3 + 40% × 80.1 = 90

  4. 78

    Comfort

    CrossClimate 2 SUV +7
    85
    Why this score
    SourceLatitude Alpin 2CrossClimate 2 SUV
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 2 tests≈ 72 (est.)81
    Reviews found online8388

    Latitude Alpin 2: 40% × 71.6 (est.) + 60% × 82.5 = 78

    CrossClimate 2 SUV: 40% × 81 + 60% × 87.6 = 85

    No road tests of comfort for Latitude Alpin 2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).

  5. 72

    Noise

    CrossClimate 2 SUV +4
    76
    Why this score
    SourceLatitude Alpin 2CrossClimate 2 SUV
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 2 / 4 tests7682
    Reviews found online≈ 66 (est.)≈ 66 (est.)

    Latitude Alpin 2: 60% × 76.3 + 40% × 66.3 (est.) = 72

    CrossClimate 2 SUV: 60% × 81.7 + 40% × 66.3 (est.) = 76

    No owner ratings of noise for Latitude Alpin 2 or CrossClimate 2 SUV. The owner half is the owners’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests, so the tests say nothing about how owners would rate it.

  6. 77

    Treadwear

    Latitude Alpin 2 +7
    70
    Why this score
    SourceLatitude Alpin 2CrossClimate 2 SUV
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 73 (est.)≈ 69 (est.)
    Reviews found online8473

    Latitude Alpin 2: 60% × 72.7 (est.) + 40% × 83.8 = 77

    CrossClimate 2 SUV: 60% × 68.8 (est.) + 40% × 72.8 = 70

    No road tests of treadwear for Latitude Alpin 2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).

    No road tests of treadwear for CrossClimate 2 SUV. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).

  7. 86

    Handling (owners)

    CrossClimate 2 SUV +3
    89
    Why this score
    SourceLatitude Alpin 2CrossClimate 2 SUV
    Reviews found online8689
  8. 59

    Efficiency

    CrossClimate 2 SUV +28
    87
    Why this score
    SourceLatitude Alpin 2CrossClimate 2 SUV
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 2 / 3 tests5987
Scores at a glance
Michelin Latitude Alpin 2 vs Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryMichelin Latitude Alpin 2Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV
Relative Score 76 83
Dry 67 87
Wet 81 84
Snow 78 90
Comfort 78 85
Noise 72 76
Treadwear 77 70
Handling (owners) 86 89
Efficiency 59 87

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Not important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score
± 7

Latitude Alpin 2

± 5

CrossClimate 2 SUV

The professional test results behind the scores

Per discipline: the average % of the best tire over every test both tires were in, and how many of those tests each one won. “Different tests” rows compare results from separate tests.

DisciplineCategoryLatitude Alpin 2CrossClimate 2 SUVΔHead-to-head
Dry Braking Dry 90% #9/10 · 2018 Auto Bild Winter SUV / 4x4 Tyre Test 100% #1/7 · 2025 Quattroruote All-Season Tire Test R19 – Different tests
Dry Handling Dry 98% #9/10 · 2018 Auto Bild Winter SUV / 4x4 Tyre Test 83% #6/9 · 2025 ACE/ARBÖ/GTÜ All-Season Tire Test R17 – Different tests
Straight Aquaplaning Wet 96% #3/10 · 2018 Auto Bild Winter SUV / 4x4 Tyre Test 100% #1/7 · 2025 Quattroruote All-Season Tire Test R19 – Different tests
Wet Braking Wet 98% #6/10 · 2018 Auto Bild Winter SUV / 4x4 Tyre Test 99% #3/7 · 2025 Quattroruote All-Season Tire Test R19 – Different tests
Wet Handling Wet 98% #6/10 · 2018 Auto Bild Winter SUV / 4x4 Tyre Test 83% #6/9 · 2025 ACE/ARBÖ/GTÜ All-Season Tire Test R17 – Different tests
Snow Braking Snow 95% #4/10 · 2018 Auto Bild Winter SUV / 4x4 Tyre Test 100% #1/7 · 2025 Quattroruote All-Season Tire Test R19 – Different tests
Snow Handling Snow 98% #2/10 · 2018 Auto Bild Winter SUV / 4x4 Tyre Test 100% #1/9 · 2025 ACE/ARBÖ/GTÜ All-Season Tire Test R17 – Different tests
Noise Noise 100% #1/10 · 2018 Auto Bild Winter SUV / 4x4 Tyre Test 100% #3/9 · 2024 Motor SUV All Season Tyre Test – Different tests
Rolling Resistance Efficiency 87% #9/10 · 2018 Auto Bild Winter SUV / 4x4 Tyre Test 90% #2/9 · 2025 ACE/ARBÖ/GTÜ All-Season Tire Test R17 – Different tests
Also published by the testers (not in the score)
Overall Ranking Overall #7/10 2018 Auto Bild Winter SUV / 4x4 Tyre Test #1/7 2025 Quattroruote All-Season Tire Test R19 – Different tests

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Latitude Alpin 2

Pros

  • Exceptional grip and confidence in deep snow, slush, and icy conditions.
  • Impressive tread life and durability over long-term usage.
  • Consistent, safe performance across a wide variety of winter weather scenarios.

Cons

  • Slightly less responsive handling on dry, cold roads compared to specialized dry-weather winter tires.
  • Premium pricing typical of the Michelin brand.
  • Performance is optimized for winter, which may feel less sharp in mild, dry conditions.
All owner themes in the Latitude Alpin 2 review

Tire B CrossClimate 2 SUV

Pros

  • Exceptional wet, ice, and snow traction that inspires winter-weather driving confidence
  • Significantly improved ride comfort and impact absorption over road imperfections
  • Impressive tread life and durability yielding long-term value

Cons

  • Higher initial purchase price compared to competitors
  • Minor fuel economy or range drop reported by some users, especially on hybrids and EVs
  • Occasional low-pitched or increased road noise at highway speeds (between 50-70 MPH)
All owner themes in the CrossClimate 2 SUV review

What real owners are saying

From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score

Tire A

Michelin Latitude Alpin 2

We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.

Tire B

Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV

Positive

Community members generally view the Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV as a premium, dependable tire known for strong snow and dry performance, comfortable driving feel, and valuable 3PMS certification. Discussions frequently center around sizing availability, comparison to other models like the Primacy or standard CrossClimate 2, and choosing between specific speed or OEM ratings.

mbworld.org

“So here's the latest on Tires recommendations: (still dithering). Looking for smooth, soft ride, good mileage. I do have a mountain home; use ~30ish days during winter ski season, but mostly highway driving in Southern California ( don't disparage me for being a Californian. I cant stand the people or the government too lol. But it's a beautiful state). 2020 300GLC 4MATIC California car, 235/60 18H rating What will it be...?????? MICHELIN DEFENDER LTX M/S - seems like you guys are in favor. But hard to get. And the size is a 235/60 106T designation. Is the T speed max of 116mph not safe enough when OEM was an H rating 130mph? MICHELIN DEFENDER2. $238. Tire rack MICHELIN CrossClimate2 SUV tire rack $248. - hearing both good and bad. I heard they're soft and mileage tanks. Check out reviews on the Michelin USA official site. Pretty interesting. CONTINENTAL CROSSCONTACT LX25 $222. tire rack high rating? Also just got this from TireRack customer service CONTINENTAL EXTREMECONTACT DWS 06 PLUS. $238. Not sure, seems like TR is trying to promote them for Cont.”

chrforums.uk ·2 upvotes ·2024-06-04

“I have the Michelin Cross Climate 2 SUV tyres . The many reviews I read approved of their performance in snowy conditions (if that is an issue where you live) and also their dry condition performance. They supposedly have a decent life span. They felt nicer to drive on than the Primacy tyres . They weren't cheap at about £170 each fitted but will give me some insurance about snowy conditions and will hopefully last until I swap the car in about 3 years.”

r/tires ·2 upvotes ·2025-07-10

“CrossClimate 2 SUV not offered in 245/60R18, what would be the closest alternative? I'm trying to buy the best tires for a family SUV (Ford Edge) driving in south-east USA. Being able to drive in very wet conditions (hydroplaning resistance) safely and comfort/quiet are high priorities. Ice/general handling are also important to me but less high-prio since we don't get a lot of snow and it's a family SUV that is mostly not driven spirited. Treadwear/Cost is lowest priority, I just want the safest option, but ideally it wouldn't wear out too fast, at least 40-50k miles if that's reasonable. I can't find any CrossClimate 2 SUV sets in this size and those would be my first choice. Is it better to just get regular CrossClimate 2's in that size or should I get the SUV oriented Pirelli Scorpion WeatherActive (this is what Tirerack is recommending me to get)? I've come to realize the CrossClimate 3's wont be here in time before the tires become too unsafe to drive on, which is extremely unfortunate timing.”

Top themes
#snow and dry performance#speed and OEM ratings#tire size availability#comfort and driving feel#comparison with Primacy#SUV versus standard version

Based on 8 community posts

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Michelin Latitude Alpin 2 B · Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV
CategoryWinterAll Season
Vehicle typeSUV and 4x4SUV and 4x4
Sizes available—35
Rim diameters—17″ – 22″

Which one should you actually buy?

Michelin Latitude Alpin 2

Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV

Winner: Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV — better efficiency, dry and snow. Pick the Michelin Latitude Alpin 2 if treadwear matters most to you.

Pick tire B You want lower fuel or energy use

Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV scores 87 vs 59 on efficiency.

Pick tire B You want the most grip on dry roads

Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV scores 87 vs 67 on dry.

Pick tire B You drive through snowy winters

Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV scores 90 vs 78 on snow.

Pick tire A You want the longest tread life

Michelin Latitude Alpin 2 scores 77 vs 70 on treadwear.

Tire A · Michelin Latitude Alpin 2
Tire B · Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Latitude Alpin 2 or CrossClimate 2 SUV?

Which is better in the wet, Latitude Alpin 2 or CrossClimate 2 SUV?

Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV, 84 vs 81 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, Latitude Alpin 2 or CrossClimate 2 SUV?

Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV, 87 vs 67 on our dry score.

Which is better in snow, Latitude Alpin 2 or CrossClimate 2 SUV?

Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV, 90 vs 78 on our snow score.

Which is quieter, Latitude Alpin 2 or CrossClimate 2 SUV?

Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV, 76 vs 72 on our noise score.

Which is more comfortable, Latitude Alpin 2 or CrossClimate 2 SUV?

Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV, 85 vs 78 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, Latitude Alpin 2 or CrossClimate 2 SUV?

Michelin Latitude Alpin 2, 77 vs 70 on our treadwear score.

Which rolls more easily, Latitude Alpin 2 or CrossClimate 2 SUV?

Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV, 87 vs 59 on our efficiency score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology