tirewheelguide

Michelin Latitude Diamaris looks discontinued: no new owner reviews or road tests in five years and no current EU tyre label.

Head-to-head Updated

Michelin Latitude Diamaris vs Continental ContiCrossContact LX 2 — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 5 + 28 owner reviews. How we score

Too close to call: Latitude Diamaris and ContiCrossContact LX 2 are level at 70.

Check price on Amazon · Latitude Diamaris Check price on Amazon · ContiCrossContact LX 2
Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 72

    Dry

    Latitude Diamaris +3
    69
    Why this score
    SourceLatitude DiamarisContiCrossContact LX 2
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 70 (est.)≈ 69 (est.)
    Reviews found online7469

    Latitude Diamaris: 60% × 70.5 (est.) + 40% × 73.7 = 72

    ContiCrossContact LX 2: 60% × 68.6 (est.) + 40% × 69.4 = 69

    No road tests of dry for Latitude Diamaris. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).

    No road tests of dry for ContiCrossContact LX 2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).

  2. 70

    Wet

    ContiCrossContact LX 2 +2
    72
    Why this score
    SourceLatitude DiamarisContiCrossContact LX 2
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 70 (est.)≈ 71 (est.)
    Reviews found online7072

    Latitude Diamaris: 60% × 70.2 (est.) + 40% × 69.8 = 70

    ContiCrossContact LX 2: 60% × 71.4 (est.) + 40% × 71.9 = 72

    No road tests of wet for Latitude Diamaris. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

    No road tests of wet for ContiCrossContact LX 2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

  3. –

    Snow

    No comparison
    61
    Why this score
    SourceLatitude DiamarisContiCrossContact LX 2
    Professional tests (TWG score)–≈ 65 (est.)
    Reviews found online–54

    ContiCrossContact LX 2: 60% × 64.6 (est.) + 40% × 54.4 = 61

    No road tests of snow for ContiCrossContact LX 2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.37).

  4. 69

    Comfort

    Latitude Diamaris +3
    66
    Why this score
    SourceLatitude DiamarisContiCrossContact LX 2
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 69 (est.)≈ 68 (est.)
    Reviews found online6965

    Latitude Diamaris: 40% × 69 (est.) + 60% × 68.6 = 69

    ContiCrossContact LX 2: 40% × 68.4 (est.) + 60% × 65.1 = 66

    No road tests of comfort for Latitude Diamaris or ContiCrossContact LX 2. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.

  5. 68

    Treadwear

    ContiCrossContact LX 2 +3
    71
    Why this score
    SourceLatitude DiamarisContiCrossContact LX 2
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 67 (est.)≈ 69 (est.)
    Reviews found online6974

    Latitude Diamaris: 60% × 67.3 (est.) + 40% × 69.4 = 68

    ContiCrossContact LX 2: 60% × 68.9 (est.) + 40% × 74.1 = 71

    No road tests of treadwear for Latitude Diamaris. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).

    No road tests of treadwear for ContiCrossContact LX 2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).

  6. 68

    Handling (owners)

    ContiCrossContact LX 2 +2
    70
    Why this score
    SourceLatitude DiamarisContiCrossContact LX 2
    Reviews found online6870
Scores at a glance
CategoryMichelin Latitude DiamarisContinental ContiCrossContact LX 2
Relative Score 70 70
Dry 72 69
Wet 70 72
Snow – 61
Comfort 69 66
Treadwear 68 71
Handling (owners) 68 70

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score
± 8

Latitude Diamaris

± 8

ContiCrossContact LX 2

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Latitude Diamaris

Pros

  • Exceptional tread life with many users reporting 40,000+ miles
  • High fuel efficiency compared to newer successor models
  • Strong dry-weather grip and handling feedback

Cons

  • Inconsistent wet-weather performance and susceptibility to hydroplaning
  • Poor traction in snow and icy conditions
  • High initial purchase price
All owner themes in the Latitude Diamaris review

Tire B ContiCrossContact LX 2

Pros

  • Exceptional tread life and long-term durability
  • Strong wet and dry road grip and braking performance
  • Good capability for light off-roading, gravel, and sand

Cons

  • Poor traction and handling in deep snow, ice, or heavy mud
  • Can exhibit loud road noise and a harsh ride on rough or damaged roads
  • Cornering precision can feel reduced at higher speeds
All owner themes in the ContiCrossContact LX 2 review

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Michelin Latitude Diamaris B · Continental ContiCrossContact LX 2
CategorySummerAll Season
Vehicle typeSUV and 4x4SUV and 4x4
Sizes available—39
Rim diameters—15″ – 20″

Which one should you actually buy?

Michelin Latitude Diamaris

Continental ContiCrossContact LX 2

Too close to call: Michelin Latitude Diamaris and Continental ContiCrossContact LX 2 are within 2 points overall. Michelin Latitude Diamaris is stronger on dry and comfort. Continental ContiCrossContact LX 2 is stronger on treadwear. Michelin Latitude Diamaris rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 5 reviews), so read this result as provisional.

Pick tire A You want the most grip on dry roads

Michelin Latitude Diamaris scores 72 vs 69 on dry.

Pick tire A You want the most comfortable ride

Michelin Latitude Diamaris scores 69 vs 66 on comfort.

Pick tire B You want the longest tread life

Continental ContiCrossContact LX 2 scores 71 vs 68 on treadwear.

Tire A · Michelin Latitude Diamaris
Check price on Amazon
Tire B · Continental ContiCrossContact LX 2
Check price on Amazon

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Latitude Diamaris or ContiCrossContact LX 2?

Which is better in the wet, Latitude Diamaris or ContiCrossContact LX 2?

Neither, by our numbers: 70 vs 72 on the wet score, within 3 points.

Which grips better on dry roads, Latitude Diamaris or ContiCrossContact LX 2?

Michelin Latitude Diamaris, 72 vs 69 on our dry score.

Which is more comfortable, Latitude Diamaris or ContiCrossContact LX 2?

Michelin Latitude Diamaris, 69 vs 66 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, Latitude Diamaris or ContiCrossContact LX 2?

Continental ContiCrossContact LX 2, 71 vs 68 on our treadwear score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology