Tests – · none yet Owners 52 · 33 reviews
Michelin Latitude Tour HP vs Nexen N'Fera RU1 — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 3 road tests and 33 + 28 owner reviews. How we score
N'Fera RU1 is ahead, 65–57
Add your size for an exact match
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests 61 · 3 tests Owners 67 · 28 reviews
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
57
Dry
N'Fera RU1 +259Why this score
Source Latitude Tour HP N'Fera RU1 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 3 tests ≈ 61 (est.) 54 Reviews found online 51 66 Latitude Tour HP: 60% × 61 (est.) + 40% × 51.2 = 57
N'Fera RU1: 60% × 54.2 + 40% × 66.1 = 59
No road tests of dry for Latitude Tour HP. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).
-
58
Wet
N'Fera RU1 +1068Why this score
Source Latitude Tour HP N'Fera RU1 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 3 tests ≈ 61 (est.) 67 Reviews found online 54 70 Latitude Tour HP: 60% × 61.5 (est.) + 40% × 53.8 = 58
N'Fera RU1: 60% × 67.1 + 40% × 70.3 = 68
No road tests of wet for Latitude Tour HP. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
-
59
Snow
N'Fera RU1 +968Why this score
Source Latitude Tour HP N'Fera RU1 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 64 (est.) ≈ 69 (est.) Reviews found online 51 66 Latitude Tour HP: 60% × 64.4 (est.) + 40% × 51.4 = 59
N'Fera RU1: 60% × 69 (est.) + 40% × 65.7 = 68
No road tests of snow for Latitude Tour HP. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).
No road tests of snow for N'Fera RU1. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).
-
59
Comfort
N'Fera RU1 +665Why this score
Source Latitude Tour HP N'Fera RU1 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 66 (est.) ≈ 68 (est.) Reviews found online 54 63 Latitude Tour HP: 40% × 66.1 (est.) + 60% × 53.8 = 59
N'Fera RU1: 40% × 67.9 (est.) + 60% × 63.4 = 65
No road tests of comfort for Latitude Tour HP or N'Fera RU1. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
–
Noise
No comparison68Why this score
Source Latitude Tour HP N'Fera RU1 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests – 67 Reviews found online – 68 N'Fera RU1: 60% × 67.3 + 40% × 67.9 = 68
-
56
Treadwear
N'Fera RU1 +1167Why this score
Source Latitude Tour HP N'Fera RU1 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 61 (est.) ≈ 67 (est.) Reviews found online 50 67 Latitude Tour HP: 60% × 60.7 (est.) + 40% × 49.8 = 56
N'Fera RU1: 60% × 66.9 (est.) + 40% × 67.4 = 67
No road tests of treadwear for Latitude Tour HP. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).
No road tests of treadwear for N'Fera RU1. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).
-
49
Handling (owners)
N'Fera RU1 +1665Why this score
Source Latitude Tour HP N'Fera RU1 Reviews found online 49 65 -
–
Efficiency
No comparison53Why this score
Source Latitude Tour HP N'Fera RU1 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests – 53
Scores at a glance
| Category | Michelin Latitude Tour HP | Nexen N'Fera RU1 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 57 | 65 |
| Dry | 57 | 59 |
| Wet | 58 | 68 |
| Snow | 59 | 68 |
| Comfort | 59 | 65 |
| Noise | – | 68 |
| Treadwear | 56 | 67 |
| Handling (owners) | 49 | 65 |
| Efficiency | – | 53 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Latitude Tour HP
N'Fera RU1
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
The professional test results behind the scores
Per discipline: the average % of the best tire over every test both tires were in, and how many of those tests each one won. “Different tests” rows compare results from separate tests.
| Discipline | Category | Latitude Tour HP | N'Fera RU1 | Δ | Head-to-head |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Also published by the testers (not in the score) | |||||
| Overall Ranking | Overall | #14/15 2017 ADAC SUV Summer Tyre Test | #8/10 2019 SUV 4x4 Summer Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A Latitude Tour HP
Pros
- Excellent ride comfort and low road noise
- Strong dry-weather handling and steering response
- High durability and longevity for specific vehicle applications
Cons
- Premature sidewall cracking and deterioration
- Inconsistent tread life across different vehicle models
- Poor traction and predictability in wet or snowy conditions
Tire B N'Fera RU1
Pros
- Exceptional value for money compared to premium tier brands
- High level of ride comfort and impact absorption over rough roads
- Low road noise and quiet highway cruising
Cons
- Faster-than-expected tread wear or chipping reported by some users
- Softer sidewalls can lead to reduced steering feedback and vague high-speed handling
- Mixed performance in colder temperatures or under hard acceleration
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Michelin Latitude Tour HP | B · Nexen N'Fera RU1 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | All Season | Summer |
| Vehicle type | SUV and 4x4 | SUV and 4x4 |
| Sizes available | 7 | 45 |
| Rim diameters | 16″ – 20″ | 16″ – 20″ |
| Tread depth | — | 10/32″ |
| UTQG | — | 320 A A |
| Sidewall | — | Blackwall |
| Max pressure | — | 51 psi |
| Sizes in common | 4 | 4 |
Which one should you actually buy?
Michelin Latitude Tour HP
Nexen N'Fera RU1
Winner: Nexen N'Fera RU1 — better handling, treadwear and wet. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Nexen N'Fera RU1 scores 65 vs 49 on handling.
Nexen N'Fera RU1 scores 67 vs 56 on treadwear.
Nexen N'Fera RU1 scores 68 vs 58 on wet.
Nexen N'Fera RU1 scores 68 vs 59 on snow.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Latitude Tour HP or N'Fera RU1?
Which is better in the wet, Latitude Tour HP or N'Fera RU1?
Nexen N'Fera RU1, 68 vs 58 on our wet score.
Which grips better on dry roads, Latitude Tour HP or N'Fera RU1?
Neither, by our numbers: 57 vs 59 on the dry score, within 3 points.
Which is better in snow, Latitude Tour HP or N'Fera RU1?
Nexen N'Fera RU1, 68 vs 59 on our snow score.
Which is more comfortable, Latitude Tour HP or N'Fera RU1?
Nexen N'Fera RU1, 65 vs 59 on our comfort score.
Which lasts longer, Latitude Tour HP or N'Fera RU1?
Nexen N'Fera RU1, 67 vs 56 on our treadwear score.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology