tirewheelguide

Yokohama Geolandar G055 Blue Earth looks discontinued: no new owner reviews or road tests in five years and no current EU tyre label.

Head-to-head Updated

Michelin Latitude Tour HP vs Yokohama Geolandar G055 Blue Earth — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews. Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 33 + 12 owner reviews. How we score

Too close to call: Latitude Tour HP 60, Geolandar G055 Blue Earth 61.

Check price on Amazon · Latitude Tour HP Check price on Amazon · Geolandar G055 Blue Earth
Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 60

    Dry

    Geolandar G055 Blue Earth +1
    61
    Why this score
    SourceLatitude Tour HPGeolandar G055 Blue Earth
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 63 (est.)≈ 64 (est.)
    Reviews found online5558

    Latitude Tour HP: 60% × 62.7 (est.) + 40% × 55.2 = 60

    Geolandar G055 Blue Earth: 60% × 63.8 (est.) + 40% × 58 = 61

    No road tests of dry for Latitude Tour HP. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).

    No road tests of dry for Geolandar G055 Blue Earth. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).

  2. 60

    Wet

    Latitude Tour HP +3
    57
    Why this score
    SourceLatitude Tour HPGeolandar G055 Blue Earth
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 63 (est.)≈ 60 (est.)
    Reviews found online5753

    Latitude Tour HP: 60% × 62.7 (est.) + 40% × 57.1 = 60

    Geolandar G055 Blue Earth: 60% × 60.3 (est.) + 40% × 52.9 = 57

    No road tests of wet for Latitude Tour HP. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).

    No road tests of wet for Geolandar G055 Blue Earth. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).

  3. 61

    Snow

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourceLatitude Tour HPGeolandar G055 Blue Earth
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 65 (est.)–
    Reviews found online55–

    Latitude Tour HP: 60% × 65.1 (est.) + 40% × 55.3 = 61

    No road tests of snow for Latitude Tour HP. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.33).

  4. 64

    Comfort

    Geolandar G055 Blue Earth +1
    65
    Why this score
    SourceLatitude Tour HPGeolandar G055 Blue Earth
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 67 (est.)≈ 68 (est.)
    Reviews found online5962

    Latitude Tour HP: 60% × 67.3 (est.) + 40% × 58.6 = 64

    Geolandar G055 Blue Earth: 60% × 67.9 (est.) + 40% × 61.8 = 65

    No road tests of comfort for Latitude Tour HP or Geolandar G055 Blue Earth. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.

  5. 59

    Treadwear

    Geolandar G055 Blue Earth +6
    65
    Why this score
    SourceLatitude Tour HPGeolandar G055 Blue Earth
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 62 (est.)≈ 65 (est.)
    Reviews found online5564

    Latitude Tour HP: 60% × 62.3 (est.) + 40% × 54.9 = 59

    Geolandar G055 Blue Earth: 60% × 65.1 (est.) + 40% × 64 = 65

    No road tests of treadwear for Latitude Tour HP. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).

    No road tests of treadwear for Geolandar G055 Blue Earth. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).

  6. 53

    Handling (owners)

    Geolandar G055 Blue Earth +5
    58
    Why this score
    SourceLatitude Tour HPGeolandar G055 Blue Earth
    Reviews found online5358
Scores at a glance
CategoryMichelin Latitude Tour HPYokohama Geolandar G055 Blue Earth
Relative Score 60 61
Dry 60 61
Wet 60 57
Snow 61 –
Comfort 64 65
Treadwear 59 65
Handling (owners) 53 58

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score

Latitude Tour HP

Geolandar G055 Blue Earth

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Latitude Tour HP

Pros

  • Excellent ride comfort and low road noise
  • Strong dry-weather handling and steering response
  • High durability and longevity for specific vehicle applications

Cons

  • Premature sidewall cracking and deterioration
  • Inconsistent tread life across different vehicle models
  • Poor traction and predictability in wet or snowy conditions
All owner themes in the Latitude Tour HP review

Tire B Geolandar G055 Blue Earth

Pros

  • Extremely quiet and comfortable ride quality
  • Improved fuel economy and low rolling resistance
  • Adequate dry road grip and handling

Cons

  • Dangerous or unreliable wet weather traction, particularly lateral grip and cornering
  • Prone to wheel spin on damp or wet surfaces
  • Accelerated or uneven tread wear reported on certain crossover and SUV models
All owner themes in the Geolandar G055 Blue Earth review

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Michelin Latitude Tour HP B · Yokohama Geolandar G055 Blue Earth
CategoryAll SeasonSummer
Vehicle typeSUV and 4x4SUV and 4x4
Sizes available7—
Rim diameters16″ – 20″—

Which one should you actually buy?

Michelin Latitude Tour HP

Yokohama Geolandar G055 Blue Earth

Too close to call: Michelin Latitude Tour HP and Yokohama Geolandar G055 Blue Earth are within 2 points overall. Michelin Latitude Tour HP is stronger on wet. Yokohama Geolandar G055 Blue Earth is stronger on treadwear. Yokohama Geolandar G055 Blue Earth rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 12 reviews), so read this result as provisional.

Pick tire B You want the longest tread life

Yokohama Geolandar G055 Blue Earth scores 65 vs 59 on treadwear.

Pick tire A Your priority is wet-weather safety

Michelin Latitude Tour HP scores 60 vs 57 on wet.

Tire A · Michelin Latitude Tour HP
Check price on Amazon
Tire B · Yokohama Geolandar G055 Blue Earth
Check price on Amazon

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Latitude Tour HP or Geolandar G055 Blue Earth?

Which is better in the wet, Latitude Tour HP or Geolandar G055 Blue Earth?

Michelin Latitude Tour HP, 60 vs 57 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, Latitude Tour HP or Geolandar G055 Blue Earth?

Neither, by our numbers: 60 vs 61 on the dry score, within 3 points.

Which is more comfortable, Latitude Tour HP or Geolandar G055 Blue Earth?

Neither, by our numbers: 64 vs 65 on the comfort score, within 3 points.

Which lasts longer, Latitude Tour HP or Geolandar G055 Blue Earth?

Yokohama Geolandar G055 Blue Earth, 65 vs 59 on our treadwear score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology