Tests – · none yet Owners 65 · 9 reviews
Michelin Latitude Tour vs Continental CrossContact LX Sport — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 9 + 562 owner reviews. How we score
Latitude Tour is ahead, 66–56
Add your size for an exact match
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests – · none yet Owners 48 · 562 reviews
“CRV-Hybrid Touring owners, how do you like your OEM tires? I'm a proud new owner of a '26 ST and I have the Continental Cross Contact LX Sport tires on my car. I'm not crazy about them. I'm wondering if I should upgrade to Michelin Defenders or something. Thoughts? The Touring comes with the Continental Cross Contact LX Sport (not to be confused with LX25) or the Michelin Primacy A/S. I sorta wish I would have pushed them to switch me to the Primacy A/S. Read more”
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
68
Dry
Latitude Tour +959Why this score
Source Latitude Tour CrossContact LX Sport Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 68 (est.) ≈ 62 (est.) Reviews found online 69 55 Latitude Tour: 60% × 68.3 (est.) + 40% × 68.6 = 68
CrossContact LX Sport: 60% × 62.5 (est.) + 40% × 54.7 = 59
No road tests of dry for Latitude Tour. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).
No road tests of dry for CrossContact LX Sport. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).
-
69
Wet
Latitude Tour +861Why this score
Source Latitude Tour CrossContact LX Sport Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 70 (est.) ≈ 63 (est.) Reviews found online 69 57 Latitude Tour: 60% × 69.6 (est.) + 40% × 68.7 = 69
CrossContact LX Sport: 60% × 63.2 (est.) + 40% × 57.1 = 61
No road tests of wet for Latitude Tour. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
No road tests of wet for CrossContact LX Sport. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
-
66
Snow
Latitude Tour +462Why this score
Source Latitude Tour CrossContact LX Sport Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 68 (est.) ≈ 66 (est.) Reviews found online 64 57 Latitude Tour: 60% × 68.1 (est.) + 40% × 63.6 = 66
CrossContact LX Sport: 60% × 65.8 (est.) + 40% × 57.4 = 62
No road tests of snow for Latitude Tour. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.37).
No road tests of snow for CrossContact LX Sport. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.37).
-
63
Comfort
Latitude Tour +162Why this score
Source Latitude Tour CrossContact LX Sport Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 68 (est.) ≈ 67 (est.) Reviews found online 61 58 Latitude Tour: 40% × 67.6 (est.) + 60% × 60.6 = 63
CrossContact LX Sport: 40% × 67.1 (est.) + 60% × 58 = 62
No road tests of comfort for Latitude Tour or CrossContact LX Sport. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
–
Noise
No comparison64Why this score
Source Latitude Tour CrossContact LX Sport Professional tests (TWG score) – ≈ 67 (est.) Reviews found online – 61 CrossContact LX Sport: 60% × 66.6 (est.) + 40% × 61 = 64
No road tests of noise for CrossContact LX Sport. The test half is the tested tires’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
64
Treadwear
Latitude Tour +2539Why this score
Source Latitude Tour CrossContact LX Sport Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 65 (est.) ≈ 51 (est.) Reviews found online 63 23 Latitude Tour: 60% × 65.1 (est.) + 40% × 63.1 = 64
CrossContact LX Sport: 60% × 50.8 (est.) + 40% × 22.5 = 39
No road tests of treadwear for Latitude Tour. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).
No road tests of treadwear for CrossContact LX Sport. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).
-
57
Handling (owners)
Latitude Tour +1146Why this score
Source Latitude Tour CrossContact LX Sport Reviews found online 57 46
Scores at a glance
| Category | Michelin Latitude Tour | Continental CrossContact LX Sport |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 66 | 56 |
| Dry | 68 | 59 |
| Wet | 69 | 61 |
| Snow | 66 | 62 |
| Comfort | 63 | 62 |
| Noise | – | 64 |
| Treadwear | 64 | 39 |
| Handling (owners) | 57 | 46 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Latitude Tour
CrossContact LX Sport
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A Latitude Tour
Pros
- Exceptional tread longevity and durability
- Very low road noise levels
- Smooth and comfortable ride quality
Cons
- Stiff ride characteristics, particularly in colder temperatures
- Inconsistent tread wear patterns, including premature flaking
- Limited performance in true winter conditions despite M+S rating
Tire B CrossContact LX Sport
Pros
- Low road noise and exceptional cabin comfort
- Strong handling and reliable grip in wet and dry conditions
- Confident performance in light snow and winter weather
Cons
- Disappointing tread life and faster-than-expected wear
- Occasional reports of reduced traction in heavy mud or specific slick conditions
- Higher price point relative to the longevity experienced by some drivers
What real owners are saying
From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score
Michelin Latitude Tour
We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.
Continental CrossContact LX Sport
Community opinion on the Continental Cross Contact LX Sport is mixed, with some drivers praising its comfort, balance of control, and low road noise. However, many owners express dissatisfaction with rapid tread wear, flaking or chunking, poor wet traction, and shallow initial tread depth. Several users consider replacing them early with options like Michelin CrossClimate or Defender models.
“I'm a fan of the Pirelli Scorpion WeatherActives, picked those over the Cross Climate 2s for my XC90 . Not a fan of the Continental CrossContact LX Sports on the wife's 2025 XC60 . Handling in wet feels like absolute garbage, but can't justify swapping them out just yet, but plan to put the WeatherActives or Cross Climate 3s, that's if they come to the States, on her ride when tread is down. Both vehicles ride on 20" rims. I'm also a fan of Vredsteins Quartrac Pro+ and the Nokian Remedy WRG5. Looks like Nokian's Encompass AW02 are in the same vein as the Cross Climate 2 design.”
“My tires were over inflated at purchase - with rears on my 2020 GLC 300 SUV showing 41.5 PSi, and the fronts were ~ 38.5 PSI. Checked cold tire pressure around sunrise this morning with temperature around 50 degrees. Using a high quality tire pressure gauge checked all tires this morning - and reduced pressure in all four tires to 35 PSI. Before the ride was ok but a bit stiff. Just curious if anyone is running these 18" tires and what you feel works best for your GLC 300's. I'd like to hear your thoughts & comments re: inflation pressure. 235/60 R 18 Continental Cross Contact LX Sport Tire size Inner fuel door pressurre table”
“A broken screw went partially into the tire tread, cutting one of the metal wires / belts in the casing. The tire is not losing air. I am concerned the damaged wire belt could lead to a tire failure. The open divot, deeper than the tire tread, also concerns me since it can get packed with debris, damage the other intact wire, or open the hole even more or further puncturing it. Tire is 2 years old with 17k miles so it's in great shape. Continental Cross Contact LX Sport 245/50 R20. This is on my wife's Pilot so I want her to have a reliable tire with no possibility of having a failure due to this damage, if that is likely here. What do you guys think?”
Based on 26 community posts
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Michelin Latitude Tour | B · Continental CrossContact LX Sport |
|---|---|---|
| Category | All Season | All Season |
| Vehicle type | SUV and 4x4 | SUV and 4x4 |
| Sizes available | 1 | 39 |
| Rim diameters | 17″ | 16″ – 22″ |
| Tread depth | — | 9/32″ |
| UTQG | — | 480 A A |
| Sidewall | — | Blackwall |
| Max pressure | — | 51 psi |
Which one should you actually buy?
Michelin Latitude Tour
Continental CrossContact LX Sport
Winner: Michelin Latitude Tour — better treadwear, handling and dry. It leads or ties in every category we score. Michelin Latitude Tour rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 9 reviews), so read this result as provisional.
Michelin Latitude Tour scores 64 vs 39 on treadwear.
Michelin Latitude Tour scores 57 vs 46 on handling.
Michelin Latitude Tour scores 68 vs 59 on dry.
Michelin Latitude Tour scores 69 vs 61 on wet.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Latitude Tour or CrossContact LX Sport?
Which is better in the wet, Latitude Tour or CrossContact LX Sport?
Michelin Latitude Tour, 69 vs 61 on our wet score.
Which grips better on dry roads, Latitude Tour or CrossContact LX Sport?
Michelin Latitude Tour, 68 vs 59 on our dry score.
Which is better in snow, Latitude Tour or CrossContact LX Sport?
Michelin Latitude Tour, 66 vs 62 on our snow score.
Which is more comfortable, Latitude Tour or CrossContact LX Sport?
Neither, by our numbers: 63 vs 62 on the comfort score, within 3 points.
Which lasts longer, Latitude Tour or CrossContact LX Sport?
Michelin Latitude Tour, 64 vs 39 on our treadwear score.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology