Tests – · none yet Owners 66 · 9 reviews
Michelin Latitude Tour vs Yokohama Advan Sport AS — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): 60% professional tests, 40% owner reviews.
Latitude Tour is ahead, 67–62
Add your size for an exact match
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests 61 · 2 tests Owners 64 · 15 reviews
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
69
Dry
Latitude Tour +1851Why this score
Source Latitude Tour Advan Sport AS Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 68 (est.) 42 Reviews found online 69 64 Latitude Tour: 60% × 68.2 (est.) + 40% × 69.3 = 69
Advan Sport AS: 60% × 42.3 + 40% × 64.2 = 51
No road tests of dry for Latitude Tour. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).
-
69
Wet
Latitude Tour +861Why this score
Source Latitude Tour Advan Sport AS Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 70 (est.) 57 Reviews found online 69 68 Latitude Tour: 60% × 69.5 (est.) + 40% × 69.4 = 69
Advan Sport AS: 60% × 57 + 40% × 67.5 = 61
No road tests of wet for Latitude Tour. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).
-
66
Snow
Latitude Tour +858Why this score
Source Latitude Tour Advan Sport AS Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 68 (est.) ≈ 63 (est.) Reviews found online 63 50 Latitude Tour: 60% × 67.5 (est.) + 40% × 62.8 = 66
Advan Sport AS: 60% × 63.2 (est.) + 40% × 49.6 = 58
No road tests of snow for Latitude Tour. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.33).
No road tests of snow for Advan Sport AS. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.33).
-
66
Comfort
Latitude Tour +165Why this score
Source Latitude Tour Advan Sport AS Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 68 (est.) 62 Reviews found online 64 68 Latitude Tour: 60% × 68.2 (est.) + 40% × 63.8 = 66
Advan Sport AS: 60% × 62.4 + 40% × 67.9 = 65
No road tests of comfort for Latitude Tour. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
–
Noise
No comparison70Why this score
Source Latitude Tour Advan Sport AS Professional tests (TWG score) – 72 Reviews found online – 67 Advan Sport AS: 60% × 72.4 + 40% × 66.6 = 70
-
65
Treadwear
Advan Sport AS +873Why this score
Source Latitude Tour Advan Sport AS Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 65 (est.) 79 Reviews found online 64 64 Latitude Tour: 60% × 65.2 (est.) + 40% × 64.3 = 65
Advan Sport AS: 60% × 78.6 + 40% × 63.7 = 73
No road tests of treadwear for Latitude Tour. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).
-
62
Handling
Advan Sport AS +466Why this score
Source Latitude Tour Advan Sport AS Reviews found online 62 66
Scores at a glance
| Category | Michelin Latitude Tour | Yokohama Advan Sport AS |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 67 | 62 |
| Dry | 69 | 51 |
| Wet | 69 | 61 |
| Snow | 66 | 58 |
| Comfort | 66 | 65 |
| Noise | – | 70 |
| Treadwear | 65 | 73 |
| Handling | 62 | 66 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Neither tire has a score here yet, so this weight changes nothing.
Latitude Tour
Advan Sport AS
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A Latitude Tour
Pros
- Exceptional tread longevity and durability
- Very low road noise levels
- Smooth and comfortable ride quality
Cons
- Stiff ride characteristics, particularly in colder temperatures
- Inconsistent tread wear patterns, including premature flaking
- Limited performance in true winter conditions despite M+S rating
Tire B Advan Sport AS
Pros
- Quiet and comfortable highway ride
- Good overall traction in wet and dry conditions
- Excellent value for the money compared to premium competitors
Cons
- Potential road force balancing issues reported by some users
- Some enthusiasts feel ultimate performance capability is lacking
- Tread life remains largely unproven in early-mileage reviews
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Michelin Latitude Tour | B · Yokohama Advan Sport AS |
|---|---|---|
| Category | All Season | All-Season tire |
| Vehicle type | SUV and 4x4 | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Tread depth | — | 11/32″ |
| UTQG | — | 440 A A |
| Treadwear warranty | — | 50,000 mi |
| Sidewall | — | Blackwall |
| Max pressure | — | 50 psi |
Which one should you actually buy?
Michelin Latitude Tour
Yokohama Advan Sport AS
Winner: Michelin Latitude Tour — better dry, wet and snow. Pick the Yokohama Advan Sport AS if treadwear and handling matter most to you.
Michelin Latitude Tour scores 69 vs 51 on dry.
Michelin Latitude Tour scores 69 vs 61 on wet.
Michelin Latitude Tour scores 66 vs 58 on snow.
Yokohama Advan Sport AS scores 73 vs 65 on treadwear.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.