Tests 91 · 23 tests Owners 84 · 33 reviews
Best test result: #1 of 31 in 2025 ADAC Winter Tyre Test (dry braking)
Michelin Primacy Alpin looks discontinued: no new owner reviews or road tests in five years and no current EU tyre label.
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 23 + 0 road tests and 33 + 5 owner reviews. How we score
Pilot Alpin 5 is ahead, 88–75
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests 91 · 23 tests Owners 84 · 33 reviews
Best test result: #1 of 31 in 2025 ADAC Winter Tyre Test (dry braking)
Tests – · none yet Owners 77 · 5 reviews
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
| Source | Pilot Alpin 5 | Primacy Alpin |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · 17 / – tests | 91 | ≈ 71 (est.) |
| Reviews found online | 84 | 75 |
Pilot Alpin 5: 60% × 90.7 + 40% × 84.3 = 88
Primacy Alpin: 60% × 70.8 (est.) + 40% × 75 = 73
No road tests of dry for Primacy Alpin. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).
| Source | Pilot Alpin 5 | Primacy Alpin |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · 23 / – tests | 95 | ≈ 78 (est.) |
| Reviews found online | 88 | 84 |
Pilot Alpin 5: 60% × 95.4 + 40% × 87.8 = 92
Primacy Alpin: 60% × 78 (est.) + 40% × 84 = 80
No road tests of wet for Primacy Alpin. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
| Source | Pilot Alpin 5 | Primacy Alpin |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · 22 / – tests | 93 | – |
| Reviews found online | 79 | – |
Pilot Alpin 5: 60% × 93.4 + 40% × 79.2 = 88
| Source | Pilot Alpin 5 | Primacy Alpin |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · 6 / – tests | 94 | ≈ 70 (est.) |
| Reviews found online | 79 | 75 |
Pilot Alpin 5: 40% × 93.7 + 60% × 78.5 = 85
Primacy Alpin: 40% × 70 (est.) + 60% × 75.1 = 73
No road tests of comfort for Primacy Alpin. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.
| Source | Pilot Alpin 5 | Primacy Alpin |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · 17 / – tests | 95 | – |
| Reviews found online | ≈ 66 (est.) | – |
Pilot Alpin 5: 60% × 95.3 + 40% × 66.5 (est.) = 84
No owner ratings of noise for Pilot Alpin 5. The owner half is the owners’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests, so the tests say nothing about how owners would rate it.
| Source | Pilot Alpin 5 | Primacy Alpin |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · 6 / – tests | 84 | ≈ 68 (est.) |
| Reviews found online | 84 | 71 |
Pilot Alpin 5: 60% × 84.4 + 40% × 84.2 = 84
Primacy Alpin: 60% × 68.2 (est.) + 40% × 71.1 = 69
No road tests of treadwear for Primacy Alpin. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
| Source | Pilot Alpin 5 | Primacy Alpin |
|---|---|---|
| Reviews found online | 87 | 77 |
| Source | Pilot Alpin 5 | Primacy Alpin |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · 17 / – tests | 72 | – |
| Category | Michelin Pilot Alpin 5 | Michelin Primacy Alpin |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 88 | 75 |
| Dry | 88 | 73 |
| Wet | 92 | 80 |
| Snow | 88 | – |
| Comfort | 85 | 73 |
| Noise | 84 | – |
| Treadwear | 84 | 69 |
| Handling (owners) | 87 | 77 |
| Efficiency | 72 | – |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Pilot Alpin 5
Primacy Alpin
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
| Attribute | A · Michelin Pilot Alpin 5 | B · Michelin Primacy Alpin |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Winter | Winter |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | 81 | — |
| Rim diameters | 16″ – 23″ | — |
Michelin Pilot Alpin 5
Michelin Primacy Alpin
Winner: Michelin Pilot Alpin 5 — better dry, treadwear and wet. It leads or ties in every category we score. Michelin Primacy Alpin rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 5 reviews), so read this result as provisional.
Michelin Pilot Alpin 5 scores 88 vs 73 on dry.
Michelin Pilot Alpin 5 scores 84 vs 69 on treadwear.
Michelin Pilot Alpin 5 scores 92 vs 80 on wet.
Michelin Pilot Alpin 5 scores 85 vs 73 on comfort.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Michelin Pilot Alpin 5, 92 vs 80 on our wet score.
Michelin Pilot Alpin 5, 88 vs 73 on our dry score.
Michelin Pilot Alpin 5, 85 vs 73 on our comfort score.
Michelin Pilot Alpin 5, 84 vs 69 on our treadwear score.
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology