Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 21 + 8 road tests and 12,721 + 45 owner reviews. How we score
Pilot Sport 4 is ahead, 81–76
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests 85 · 21 tests Owners 76 · 12,721 reviews
Best test result: #1 of 45 in 2019 Summer 53 Tyre Braking Shootout (dry braking)
“Those are Pilot sport 4 (all season). If it had s after the 4 it would be the summer high performance version. I put the pilot sport 4 on wife's GTI autobahn 2016. Great handling tire, stiff side walls, not the smoothest ride but best overall.”
Tests 70 · 8 tests Owners 85 · 45 reviews
Best test result: #1 of 20 in 2020 Auto Zeitung Summer Tyre Test (straight aquaplaning)
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
| Source | Pilot Sport 4 | Ultrac Satin |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · 20 / 8 tests | 89 | 54 |
| Reviews found online | 84 | 87 |
| Dry Braking (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 1–0 | 100% | 93% |
| Dry Handling (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 0–0 | 99% | 99% |
Pilot Sport 4: 60% × 89.3 + 40% × 83.9 = 87
Ultrac Satin: 60% × 53.9 + 40% × 86.8 = 67
| Source | Pilot Sport 4 | Ultrac Satin |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · 20 / 8 tests | 93 | 76 |
| Reviews found online | 85 | 86 |
| Wet Braking (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 1–0 | 100% | 96% |
| Wet Handling (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 1–0 | 100% | 95% |
Pilot Sport 4: 60% × 92.5 + 40% × 84.5 = 89
Ultrac Satin: 60% × 75.5 + 40% × 86.4 = 80
| Source | Pilot Sport 4 | Ultrac Satin |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · 6 / 3 tests | 82 | 92 |
| Reviews found online | 72 | 84 |
Pilot Sport 4: 40% × 81.5 + 60% × 71.7 = 76
Ultrac Satin: 40% × 92.1 + 60% × 83.6 = 87
| Source | Pilot Sport 4 | Ultrac Satin |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · 13 / 5 tests | 73 | 84 |
| Reviews found online | ≈ 66 (est.) | ≈ 66 (est.) |
Pilot Sport 4: 60% × 73.1 + 40% × 66.3 (est.) = 70
Ultrac Satin: 60% × 84.1 + 40% × 66.3 (est.) = 77
No owner ratings of noise for Pilot Sport 4 or Ultrac Satin. The owner half is the owners’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests, so the tests say nothing about how owners would rate it.
| Source | Pilot Sport 4 | Ultrac Satin |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · 3 / 1 tests | 78 | 70 |
| Reviews found online | 60 | 81 |
Pilot Sport 4: 60% × 78.1 + 40% × 59.5 = 71
Ultrac Satin: 60% × 69.7 + 40% × 80.7 = 74
| Source | Pilot Sport 4 | Ultrac Satin |
|---|---|---|
| Reviews found online | 81 | 85 |
| Source | Pilot Sport 4 | Ultrac Satin |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · 14 / 5 tests | 76 | 71 |
| Category | Michelin Pilot Sport 4 | Vredestein Ultrac Satin |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 81 | 76 |
| Dry | 87 | 67 |
| Wet | 89 | 80 |
| Comfort | 76 | 87 |
| Noise | 70 | 77 |
| Treadwear | 71 | 74 |
| Handling (owners) | 81 | 85 |
| Efficiency | 76 | 71 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Pilot Sport 4
Ultrac Satin
Per discipline: the average % of the best tire over every test both tires were in, and how many of those tests each one won. “Different tests” rows compare results from separate tests.
In the overall rankings of 1 tests that ran both, Michelin Pilot Sport 4 finished ahead 1 times and Vredestein Ultrac Satin 0 times.
| Discipline | Category | Pilot Sport 4 | Ultrac Satin | Δ | Head-to-head |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dry Braking | Dry | 100% | 93% | +7.0 | 1–0 in 1 shared test Newest: 2017 AMS Summer UHP Tyre Test · 245/45 R18 |
| Dry Handling | Dry | 99% | 99% | 0.0 | 0–0 in 1 shared test Newest: 2017 AMS Summer UHP Tyre Test · 245/45 R18 |
| Dry Handling (tester's mark) | Dry | 90% #2/9 · 2022 AUTO Straßenverkehr Summer Tire Test R19 | 57% #14/20 · 2020 Auto Zeitung Summer Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Straight Aquaplaning | Wet | 80% #2/9 · 2022 AUTO Straßenverkehr Summer Tire Test R19 | 100% #1/20 · 2020 Auto Zeitung Summer Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Wet Braking | Wet | 100% | 96% | +4.0 | 1–0 in 1 shared test Newest: 2017 AMS Summer UHP Tyre Test · 245/45 R18 |
| Wet Circle | Wet | 97% #4/10 · 2022 Sport Auto UHP, UUHP and Semi Slick Tyre Test | 98% #2/8 · 2020 Gute Fahrt SUV Summer Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Wet Handling | Wet | 100% | 95% | +5.0 | 1–0 in 1 shared test Newest: 2017 AMS Summer UHP Tyre Test · 245/45 R18 |
| Wet Handling (tester's mark) | Wet | 78% #7/9 · 2022 AUTO Straßenverkehr Summer Tire Test R19 | 58% #7/20 · 2020 Auto Zeitung Summer Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Comfort (tester's mark) | Comfort | 70% #5/9 · 2022 AUTO Straßenverkehr Summer Tire Test R19 | 100% #3/20 · 2020 Auto Zeitung Summer Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Noise | Noise | 99% #6/10 · 2022 Sport Auto UHP, UUHP and Semi Slick Tyre Test | 100% #2/20 · 2020 Auto Zeitung Summer Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Wear | Treadwear | 96% #5/16 · 2020 ADAC 18 Inch Summer Tyre Test | 71% #8/20 · 2017 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Rolling Resistance | Efficiency | 80% #2/9 · 2022 AUTO Straßenverkehr Summer Tire Test R19 | 79% #9/20 · 2020 Auto Zeitung Summer Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Also published by the testers (not in the score) | |||||
| Price | Cost | 66% #7/10 · 2022 Sport Auto UHP, UUHP and Semi Slick Tyre Test | 62% #11/20 · 2020 Auto Zeitung Summer Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Overall Ranking | Overall | #1/10 | #8/10 | – | 1–0 in 1 shared test Newest: 2017 AMS Summer UHP Tyre Test · 245/45 R18 |
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score
The community widely regards the Michelin Pilot Sport 4 line as a premium upgrade offering exceptional dry and wet grip, precise handling, and superior ride comfort compared to OEM or run-flat tires. While celebrated for performance, users frequently discuss its high price tag, faster treadwear, and noticeable drop in EV efficiency. Some drivers also note increased road noise and reduced traction when temperatures drop near freezing.
“I ran the stock 17" Ecopia's on my Ecosport for about 45k km. Luckily didn't face any side wall cuts. Overall it was a average tyre with decent grip levels - good grip without any squealing when driving up a ghat road quite enthusiastically even at the fag end of it's life. Ride quality was pretty bad and the smallest of ruts would result in a thud and being low profile amplified it even more. The tyres developed these cracks along the shoulder around the 35-40k mark which should not have happened due to which I changed them at 45k even though there was probably enough thread for about 5-10k km more. Moved to the Michelin PS4 now and the difference is night and day!”
“Quote: Originally Posted by ua549 In over 55 years of driving I've never gotten more than 20k miles on a set of tires. Michelin Pilot Sport is the worst at 6k miles twice in a row with free factory replacements though I've gotten 18k miles on Michelin AS3 tires once or twice. Dunlop Sport is second at 15k miles. Overall Pirelli Cinturato P7 are the longest wearing tires I've owned over the years at 20k miles consistently. I swap out run flat tires if they come on a new car. I believe that heat is a major cause of tire wear. Even after a 2 mile trip @ 35 mph the tires on my E300 register about 120°F. Cold they are between 80°F and 85°F. In the dead of winter they are 5° colder. The OEM tires on my 5 year old '18 E300 got 12k miles. The car has 20k miles on it now and the P7 tires are about 40% worn. My experience with Summer tires is 15 to 18k max. The only Summer tires that I have owned that lasted more than 20 were the Pilot Sport PS4...which BTW is one of their marketing highlights, longer tread wear...though still shorter than all seasons which normally are rated for 30k or more.”
“The Pilot Sport 4's are great tires for dual duty use. You'll want to keep hot pressures below 37-38 PSI. Anything above that they get very greasy, very fast. In the cars I've driven with them (a few BMW M cars, a 911 I think if I remember), you'll usually set your best laps in the first 4-5 laps of a session depending on temps. Once they over heat heat, as with any street tire, you have to park them for an hour to get the temps down again (downside to steel radials). I'd also recommend Hankook RS4s if you want a more durable track tire. That's what I run. Very long lasting, but not as great in the wet as the PS4s would be. Road noise would also be an issue for street use.”
Based on 246 community posts
We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.
| Attribute | A · Michelin Pilot Sport 4 | B · Vredestein Ultrac Satin |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer | Summer |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | 62 | 52 |
| Rim diameters | 16″ – 20″ | 16″ – 20″ |
| UTQG | 300 - 320 A - AA A | — |
| Sizes in common | 29 | 29 |
Michelin Pilot Sport 4
Vredestein Ultrac Satin
Winner: Michelin Pilot Sport 4 — better dry, wet and efficiency. Pick the Vredestein Ultrac Satin if comfort, noise and treadwear matter most to you.
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 scores 87 vs 67 on dry.
Vredestein Ultrac Satin scores 87 vs 76 on comfort.
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 scores 89 vs 80 on wet.
Vredestein Ultrac Satin scores 77 vs 70 on noise.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Michelin Pilot Sport 4, 89 vs 80 on our wet score.
Michelin Pilot Sport 4, 87 vs 67 on our dry score.
Vredestein Ultrac Satin, 77 vs 70 on our noise score.
Vredestein Ultrac Satin, 87 vs 76 on our comfort score.
Vredestein Ultrac Satin, 74 vs 71 on our treadwear score.
Michelin Pilot Sport 4, 76 vs 71 on our efficiency score.
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology
