Head-to-head Updated

Michelin Pilot Sport 4 vs Vredestein Ultrac Sessanta — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 21 + 0 road tests and 12,721 + 237 owner reviews. How we score

Pilot Sport 4 leads, 83–79 Narrow edge

Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Michelin Pilot Sport 4
Tire AMichelin

Pilot Sport 4

Summer

± 4

Tests 85 · 21 tests Owners 76 · 12,721 reviews

Best test result: #1 of 45 in 2019 Summer 53 Tyre Braking Shootout (dry braking)

“Those are Pilot sport 4 (all season). If it had s after the 4 it would be the summer high performance version. I put the pilot sport 4 on wife's GTI autobahn 2016. Great handling tire, stiff side walls, not the smoothest ride but best overall.”

Vredestein Ultrac Sessanta
± 8

Tests – · none yet Owners 82 · 237 reviews

“I ran Vredestein Ultrac Sessanta on my IS350 15 years ago and absolutely loved them! Unless their quality has gone down since then I I wouldn’t hesitate to run them again.”

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 87

    Dry

    Pilot Sport 4 +7
    80
    Why this score
    SourcePilot Sport 4Ultrac Sessanta
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 20 / – tests89≈ 76 (est.)
    Reviews found online8486

    Pilot Sport 4: 60% × 89.3 + 40% × 84 = 87

    Ultrac Sessanta: 60% × 75.5 (est.) + 40% × 86.2 = 80

    No road tests of dry for Ultrac Sessanta. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).

  2. 89

    Wet

    Pilot Sport 4 +6
    83
    Why this score
    SourcePilot Sport 4Ultrac Sessanta
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 20 / – tests93≈ 80 (est.)
    Reviews found online8587

    Pilot Sport 4: 60% × 92.6 + 40% × 84.5 = 89

    Ultrac Sessanta: 60% × 79.7 (est.) + 40% × 87.1 = 83

    No road tests of wet for Ultrac Sessanta. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

  3. 76

    Comfort

    Ultrac Sessanta +1
    77
    Why this score
    SourcePilot Sport 4Ultrac Sessanta
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 6 / – tests81≈ 71 (est.)
    Reviews found online7280

    Pilot Sport 4: 40% × 81.2 + 60% × 71.7 = 76

    Ultrac Sessanta: 40% × 71.1 (est.) + 60% × 80.2 = 77

    No road tests of comfort for Ultrac Sessanta. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).

  4. 70

    Noise

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourcePilot Sport 4Ultrac Sessanta
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 13 / – tests73–
    Reviews found online≈ 66 (est.)–

    Pilot Sport 4: 60% × 73.1 + 40% × 66.3 (est.) = 70

    No owner ratings of noise for Pilot Sport 4. The owner half is the owners’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests, so the tests say nothing about how owners would rate it.

  5. 71

    Treadwear

    Level
    71
    Why this score
    SourcePilot Sport 4Ultrac Sessanta
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 3 / – tests78≈ 69 (est.)
    Reviews found online6074

    Pilot Sport 4: 60% × 78.1 + 40% × 59.5 = 71

    Ultrac Sessanta: 60% × 69.1 (est.) + 40% × 73.6 = 71

    No road tests of treadwear for Ultrac Sessanta. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).

  6. 81

    Handling (owners)

    Ultrac Sessanta +3
    84
    Why this score
    SourcePilot Sport 4Ultrac Sessanta
    Reviews found online8184
  7. 76

    Efficiency

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourcePilot Sport 4Ultrac Sessanta
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 14 / – tests76–
Scores at a glance
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 vs Vredestein Ultrac Sessanta: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryMichelin Pilot Sport 4Vredestein Ultrac Sessanta
Relative Score 83 79
Dry 87 80
Wet 89 83
Comfort 76 77
Noise 70 –
Treadwear 71 71
Handling (owners) 81 84
Efficiency 76 –

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Not important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Recomputed
Headline score
± 4

Pilot Sport 4

± 8

Ultrac Sessanta

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Pilot Sport 4

Pros

  • Exceptional wet and dry traction with outstanding resistance to aquaplaning
  • Noticeable improvement in ride comfort and a reduction in cabin noise compared to standard run-flat tires
  • Progressive and predictable breakaway limits during spirited driving

Cons

  • Faster-than-average treadwear, particularly under aggressive driving or on rear-wheel-drive performance cars
  • Softer sidewalls can lead to a slight lack of initial steering precision and a vague feel at the limit for hardcore enthusiasts
  • Performance drops off significantly in cold, freezing, or snowy winter conditions
All owner themes in the Pilot Sport 4 review

Tire B Ultrac Sessanta

Pros

  • Exceptional wet and dry traction
  • High value-for-money ratio compared to premium competitors
  • Predictable and progressive handling characteristics

Cons

  • Inconsistent tread life, with many users reporting rapid wear
  • Increased road noise, often described as a drone or bearing-like sound
  • Poor performance in snow and icy conditions
All owner themes in the Ultrac Sessanta review

What real owners are saying

From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score

Tire A

Michelin Pilot Sport 4

Positive

The community widely regards the Michelin Pilot Sport 4 line as a premium upgrade offering exceptional dry and wet grip, precise handling, and superior ride comfort compared to OEM or run-flat tires. While celebrated for performance, users frequently discuss its high price tag, faster treadwear, and noticeable drop in EV efficiency. Some drivers also note increased road noise and reduced traction when temperatures drop near freezing.

r/BMW ·1 upvote ·2024-09-24

“I basically always ran Michelins on the BMWs I had. Pilot Super Sport on the E91 335d (which unexpectedly did really well wrt longevity with 600nm+ and a heavy foot) and now PS4 ZP (so the runflat type) on my 320hp F31 330d. They are just really really good. Pretty pricey though.”

team-bhp.com

“I ran the stock 17" Ecopia's on my Ecosport for about 45k km. Luckily didn't face any side wall cuts. Overall it was a average tyre with decent grip levels - good grip without any squealing when driving up a ghat road quite enthusiastically even at the fag end of it's life. Ride quality was pretty bad and the smallest of ruts would result in a thud and being low profile amplified it even more. The tyres developed these cracks along the shoulder around the 35-40k mark which should not have happened due to which I changed them at 45k even though there was probably enough thread for about 5-10k km more. Moved to the Michelin PS4 now and the difference is night and day!”

mbworld.org

“Quote: Originally Posted by ua549 In over 55 years of driving I've never gotten more than 20k miles on a set of tires. Michelin Pilot Sport is the worst at 6k miles twice in a row with free factory replacements though I've gotten 18k miles on Michelin AS3 tires once or twice. Dunlop Sport is second at 15k miles. Overall Pirelli Cinturato P7 are the longest wearing tires I've owned over the years at 20k miles consistently. I swap out run flat tires if they come on a new car. I believe that heat is a major cause of tire wear. Even after a 2 mile trip @ 35 mph the tires on my E300 register about 120°F. Cold they are between 80°F and 85°F. In the dead of winter they are 5° colder. The OEM tires on my 5 year old '18 E300 got 12k miles. The car has 20k miles on it now and the P7 tires are about 40% worn. My experience with Summer tires is 15 to 18k max. The only Summer tires that I have owned that lasted more than 20 were the Pilot Sport PS4...which BTW is one of their marketing highlights, longer tread wear...though still shorter than all seasons which normally are rated for 30k or more.”

Top themes
#Wet and dry grip#Run-flat replacement upgrade#Treadwear and longevity#Cold weather performance#Road noise and comfort#EV range and efficiency#Comparison to Continental tires

Based on 246 community posts

Tire B

Vredestein Ultrac Sessanta

Positive

Community opinion on the Vredestein Ultrac Sessanta is overwhelmingly positive, with drivers praising its high value, impressive wet and dry grip, and smooth, quiet ride compared to stiff run-flat tires. While a few noted soft sidewalls or increased noise late in the tread life, the tire developed a strong reputation for offering high-end performance at an affordable price point.

r/ZL1 ·2 upvotes ·2013-12-15

“I just had a set of Vredestein Ultrac Sessanta put on. Initial thoughts... I got them in 275/40/20 for the fronts and 315/35/20 for the rears. They fit the wheels perfectly. I immediately noticed a much softer ride. Sport Mode now feels like Tour Mode, maybe even softer. I DD my ZL1 so cold weather performance is very important. Temps were near 40°F and they stayed quite grippy. This is a huge improvement over the stock Goodyear's. Initial turn in response is good. I had the opportunity to push them on an off ramp and they felt a little mushy when pushed and didn't seem to want to exceed .75g I had a set of these on a previous car (2004 ZO6) and expect great wet weather performance. I will update this post once I get some more miles on them.”

mbworld.org

“Quote: Originally Posted by Untertürkheim Sorry, but I must disagree. I found these tires to be very bad in the rain, I ended up replacing them very early for that reason alone. That's odd. The Ultrac Sessanta? The Vreds were much better than the Conti 2 I had on my Bimmer. I live in LA, but in Pacific Palisades where we get dumps of rain often in the winter. No hydroplaning, great feeling of stability. On other forums, the Vreds are normally considered good in the wet. btw, there are 20 pages about this tire on the Corvette forum here: Here's just one quote on that long thread: "As for the RAIN.. They are insane on the rain.. no slipping, or gliding, only traction" And another: "Drove through a monsoon in Redding, CA on the way down and no hydroplaining and my buddy following me said the water seeemd to come out behind the car and not spread sideways as you normally see." I had the same experience. So, maybe they just don't work well on a MB(??)”

bobistheoilguy.com ·2018-10-27

“Originally Posted by CBR.worm I ran a couple set of the Vredestein Ultrac Sessanta tires, they were great - super sticky wet and dry and smooth. Unfortunately, they stopped making them in my size a few years ago. I was very happy with them. I know they are totally different than what you are looking at, but there isn't a lot of info out there (here in the US) about the brand. Is your tire size 235/45-18? They don't make the Sessanta in any size anymore! It is an older, now discontinued line. Vredestein does offer both the Ultrac Satin and Ultrac Vorti in your size 235/45-18”

Top themes
#Ride Comfort and Noise#Price and Value#Dry and Wet Grip#Unique Tread Pattern#Transition from Run-Flats

Based on 55 community posts

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Michelin Pilot Sport 4 B · Vredestein Ultrac Sessanta
CategorySummerSummer
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover
Sizes available62—
Rim diameters16″ – 20″—
UTQG300 - 320 A - AA A280 AA A

Which one should you actually buy?

Michelin Pilot Sport 4

Vredestein Ultrac Sessanta

Narrow edge: Michelin Pilot Sport 4 — better dry and wet. Where the Vredestein Ultrac Sessanta is ahead, it is by less than 3 points.

Pick tire A You want the most grip on dry roads

Michelin Pilot Sport 4 scores 87 vs 80 on dry.

Pick tire A Your priority is wet-weather safety

Michelin Pilot Sport 4 scores 89 vs 83 on wet.

Tire A · Michelin Pilot Sport 4
Tire B · Vredestein Ultrac Sessanta

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Pilot Sport 4 or Ultrac Sessanta?

Which is better in the wet, Pilot Sport 4 or Ultrac Sessanta?

Michelin Pilot Sport 4, 89 vs 83 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, Pilot Sport 4 or Ultrac Sessanta?

Michelin Pilot Sport 4, 87 vs 80 on our dry score.

Which is more comfortable, Pilot Sport 4 or Ultrac Sessanta?

Neither, by our numbers: 76 vs 77 on the comfort score, within 3 points.

Which lasts longer, Pilot Sport 4 or Ultrac Sessanta?

Neither, by our numbers: 71 vs 71 on the treadwear score, within 3 points.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology