Tests – · none yet Owners 82 · 237 reviews
“I ran Vredestein Ultrac Sessanta on my IS350 15 years ago and absolutely loved them! Unless their quality has gone down since then I I wouldn’t hesitate to run them again.”
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 14 road tests and 237 + 2,532 owner reviews. How we score
Ultrac Sessanta leads, 79–76 Narrow edge
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests – · none yet Owners 82 · 237 reviews
“I ran Vredestein Ultrac Sessanta on my IS350 15 years ago and absolutely loved them! Unless their quality has gone down since then I I wouldn’t hesitate to run them again.”
Tests 77 · 14 tests Owners 71 · 2,532 reviews
Best test result: #1 of 21 in 2022 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test (dry handling)
“Simbolul cu mașina și fulgerul de pe Hankook Ventus Prime 4 arată că anvelopa e compatibilă și cu mașini electrice (EV), nu că e destinată exclusiv lor. Poate fi folosită fără probleme și pe mașini cu motor termic.”
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
| Source | Ultrac Sessanta | Ventus Prime 4 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 12 tests | ≈ 76 (est.) | 83 |
| Reviews found online | 86 | 73 |
Ultrac Sessanta: 60% × 75.5 (est.) + 40% × 86.2 = 80
Ventus Prime 4: 60% × 82.7 + 40% × 73.2 = 79
No road tests of dry for Ultrac Sessanta. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).
| Source | Ultrac Sessanta | Ventus Prime 4 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 13 tests | ≈ 80 (est.) | 79 |
| Reviews found online | 87 | 75 |
Ultrac Sessanta: 60% × 79.7 (est.) + 40% × 87.1 = 83
Ventus Prime 4: 60% × 78.6 + 40% × 74.6 = 77
No road tests of wet for Ultrac Sessanta. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
| Source | Ultrac Sessanta | Ventus Prime 4 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests | ≈ 71 (est.) | 70 |
| Reviews found online | 80 | 67 |
Ultrac Sessanta: 40% × 71.1 (est.) + 60% × 80.2 = 77
Ventus Prime 4: 40% × 70.3 + 60% × 67.4 = 69
No road tests of comfort for Ultrac Sessanta. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).
| Source | Ultrac Sessanta | Ventus Prime 4 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 8 tests | – | 58 |
| Reviews found online | – | ≈ 66 (est.) |
Ventus Prime 4: 60% × 57.6 + 40% × 66.3 (est.) = 61
No owner ratings of noise for Ventus Prime 4. The owner half is the owners’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests, so the tests say nothing about how owners would rate it.
| Source | Ultrac Sessanta | Ventus Prime 4 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 6 tests | ≈ 69 (est.) | 79 |
| Reviews found online | 74 | 67 |
Ultrac Sessanta: 60% × 69.1 (est.) + 40% × 73.6 = 71
Ventus Prime 4: 60% × 78.5 + 40% × 66.9 = 74
No road tests of treadwear for Ultrac Sessanta. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
| Source | Ultrac Sessanta | Ventus Prime 4 |
|---|---|---|
| Reviews found online | 84 | 72 |
| Source | Ultrac Sessanta | Ventus Prime 4 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 9 tests | – | 84 |
| Category | Vredestein Ultrac Sessanta | Hankook Ventus Prime 4 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 79 | 76 |
| Dry | 80 | 79 |
| Wet | 83 | 77 |
| Comfort | 77 | 69 |
| Noise | – | 61 |
| Treadwear | 71 | 74 |
| Handling (owners) | 84 | 72 |
| Efficiency | – | 84 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Ultrac Sessanta
Ventus Prime 4
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score
Community opinion on the Vredestein Ultrac Sessanta is overwhelmingly positive, with drivers praising its high value, impressive wet and dry grip, and smooth, quiet ride compared to stiff run-flat tires. While a few noted soft sidewalls or increased noise late in the tread life, the tire developed a strong reputation for offering high-end performance at an affordable price point.
“I just had a set of Vredestein Ultrac Sessanta put on. Initial thoughts... I got them in 275/40/20 for the fronts and 315/35/20 for the rears. They fit the wheels perfectly. I immediately noticed a much softer ride. Sport Mode now feels like Tour Mode, maybe even softer. I DD my ZL1 so cold weather performance is very important. Temps were near 40°F and they stayed quite grippy. This is a huge improvement over the stock Goodyear's. Initial turn in response is good. I had the opportunity to push them on an off ramp and they felt a little mushy when pushed and didn't seem to want to exceed .75g I had a set of these on a previous car (2004 ZO6) and expect great wet weather performance. I will update this post once I get some more miles on them.”
“Quote: Originally Posted by Untertürkheim Sorry, but I must disagree. I found these tires to be very bad in the rain, I ended up replacing them very early for that reason alone. That's odd. The Ultrac Sessanta? The Vreds were much better than the Conti 2 I had on my Bimmer. I live in LA, but in Pacific Palisades where we get dumps of rain often in the winter. No hydroplaning, great feeling of stability. On other forums, the Vreds are normally considered good in the wet. btw, there are 20 pages about this tire on the Corvette forum here: Here's just one quote on that long thread: "As for the RAIN.. They are insane on the rain.. no slipping, or gliding, only traction" And another: "Drove through a monsoon in Redding, CA on the way down and no hydroplaining and my buddy following me said the water seeemd to come out behind the car and not spread sideways as you normally see." I had the same experience. So, maybe they just don't work well on a MB(??)”
“Originally Posted by CBR.worm I ran a couple set of the Vredestein Ultrac Sessanta tires, they were great - super sticky wet and dry and smooth. Unfortunately, they stopped making them in my size a few years ago. I was very happy with them. I know they are totally different than what you are looking at, but there isn't a lot of info out there (here in the US) about the brand. Is your tire size 235/45-18? They don't make the Sessanta in any size anymore! It is an older, now discontinued line. Vredestein does offer both the Ultrac Satin and Ultrac Vorti in your size 235/45-18”
Based on 55 community posts
Community opinion on the Hankook Ventus Prime 4 is largely positive, with drivers viewing it as a comfortable, quiet, and capable touring tire. Users frequently praise its strong dry and wet performance alongside its compelling price-to-performance ratio compared to premium alternatives like Michelin. Some uncertainties exist regarding long-term tread wear and slight fuel economy impacts, but owners generally report satisfactory everyday reliability.
“Ya. I read that review too. If I up the psi to 3, or 4 would result in hard and harsh bumps and much less comfy ride which I don't like. Therefore, I settle for 34 front and 32 back and started back to use Eco mode. I don't carry heavy loads and many pax in my car. I restricted it to 4 adult pax including myself as a driver, with or without loads at the boot.”
“Found a cut on one of my tires, is it 100% cooked? Three month old Hankook Ventus Prime 4, covered less than 600miles. Found a small cut on the front right one. It is holding air fine. I will go to a tire shop to get checked asap, but chances that it’s ok? And what could have caused it? Hitting a curb? Thank you in advance!”
“Becsapós ez, nagyon kevés csapadék volt a nyáron, és nagyon könnyű megszokni a száraz tapadást. Aztan meglepődik az ember az esőben. Nekem is volt ilyen gumi az autón, előtte meg az volt rajta amivel vettem (valami noname), hát a Hankook egy nagyságrenddel jobb volt annál. Most VP4 van rajta, es rendben van az is szerintem.”
Based on 41 community posts
| Attribute | A · Vredestein Ultrac Sessanta | B · Hankook Ventus Prime 4 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer | Summer |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | — |
| Sizes available | — | 66 |
| Rim diameters | — | 15″ – 20″ |
| UTQG | 280 AA A | 200 - 420 A A |
Vredestein Ultrac Sessanta
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
Narrow edge: Vredestein Ultrac Sessanta — better handling, comfort and wet. Pick the Hankook Ventus Prime 4 if treadwear matters most to you.
Vredestein Ultrac Sessanta scores 84 vs 72 on handling.
Vredestein Ultrac Sessanta scores 77 vs 69 on comfort.
Vredestein Ultrac Sessanta scores 83 vs 77 on wet.
Hankook Ventus Prime 4 scores 74 vs 71 on treadwear.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Vredestein Ultrac Sessanta, 83 vs 77 on our wet score.
Neither, by our numbers: 80 vs 79 on the dry score, within 3 points.
Vredestein Ultrac Sessanta, 77 vs 69 on our comfort score.
Hankook Ventus Prime 4, 74 vs 71 on our treadwear score.
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology