Tests – · none yet Owners 82 · 237 reviews
“I ran Vredestein Ultrac Sessanta on my IS350 15 years ago and absolutely loved them! Unless their quality has gone down since then I I wouldn’t hesitate to run them again.”
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 13 road tests and 237 + 2,509 owner reviews. How we score
Ultrac Sessanta leads, 80–77 Narrow edge
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests – · none yet Owners 82 · 237 reviews
“I ran Vredestein Ultrac Sessanta on my IS350 15 years ago and absolutely loved them! Unless their quality has gone down since then I I wouldn’t hesitate to run them again.”
Tests 78 · 13 tests Owners 71 · 2,509 reviews
Best test result: #1 of 21 in 2022 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test (dry handling)
“Simbolul cu mașina și fulgerul de pe Hankook Ventus Prime 4 arată că anvelopa e compatibilă și cu mașini electrice (EV), nu că e destinată exclusiv lor. Poate fi folosită fără probleme și pe mașini cu motor termic.”
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
| Source | Ultrac Sessanta | Ventus Prime 4 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 11 tests | ≈ 76 (est.) | 84 |
| Reviews found online | 87 | 73 |
Ultrac Sessanta: 60% × 75.9 (est.) + 40% × 86.7 = 80
Ventus Prime 4: 60% × 84.2 + 40% × 73.4 = 80
No road tests of dry for Ultrac Sessanta. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).
| Source | Ultrac Sessanta | Ventus Prime 4 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 12 tests | ≈ 80 (est.) | 81 |
| Reviews found online | 87 | 75 |
Ultrac Sessanta: 60% × 79.9 (est.) + 40% × 87.2 = 83
Ventus Prime 4: 60% × 80.5 + 40% × 74.6 = 78
No road tests of wet for Ultrac Sessanta. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
| Source | Ultrac Sessanta | Ventus Prime 4 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests | ≈ 71 (est.) | 70 |
| Reviews found online | 81 | 68 |
Ultrac Sessanta: 40% × 71.3 (est.) + 60% × 80.9 = 77
Ventus Prime 4: 40% × 70.3 + 60% × 67.9 = 69
No road tests of comfort for Ultrac Sessanta. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.
| Source | Ultrac Sessanta | Ventus Prime 4 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 8 tests | – | 58 |
| Reviews found online | – | ≈ 67 (est.) |
Ventus Prime 4: 60% × 57.6 + 40% × 66.6 (est.) = 61
No owner ratings of noise for Ventus Prime 4. The owner half is the owners’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests, so the tests say nothing about how owners would rate it.
| Source | Ultrac Sessanta | Ventus Prime 4 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 5 tests | ≈ 69 (est.) | 78 |
| Reviews found online | 73 | 67 |
Ultrac Sessanta: 60% × 68.7 (est.) + 40% × 73.4 = 71
Ventus Prime 4: 60% × 78.2 + 40% × 66.7 = 74
No road tests of treadwear for Ultrac Sessanta. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).
| Source | Ultrac Sessanta | Ventus Prime 4 |
|---|---|---|
| Reviews found online | 85 | 72 |
| Source | Ultrac Sessanta | Ventus Prime 4 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 8 tests | – | 83 |
| Category | Vredestein Ultrac Sessanta | Hankook Ventus Prime 4 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 80 | 77 |
| Dry | 80 | 80 |
| Wet | 83 | 78 |
| Comfort | 77 | 69 |
| Noise | – | 61 |
| Treadwear | 71 | 74 |
| Handling (owners) | 85 | 72 |
| Efficiency | – | 83 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Ultrac Sessanta
Ventus Prime 4
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score
Community opinion on the Vredestein Ultrac Sessanta is overwhelmingly positive, with drivers praising its high value, impressive wet and dry grip, and smooth, quiet ride compared to stiff run-flat tires. While a few noted soft sidewalls or increased noise late in the tread life, the tire developed a strong reputation for offering high-end performance at an affordable price point.
“I have them also. I love them. I haven't raced with them and my car is a daily driver. But I take some nice mountain twisty roads on the way to work along with highway roads and it preforms great anywhere. Also not so bad in the rain. Overall I love these tires for the price. I would recommend them to anyone. I'm hopping to get some fresh pics soon. Mine are 18/19. Here are some old photos on my old rims. I have the same tires on my new rims (18/19 C6Z deep dish, black with polished lip).”
“Quote: Originally Posted by anandpadhye Local manufacturing is the news but isn't the brand already available in India? Very right, Anand. They were available in select sizes (mostly the Sportrac range) throughout, but looks like Apollo has now brought in the 16 - 20" moulds to make them here. They have some exquisite tread patterns, especially the Ultrac Sessanta. But better to see their reliability under Indian conditions and then buy a set.”
“Yesterday was the first time I'd driven the car more than 2 miles since making the switch from the RFT RE050A's to the ultrac sessanta's. Covered 50 miles on A roads and Motorways. Overall impressions were good, the car was less harsh over broken surfaces. I had no feeling of road camber effecting the steering. I noticed on jacking the car that the sidewalls are pretty soft, I added a few PSI over the stock settings. You still feel all the bumps as is to be expected on 40 profile tyres, just less intrusive. I still have to drive on B roads but so far so good. Jason”
Based on 55 community posts
Community opinion on the Hankook Ventus Prime 4 is largely positive, with drivers viewing it as a comfortable, quiet, and capable touring tire. Users frequently praise its strong dry and wet performance alongside its compelling price-to-performance ratio compared to premium alternatives like Michelin. Some uncertainties exist regarding long-term tread wear and slight fuel economy impacts, but owners generally report satisfactory everyday reliability.
“Found a cut on one of my tires, is it 100% cooked? Three month old Hankook Ventus Prime 4 and I found a cut/split. It’s holding air fine but it is cooked?”
“Top top top guma, stavio prosle godine kad sam kupio auto, odmah na Kupres isao, snijega i leda bilo dosta, ali izdale me nisu Imam i ljetne hankook ventus prime 4 isto odlicna guma”
“Aim for rainy condition. Best are 1.Bridgestone Turanza 005 2.Hankook ventus prime 4.”
Based on 41 community posts
| Attribute | A · Vredestein Ultrac Sessanta | B · Hankook Ventus Prime 4 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer | Summer |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | — |
| Sizes available | — | 66 |
| Rim diameters | — | 15″ – 20″ |
Vredestein Ultrac Sessanta
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
Narrow edge: Vredestein Ultrac Sessanta — better handling, comfort and wet. Pick the Hankook Ventus Prime 4 if treadwear matters most to you.
Vredestein Ultrac Sessanta scores 85 vs 72 on handling.
Vredestein Ultrac Sessanta scores 77 vs 69 on comfort.
Vredestein Ultrac Sessanta scores 83 vs 78 on wet.
Hankook Ventus Prime 4 scores 74 vs 71 on treadwear.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Vredestein Ultrac Sessanta, 83 vs 78 on our wet score.
Neither, by our numbers: 80 vs 80 on the dry score, within 3 points.
Vredestein Ultrac Sessanta, 77 vs 69 on our comfort score.
Hankook Ventus Prime 4, 74 vs 71 on our treadwear score.
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology