Tests 86 · 23 tests Owners 87 · 6,510 reviews
Best test result: #1 of 20 in 2026 Autobild Summer Tyre Test (dry handling (tester's mark))
“Put some 235/45 R17 ps5’s on my 9-5 They fill up the arches quite nice!”
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 23 + 8 road tests and 6,510 + 45 owner reviews. How we score
Pilot Sport 5 is ahead, 86–76
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests 86 · 23 tests Owners 87 · 6,510 reviews
Best test result: #1 of 20 in 2026 Autobild Summer Tyre Test (dry handling (tester's mark))
“Put some 235/45 R17 ps5’s on my 9-5 They fill up the arches quite nice!”
Tests 70 · 8 tests Owners 85 · 45 reviews
Best test result: #1 of 20 in 2020 Auto Zeitung Summer Tyre Test (straight aquaplaning)
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
| Source | Pilot Sport 5 | Ultrac Satin |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · 23 / 8 tests | 93 | 54 |
| Reviews found online | 90 | 87 |
Pilot Sport 5: 60% × 93.2 + 40% × 90.2 = 92
Ultrac Satin: 60% × 53.9 + 40% × 86.9 = 67
| Source | Pilot Sport 5 | Ultrac Satin |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · 23 / 8 tests | 94 | 76 |
| Reviews found online | 93 | 86 |
Pilot Sport 5: 60% × 93.7 + 40% × 93.3 = 94
Ultrac Satin: 60% × 75.5 + 40% × 86.4 = 80
| Source | Pilot Sport 5 | Ultrac Satin |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · 9 / 3 tests | 71 | 92 |
| Reviews found online | 83 | 84 |
Pilot Sport 5: 40% × 70.9 + 60% × 83.4 = 78
Ultrac Satin: 40% × 92.3 + 60% × 83.7 = 87
| Source | Pilot Sport 5 | Ultrac Satin |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · 15 / 5 tests | 33 | 85 |
| Reviews found online | ≈ 66 (est.) | ≈ 66 (est.) |
Pilot Sport 5: 60% × 33.3 + 40% × 66.4 (est.) = 47
Ultrac Satin: 60% × 84.6 + 40% × 66.4 (est.) = 77
No owner ratings of noise for Pilot Sport 5 or Ultrac Satin. The owner half is the owners’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests, so the tests say nothing about how owners would rate it.
| Source | Pilot Sport 5 | Ultrac Satin |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · 6 / 1 tests | 92 | 70 |
| Reviews found online | 78 | 81 |
Pilot Sport 5: 60% × 92 + 40% × 77.9 = 86
Ultrac Satin: 60% × 69.7 + 40% × 80.7 = 74
| Source | Pilot Sport 5 | Ultrac Satin |
|---|---|---|
| Reviews found online | 89 | 85 |
| Source | Pilot Sport 5 | Ultrac Satin |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · 17 / 5 tests | 63 | 71 |
| Category | Michelin Pilot Sport 5 | Vredestein Ultrac Satin |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 86 | 76 |
| Dry | 92 | 67 |
| Wet | 94 | 80 |
| Comfort | 78 | 87 |
| Noise | 47 | 77 |
| Treadwear | 86 | 74 |
| Handling (owners) | 89 | 85 |
| Efficiency | 63 | 71 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Pilot Sport 5
Ultrac Satin
Per discipline: the average % of the best tire over every test both tires were in, and how many of those tests each one won. “Different tests” rows compare results from separate tests.
| Discipline | Category | Pilot Sport 5 | Ultrac Satin | Δ | Head-to-head |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dry Braking | Dry | 95% #10/50 · 2026 Summer Braking Super Tyre Test - How do 52 Tyres Perform in Wet and Dry Braking? | 92% #20/20 · 2020 Auto Zeitung Summer Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Dry Handling | Dry | 99% #4/4 · 2026 AutoView Value Sport Tyre Test | 98% #14/20 · 2020 Auto Zeitung Summer Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Dry Handling (tester's mark) | Dry | 100% #1/4 · 2026 AutoView Value Sport Tyre Test | 57% #14/20 · 2020 Auto Zeitung Summer Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Straight Aquaplaning | Wet | 94% #6/7 · Top Tire Review 2026 UHP Tyre Test: Big Brands vs Challengers | 100% #1/20 · 2020 Auto Zeitung Summer Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Wet Braking | Wet | 91% #9/50 · 2026 Summer Braking Super Tyre Test - How do 52 Tyres Perform in Wet and Dry Braking? | 93% #8/20 · 2020 Auto Zeitung Summer Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Wet Circle | Wet | 97% #5/7 · 2026 Sport Auto Summer Tyre Test | 98% #2/8 · 2020 Gute Fahrt SUV Summer Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Wet Handling | Wet | 98% #3/7 · Top Tire Review 2026 UHP Tyre Test: Big Brands vs Challengers | 95% #7/20 · 2020 Auto Zeitung Summer Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Wet Handling (tester's mark) | Wet | 100% #1/7 · Top Tire Review 2026 UHP Tyre Test: Big Brands vs Challengers | 58% #7/20 · 2020 Auto Zeitung Summer Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Comfort (tester's mark) | Comfort | 90% #4/4 · 2026 AutoView Value Sport Tyre Test | 100% #3/20 · 2020 Auto Zeitung Summer Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Noise | Noise | 99% #2/4 · 2026 AutoView Value Sport Tyre Test | 100% #2/20 · 2020 Auto Zeitung Summer Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Noise (tester's mark) | Noise | 87% #8/9 · 2025 Auto Express Summer Tyre Test | 100% #1/8 · 2020 Gute Fahrt SUV Summer Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Wear | Treadwear | 93% #2/20 · 2026 Autobild Summer Tyre Test | 71% #8/20 · 2017 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Rolling Resistance | Efficiency | 92% #3/7 · Top Tire Review 2026 UHP Tyre Test: Big Brands vs Challengers | 79% #9/20 · 2020 Auto Zeitung Summer Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Also published by the testers (not in the score) | |||||
| Price | Cost | 56% #13/13 · 2023 AutoBild Sports Car Summer Tyre Test | 62% #11/20 · 2020 Auto Zeitung Summer Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Overall Ranking | Overall | #9/50 2026 Summer Braking Super Tyre Test - How do 52 Tyres Perform in Wet and Dry Braking? | #6/8 2021 Gute Fahrt Summer Tire Test R18 | – | Different tests |
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score
Community sentiment towards the Michelin Pilot Sport 5 is largely positive, with drivers frequently praising its outstanding wet grip, daily driving comfort, and impressive tread life. While widely recommended as a dependable, premium all-round performance tire, some enthusiasts criticize it for having a slightly numb steering feel, softer sidewalls, and poor heat resistance during track use compared to more aggressive alternatives.
“Tyres: Ps5’s initial impression Tyres seem to be a common question across a few forums so I thought ide share. So after 12 months (27,000kms) with my i20n, I was (over) due to replace my tyres. While I loved the p-zeros, I wasn’t keen on the short life, so went with the pilot sport 5. My impressions as follows: Initial impression: a lot less road noise than the p-zero City drive: no noticeable difference (apart from the reduced noise) Highway drive: handling is not noticeably changed, but the reduced noise is really appreciated here! Twisty’s: the difference here is notable, ps5’s don’t provide quite the same aggressive limitless grip feel as the p-zeros. Still holds the line perfectly but noted a bit of slip on the inside front wheel under heavy throttle. I do approx 100km on back roads commuting to and from work every day, so I’ll update this thread if I find anything worth reporting Read more”
“PS5 is a very good allround, comfortable but grippy tire. PS4S has a stiffer sidewall and is way sportier but harsher. There is to date no successor for the PS4S. I switched from PS4S to PS5 on my mustang and its a way better fit for a daily tire. I would remommend to get PS5 for the rear aswell.”
“Anyone else greatly disappointed with their Michelin Pilot sport 5? My 10th anniversary recently got a set of 16 inch ND wheels (due to better tires being available on 16s) and a set of brand new PS5s. It’s on the original bilstein suspension with H&R sway bars and poly bushings all around. After having driven the PS5s for around 4k km i have to say i really don’t like them most of the time. Pros: They’re numb, which is amazing for highway driving. You really can’t feel anything from the tires and they’re super quiet. Cons: They’re numb. I literally can’t feel what they’re doing, they just don’t give any useable feedback from the road and the main thing i do is spirited driving. They also overheat extremely fast? I take five to six quicker turns and on the next turn in the entire car is just sliding around doing whatever the fuck it wants all while there still being no feedback whatsoever.. I’m frustrated af because i thought i’d treat myself to a good nice quality set of tires for once and thats the result.. I have driven on Kumho PS71s for i think a thousand km’s last year and they were waaay grippier and gave very good feedback. The car just isn’t as fun to drive now and it sucks hard. Rant over, thanks for listening. Tldr: Tyre bad :(”
Based on 173 community posts
We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.
| Attribute | A · Michelin Pilot Sport 5 | B · Vredestein Ultrac Satin |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer | Summer |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | 66 | 52 |
| Rim diameters | 16″ – 22″ | 16″ – 20″ |
| UTQG | 320 - 340 A - B A | — |
| Sizes in common | 29 | 29 |
Michelin Pilot Sport 5
Vredestein Ultrac Satin
Winner: Michelin Pilot Sport 5 — better dry, wet and treadwear. Pick the Vredestein Ultrac Satin if noise, comfort and efficiency matter most to you.
Vredestein Ultrac Satin scores 77 vs 47 on noise.
Michelin Pilot Sport 5 scores 92 vs 67 on dry.
Michelin Pilot Sport 5 scores 94 vs 80 on wet.
Michelin Pilot Sport 5 scores 86 vs 74 on treadwear.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Michelin Pilot Sport 5, 94 vs 80 on our wet score.
Michelin Pilot Sport 5, 92 vs 67 on our dry score.
Vredestein Ultrac Satin, 77 vs 47 on our noise score.
Vredestein Ultrac Satin, 87 vs 78 on our comfort score.
Michelin Pilot Sport 5, 86 vs 74 on our treadwear score.
Vredestein Ultrac Satin, 71 vs 63 on our efficiency score.
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology