Head-to-head Updated

Michelin Pilot Sport 5 vs Vredestein Ultrac Vorti+ — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 23 + 4 road tests and 6,538 + 61 owner reviews. How we score

Pilot Sport 5 is ahead, 86–74

Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Michelin Pilot Sport 5
Tire AMichelin

Pilot Sport 5

Summer

± 4

Tests 86 · 23 tests Owners 87 · 6,538 reviews

Best test result: #1 of 20 in 2026 Autobild Summer Tyre Test (dry handling (tester's mark))

“Put some 235/45 R17 ps5’s on my 9-5 They fill up the arches quite nice!”

Vredestein Ultrac Vorti+

Ultrac Vorti+

Summer

± 6

Tests 76 · 4 tests Owners 74 · 61 reviews

Best test result: #1 of 11 in 2022 AutoBild Sports Cars UHP Summer Tyre Test (wet handling)

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 92

    Dry

    Pilot Sport 5 +16
    76
    Why this score
    SourcePilot Sport 5Ultrac Vorti+
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 23 / 4 tests9375
    Reviews found online9077
    Dry Braking (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 1–097%92%

    Pilot Sport 5: 60% × 93.2 + 40% × 90.2 = 92

    Ultrac Vorti+: 60% × 75.2 + 40% × 77.4 = 76

  2. 94

    Wet

    Pilot Sport 5 +15
    79
    Why this score
    SourcePilot Sport 5Ultrac Vorti+
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 23 / 4 tests9480
    Reviews found online9377
    Wet Braking (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 1–095%84%

    Pilot Sport 5: 60% × 93.7 + 40% × 93.3 = 94

    Ultrac Vorti+: 60% × 79.9 + 40% × 77.1 = 79

  3. 78

    Comfort

    Pilot Sport 5 +11
    67
    Why this score
    SourcePilot Sport 5Ultrac Vorti+
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 9 / – tests71≈ 68 (est.)
    Reviews found online8366

    Pilot Sport 5: 40% × 70.9 + 60% × 83.4 = 78

    Ultrac Vorti+: 40% × 68.2 (est.) + 60% × 66.2 = 67

    No road tests of comfort for Ultrac Vorti+. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).

  4. 47

    Noise

    Ultrac Vorti+ +20
    67
    Why this score
    SourcePilot Sport 5Ultrac Vorti+
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 15 / 3 tests3367
    Reviews found online≈ 66 (est.)≈ 66 (est.)

    Pilot Sport 5: 60% × 33.3 + 40% × 66.3 (est.) = 47

    Ultrac Vorti+: 60% × 67.5 + 40% × 66.3 (est.) = 67

    No owner ratings of noise for Pilot Sport 5 or Ultrac Vorti+. The owner half is the owners’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests, so the tests say nothing about how owners would rate it.

  5. 86

    Treadwear

    Pilot Sport 5 +18
    68
    Why this score
    SourcePilot Sport 5Ultrac Vorti+
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 6 / – tests92≈ 67 (est.)
    Reviews found online7868

    Pilot Sport 5: 60% × 92 + 40% × 77.9 = 86

    Ultrac Vorti+: 60% × 67.2 (est.) + 40% × 68.4 = 68

    No road tests of treadwear for Ultrac Vorti+. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).

  6. 89

    Handling (owners)

    Pilot Sport 5 +11
    78
    Why this score
    SourcePilot Sport 5Ultrac Vorti+
    Reviews found online8978
  7. 63

    Efficiency

    Pilot Sport 5 +28
    35
    Why this score
    SourcePilot Sport 5Ultrac Vorti+
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 17 / 3 tests6335
Scores at a glance
Michelin Pilot Sport 5 vs Vredestein Ultrac Vorti+: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryMichelin Pilot Sport 5Vredestein Ultrac Vorti+
Relative Score 86 74
Dry 92 76
Wet 94 79
Comfort 78 67
Noise 47 67
Treadwear 86 68
Handling (owners) 89 78
Efficiency 63 35

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Not important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score
± 4

Pilot Sport 5

± 6

Ultrac Vorti+

The professional test results behind the scores

Per discipline: the average % of the best tire over every test both tires were in, and how many of those tests each one won. “Different tests” rows compare results from separate tests.

In the overall rankings of 1 tests that ran both, Michelin Pilot Sport 5 finished ahead 1 times and Vredestein Ultrac Vorti+ 0 times.

DisciplineCategoryPilot Sport 5Ultrac Vorti+ΔHead-to-head
Dry Braking Dry 97% 92% +5.4 1–0 in 1 shared test Newest: 2023 Summer Tyre Market Overview · 225/45 R18
Wet Braking Wet 95% 84% +11.3 1–0 in 1 shared test Newest: 2023 Summer Tyre Market Overview · 225/45 R18
Also published by the testers (not in the score)
Overall Ranking Overall #6/48 #29/48 – 1–0 in 1 shared test Newest: 2023 Summer Tyre Market Overview · 225/45 R18

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Pilot Sport 5

Pros

  • Outstanding wet and dry traction with high resistance to aquaplaning
  • Superior tread life and longevity compared to competitors and previous generations
  • Noticeable improvements in ride comfort and a quieter cabin over rough road surfaces

Cons

  • Softer sidewalls can lead to initial steering vagueness or understeer during hard cornering
  • Higher price point compared to some tier-one competitors
  • Performance and grip degrade significantly under intense track heat or heavy circuit use
All owner themes in the Pilot Sport 5 review

Tire B Ultrac Vorti+

Pros

  • Strong dry grip and sharp, communicative handling, including under hard driving and track use
  • Good wet grip and braking reported by many users, including in storms and floods
  • Improved comfort and reduced road noise compared with previous tires such as Pirelli P Zero runflats and Uniroyal RainSport

Cons

  • Wet performance is not class-leading for some users, who found it less secure than Michelin Pilot Sport 5 or other tires they had used
  • Poor grip in snow, as expected of a summer-oriented tire
  • Possibly slightly reduced cornering grip compared with a previous tire, according to one reviewer
All owner themes in the Ultrac Vorti+ review

What real owners are saying

From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score

Tire A

Michelin Pilot Sport 5

Positive

Community sentiment towards the Michelin Pilot Sport 5 is largely positive, with drivers frequently praising its outstanding wet grip, daily driving comfort, and impressive tread life. While widely recommended as a dependable, premium all-round performance tire, some enthusiasts criticize it for having a slightly numb steering feel, softer sidewalls, and poor heat resistance during track use compared to more aggressive alternatives.

f30.bimmerpost.com

“I've used the PS4S, potenza s001's & sports contact 7. Currently on Pilot Sport 5's and I think they're the best all road "do it all"road tyre I've had on my RWD . The asymmetric 6 is also supposed to be great but I havent tried that.”

r/CarsAustralia ·8 upvotes ·2025-09-10

“In my experience they are quite long wearing tires and well worth the cost. I used to get around 40k out of most tyres. My first set of ps4’s lasted 55k and now the ps5’s are trending to beat it. I'm a pretty spirited driver around the roundabouts of Canberra too, though I only have a hatch so experiences may vary. As to performance I've driven them on my i30 n-line and other people’s i30N, BRZ, tesla 3, and stinger and the tyres have more grip than I have guts to push them on public roads. In both wet and dry they are very confidence inspiring and a hell of a lot of fun.”

r/TeslaUK ·3 upvotes ·2026-03-27

“Pilot sport 5? Hi, after replacement tyres for M3. Just touched 30k miles and all 4 need doing. Michelin 235/45 ZR18 (98Y) XL TL PILOT SPORT 5 I was looking at these 154 pounds from Costco. Only they’re not T rated. Was comparing them with the original 235/45 ZR 18 PILOT SPORT 4 XL TO TESLA these are 204 pounds at Costco. Thoughts on whether the PS5 will be ok please? Visited a couple of independent tyre shops yesterday, 1 quoted budget 100 each through to PS4s at 230 each. The second wouldn’t quote on non Tesla approved, so just quoted the PS4 T0s at 203 each. Cheers”

Top themes
#wet grip performance#tread life longevity#daily driving comfort#track heat delamination#premium pricing comparisons#road noise levels#steering feel feedback

Based on 173 community posts

Tire B

Vredestein Ultrac Vorti+

We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Michelin Pilot Sport 5 B · Vredestein Ultrac Vorti+
CategorySummerSummer
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover
Sizes available6665
Rim diameters16″ – 22″18″ – 22″
UTQG320 - 340 A - B A—
Sizes in common3232

Which one should you actually buy?

Michelin Pilot Sport 5

Vredestein Ultrac Vorti+

Winner: Michelin Pilot Sport 5 — better efficiency, treadwear and dry. Pick the Vredestein Ultrac Vorti+ if noise matters most to you.

Pick tire A You want lower fuel or energy use

Michelin Pilot Sport 5 scores 63 vs 35 on efficiency.

Pick tire B You want a quieter cabin

Vredestein Ultrac Vorti+ scores 67 vs 47 on noise.

Pick tire A You want the longest tread life

Michelin Pilot Sport 5 scores 86 vs 68 on treadwear.

Pick tire A You want the most grip on dry roads

Michelin Pilot Sport 5 scores 92 vs 76 on dry.

Tire A · Michelin Pilot Sport 5
Tire B · Vredestein Ultrac Vorti+

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Pilot Sport 5 or Ultrac Vorti+?

Which is better in the wet, Pilot Sport 5 or Ultrac Vorti+?

Michelin Pilot Sport 5, 94 vs 79 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, Pilot Sport 5 or Ultrac Vorti+?

Michelin Pilot Sport 5, 92 vs 76 on our dry score.

Which is quieter, Pilot Sport 5 or Ultrac Vorti+?

Vredestein Ultrac Vorti+, 67 vs 47 on our noise score.

Which is more comfortable, Pilot Sport 5 or Ultrac Vorti+?

Michelin Pilot Sport 5, 78 vs 67 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, Pilot Sport 5 or Ultrac Vorti+?

Michelin Pilot Sport 5, 86 vs 68 on our treadwear score.

Which rolls more easily, Pilot Sport 5 or Ultrac Vorti+?

Michelin Pilot Sport 5, 63 vs 35 on our efficiency score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology