Head-to-head Updated

Michelin Pilot Sport 5 vs Vredestein Ultrac Vorti+ — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 23 + 4 road tests and 6,449 + 60 owner reviews. How we score

Pilot Sport 5 is ahead, 87–73

Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Michelin Pilot Sport 5
Tire AMichelin

Pilot Sport 5

Summer

± 4

Tests 86 · 23 tests Owners 88 · 6,449 reviews

Best test result: #1 of 20 in 2026 Autobild Summer Tyre Test (dry handling (tester's mark))

“Put some 235/45 R17 ps5’s on my 9-5 They fill up the arches quite nice!”

Vredestein Ultrac Vorti+

Ultrac Vorti+

Summer

± 6

Tests 76 · 4 tests Owners 70 · 60 reviews

Best test result: #1 of 11 in 2022 AutoBild Sports Cars UHP Summer Tyre Test (wet handling)

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 92

    Dry

    Pilot Sport 5 +17
    75
    Why this score
    SourcePilot Sport 5Ultrac Vorti+
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 23 / 4 tests9375
    Reviews found online9175
    Dry Braking (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 1–097%92%

    Pilot Sport 5: 60% × 92.9 + 40% × 90.8 = 92

    Ultrac Vorti+: 60% × 75.1 + 40% × 74.5 = 75

  2. 94

    Wet

    Pilot Sport 5 +16
    78
    Why this score
    SourcePilot Sport 5Ultrac Vorti+
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 23 / 4 tests9480
    Reviews found online9474
    Wet Braking (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 1–095%84%

    Pilot Sport 5: 60% × 94.1 + 40% × 93.6 = 94

    Ultrac Vorti+: 60% × 80.2 + 40% × 73.6 = 78

  3. 79

    Comfort

    Pilot Sport 5 +14
    65
    Why this score
    SourcePilot Sport 5Ultrac Vorti+
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 9 / – tests71≈ 68 (est.)
    Reviews found online8563

    Pilot Sport 5: 40% × 71 + 60% × 84.8 = 79

    Ultrac Vorti+: 40% × 67.9 (est.) + 60% × 62.7 = 65

    No road tests of comfort for Ultrac Vorti+. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.

  4. 47

    Noise

    Ultrac Vorti+ +20
    67
    Why this score
    SourcePilot Sport 5Ultrac Vorti+
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 15 / 3 tests3367
    Reviews found online≈ 67 (est.)≈ 67 (est.)

    Pilot Sport 5: 60% × 33.2 + 40% × 66.6 (est.) = 47

    Ultrac Vorti+: 60% × 67.4 + 40% × 66.6 (est.) = 67

    No owner ratings of noise for Pilot Sport 5 or Ultrac Vorti+. The owner half is the owners’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests, so the tests say nothing about how owners would rate it.

  5. 87

    Treadwear

    Pilot Sport 5 +22
    65
    Why this score
    SourcePilot Sport 5Ultrac Vorti+
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 6 / – tests92≈ 65 (est.)
    Reviews found online7964

    Pilot Sport 5: 60% × 91.9 + 40% × 78.9 = 87

    Ultrac Vorti+: 60% × 65.4 (est.) + 40% × 64.1 = 65

    No road tests of treadwear for Ultrac Vorti+. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).

  6. 89

    Handling (owners)

    Pilot Sport 5 +13
    76
    Why this score
    SourcePilot Sport 5Ultrac Vorti+
    Reviews found online8976
  7. 64

    Efficiency

    Pilot Sport 5 +28
    36
    Why this score
    SourcePilot Sport 5Ultrac Vorti+
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 17 / 3 tests6436
Scores at a glance
Michelin Pilot Sport 5 vs Vredestein Ultrac Vorti+: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryMichelin Pilot Sport 5Vredestein Ultrac Vorti+
Relative Score 87 73
Dry 92 75
Wet 94 78
Comfort 79 65
Noise 47 67
Treadwear 87 65
Handling (owners) 89 76
Efficiency 64 36

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Not important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score
± 4

Pilot Sport 5

± 6

Ultrac Vorti+

The professional test results behind the scores

Per discipline: the average % of the best tire over every test both tires were in, and how many of those tests each one won. “Different tests” rows compare results from separate tests.

In the overall rankings of 1 tests that ran both, Michelin Pilot Sport 5 finished ahead 1 times and Vredestein Ultrac Vorti+ 0 times.

DisciplineCategoryPilot Sport 5Ultrac Vorti+ΔHead-to-head
Dry Braking Dry 97% 92% +5.4 1–0 in 1 shared test Newest: 2023 Summer Tyre Market Overview · 225/45 R18
Wet Braking Wet 95% 84% +11.3 1–0 in 1 shared test Newest: 2023 Summer Tyre Market Overview · 225/45 R18
Also published by the testers (not in the score)
Overall Ranking Overall #6/48 #29/48 – 1–0 in 1 shared test Newest: 2023 Summer Tyre Market Overview · 225/45 R18

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Pilot Sport 5

Pros

  • Outstanding wet and dry traction with high resistance to aquaplaning
  • Superior tread life and longevity compared to competitors and previous generations
  • Noticeable improvements in ride comfort and a quieter cabin over rough road surfaces

Cons

  • Softer sidewalls can lead to initial steering vagueness or understeer during hard cornering
  • Higher price point compared to some tier-one competitors
  • Performance and grip degrade significantly under intense track heat or heavy circuit use
All owner themes in the Pilot Sport 5 review

Tire B Ultrac Vorti+

Pros

  • Significantly better ride comfort and reduced road noise compared to run-flat tires
  • Excellent wet handling and dependable traction in heavy rain
  • Balanced dry grip and improved steering response

Cons

  • Subpar grip performance in snow and winter conditions
  • Potentially quicker rear tread wear under aggressive driving
  • Slightly reduced cornering grip compared to specialized rain-oriented tires
All owner themes in the Ultrac Vorti+ review

What real owners are saying

From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score

Tire A

Michelin Pilot Sport 5

Positive

Community opinion on the Michelin Pilot Sport 5 is overwhelmingly positive for daily street driving, praising its exceptional wet grip, tread longevity, and quiet comfort compared to run-flats and older performance tires. However, several enthusiasts note downsides for aggressive or track use, specifically citing softer sidewalls, muted steering feedback, and poor heat resistance leading to delamination under track conditions. Most drivers consider it an outstanding premium all-rounder for sporty street cars rather than a dedicated track or extreme-performance tire.

r/AudiA5 ·1 upvote ·2026-04-30

“I had PS5’s on they were great literally all the grip you could ever want (not a very powerful car) and they have an incredibly long life span, I didn’t find them loud at all and i also now have an Audi a5 coupe and the car itself blocks out most noise especially if you have music on so it’s not something you should worry about, I know the Asym6 have more grip but it’s marginal I’d personally get the ps5’s just because of the beautiful side wall!”

bimmerforums.co.uk ·1 upvote ·2024-05-06

“look at camskill,always the cheapest,ive just gotten the michelin ps5 for my M4 ,not fitted yet as my conti sport 7 still have life,only bought last month as there was a cashback offer from michelin at camskill,i got £80 so got 2 x 275-35-19 and x2 255-35-19 for £617 delivered,”

r/Miata ·2 upvotes ·2026-05-13

“Anyone else greatly disappointed with their Michelin Pilot sport 5? My 10th anniversary recently got a set of 16 inch ND wheels (due to better tires being available on 16s) and a set of brand new PS5s. It’s on the original bilstein suspension with H&R sway bars and poly bushings all around. After having driven the PS5s for around 4k km i have to say i really don’t like them most of the time. Pros: They’re numb, which is amazing for highway driving. You really can’t feel anything from the tires and they’re super quiet. Cons: They’re numb. I literally can’t feel what they’re doing, they just don’t give any useable feedback from the road and the main thing i do is spirited driving. They also overheat extremely fast? I take five to six quicker turns and on the next turn in the entire car is just sliding around doing whatever the fuck it wants all while there still being no feedback whatsoever.. I’m frustrated af because i thought i’d treat myself to a good nice quality set of tires for once and thats the result.. I have driven on Kumho PS71s for i think a thousand km’s last year and they were waaay grippier and gave very good feedback. The car just isn’t as fun to drive now and it sucks hard. Rant over, thanks for listening. Tldr: Tyre bad :(”

Top themes
#wet grip performance#tread wear longevity#daily driving comfort#track heat delamination#soft sidewall steering feedback#road noise levels#comparison with ps4s

Based on 174 community posts

Tire B

Vredestein Ultrac Vorti+

We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Michelin Pilot Sport 5 B · Vredestein Ultrac Vorti+
CategorySummerSummer
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover
Sizes available6665
Rim diameters16″ – 22″18″ – 22″
Sizes in common3232

Which one should you actually buy?

Michelin Pilot Sport 5

Vredestein Ultrac Vorti+

Winner: Michelin Pilot Sport 5 — better efficiency, treadwear and dry. Pick the Vredestein Ultrac Vorti+ if noise matters most to you.

Pick tire A You want lower fuel or energy use

Michelin Pilot Sport 5 scores 64 vs 36 on efficiency.

Pick tire A You want the longest tread life

Michelin Pilot Sport 5 scores 87 vs 65 on treadwear.

Pick tire B You want a quieter cabin

Vredestein Ultrac Vorti+ scores 67 vs 47 on noise.

Pick tire A You want the most grip on dry roads

Michelin Pilot Sport 5 scores 92 vs 75 on dry.

Tire A · Michelin Pilot Sport 5
Tire B · Vredestein Ultrac Vorti+

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Pilot Sport 5 or Ultrac Vorti+?

Which is better in the wet, Pilot Sport 5 or Ultrac Vorti+?

Michelin Pilot Sport 5, 94 vs 78 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, Pilot Sport 5 or Ultrac Vorti+?

Michelin Pilot Sport 5, 92 vs 75 on our dry score.

Which is quieter, Pilot Sport 5 or Ultrac Vorti+?

Vredestein Ultrac Vorti+, 67 vs 47 on our noise score.

Which is more comfortable, Pilot Sport 5 or Ultrac Vorti+?

Michelin Pilot Sport 5, 79 vs 65 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, Pilot Sport 5 or Ultrac Vorti+?

Michelin Pilot Sport 5, 87 vs 65 on our treadwear score.

Which rolls more easily, Pilot Sport 5 or Ultrac Vorti+?

Michelin Pilot Sport 5, 64 vs 36 on our efficiency score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology