Head-to-head Updated

Michelin Pilot Sport A/S 3 vs Yokohama ADVAN Sport — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 7 + 46 owner reviews. How we score

Pilot Sport A/S 3 is ahead, 76–52

Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 77

    Dry

    Pilot Sport A/S 3 +23
    54
    Why this score
    SourcePilot Sport A/S 3ADVAN Sport
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 74 (est.)≈ 59 (est.)
    Reviews found online8247

    Pilot Sport A/S 3: 60% × 73.6 (est.) + 40% × 81.8 = 77

    ADVAN Sport: 60% × 59.3 (est.) + 40% × 46.8 = 54

    No road tests of dry for Pilot Sport A/S 3. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).

    No road tests of dry for ADVAN Sport. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).

  2. 80

    Wet

    Pilot Sport A/S 3 +22
    58
    Why this score
    SourcePilot Sport A/S 3ADVAN Sport
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 78 (est.)≈ 61 (est.)
    Reviews found online8453

    Pilot Sport A/S 3: 60% × 77.8 (est.) + 40% × 83.8 = 80

    ADVAN Sport: 60% × 61 (est.) + 40% × 53 = 58

    No road tests of wet for Pilot Sport A/S 3. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

    No road tests of wet for ADVAN Sport. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

  3. 71

    Snow

    Pilot Sport A/S 3 +11
    60
    Why this score
    SourcePilot Sport A/S 3ADVAN Sport
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 71 (est.)≈ 65 (est.)
    Reviews found online7152

    Pilot Sport A/S 3: 60% × 70.8 (est.) + 40% × 71.2 = 71

    ADVAN Sport: 60% × 64.7 (est.) + 40% × 52.4 = 60

    No road tests of snow for Pilot Sport A/S 3. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).

    No road tests of snow for ADVAN Sport. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).

  4. 70

    Comfort

    Pilot Sport A/S 3 +26
    44
    Why this score
    SourcePilot Sport A/S 3ADVAN Sport
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 69 (est.)≈ 62 (est.)
    Reviews found online7133

    Pilot Sport A/S 3: 40% × 69.1 (est.) + 60% × 70.6 = 70

    ADVAN Sport: 40% × 61.5 (est.) + 60% × 33 = 44

    No road tests of comfort for Pilot Sport A/S 3. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).

    No road tests of comfort for ADVAN Sport. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).

  5. –

    Noise

    No comparison
    60
    Why this score
    SourcePilot Sport A/S 3ADVAN Sport
    Professional tests (TWG score)–≈ 66 (est.)
    Reviews found online–52

    ADVAN Sport: 60% × 66.5 (est.) + 40% × 51.5 = 60

    No road tests of noise for ADVAN Sport. The test half is the tested tires’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.

  6. 70

    Treadwear

    Pilot Sport A/S 3 +29
    41
    Why this score
    SourcePilot Sport A/S 3ADVAN Sport
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 68 (est.)≈ 52 (est.)
    Reviews found online7225

    Pilot Sport A/S 3: 60% × 68.4 (est.) + 40% × 71.6 = 70

    ADVAN Sport: 60% × 51.7 (est.) + 40% × 25.2 = 41

    No road tests of treadwear for Pilot Sport A/S 3. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).

    No road tests of treadwear for ADVAN Sport. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).

  7. 81

    Handling (owners)

    Pilot Sport A/S 3 +37
    44
    Why this score
    SourcePilot Sport A/S 3ADVAN Sport
    Reviews found online8144
Scores at a glance
Michelin Pilot Sport A/S 3 vs Yokohama ADVAN Sport: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryMichelin Pilot Sport A/S 3Yokohama ADVAN Sport
Relative Score 76 52
Dry 77 54
Wet 80 58
Snow 71 60
Comfort 70 44
Noise – 60
Treadwear 70 41
Handling (owners) 81 44

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score
± 8

Pilot Sport A/S 3

± 8

ADVAN Sport

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Pilot Sport A/S 3

Pros

  • Exceptional grip in both wet and dry weather conditions
  • Outstanding cornering stability and steering responsiveness
  • Stiff sidewalls providing superior handling compared to competitors

Cons

  • Noticeable and bothersome road noise
  • Heavy tire construction
  • Shorter than expected tread life for certain drivers on abrasive surfaces
All owner themes in the Pilot Sport A/S 3 review

Tire B ADVAN Sport

Pros

  • Exceptional dry grip and handling performance
  • Precise steering response and excellent road feedback
  • Predictable behavior when pushed near the limit

Cons

  • Unacceptably high and intrusive road noise
  • Very rapid tread wear with many reporting early replacement under 10,000 miles
  • Stiff, harsh ride quality
All owner themes in the ADVAN Sport review

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Michelin Pilot Sport A/S 3 B · Yokohama ADVAN Sport
CategoryAll SeasonSummer
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover
Sizes available63
Rim diameters19″ – 20″19″ – 20″
Tread depth—10/32″
UTQG500 AA A180 A A
Sidewall—Blackwall
Max pressure—50 psi
Sizes in common11

Which one should you actually buy?

Michelin Pilot Sport A/S 3

Yokohama ADVAN Sport

Winner: Michelin Pilot Sport A/S 3 — better handling, treadwear and comfort. It leads or ties in every category we score. Michelin Pilot Sport A/S 3 rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 7 reviews), so read this result as provisional.

Pick tire A You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Michelin Pilot Sport A/S 3 scores 81 vs 44 on handling.

Pick tire A You want the longest tread life

Michelin Pilot Sport A/S 3 scores 70 vs 41 on treadwear.

Pick tire A You want the most comfortable ride

Michelin Pilot Sport A/S 3 scores 70 vs 44 on comfort.

Pick tire A You want the most grip on dry roads

Michelin Pilot Sport A/S 3 scores 77 vs 54 on dry.

Tire A · Michelin Pilot Sport A/S 3
Tire B · Yokohama ADVAN Sport

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Pilot Sport A/S 3 or ADVAN Sport?

Which is better in the wet, Pilot Sport A/S 3 or ADVAN Sport?

Michelin Pilot Sport A/S 3, 80 vs 58 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, Pilot Sport A/S 3 or ADVAN Sport?

Michelin Pilot Sport A/S 3, 77 vs 54 on our dry score.

Which is better in snow, Pilot Sport A/S 3 or ADVAN Sport?

Michelin Pilot Sport A/S 3, 71 vs 60 on our snow score.

Which is more comfortable, Pilot Sport A/S 3 or ADVAN Sport?

Michelin Pilot Sport A/S 3, 70 vs 44 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, Pilot Sport A/S 3 or ADVAN Sport?

Michelin Pilot Sport A/S 3, 70 vs 41 on our treadwear score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology