Head-to-head Updated

Michelin Pilot Sport Cup 2 R vs Avon AS7 Gen 2 — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 2 + 1 road tests and 4 + 7 owner reviews. How we score

Too close to call: Pilot Sport Cup 2 R 64, AS7 Gen 2 63.

Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Michelin Pilot Sport Cup 2 R
± 7

Tests 63 · 2 tests Owners 63 · 4 reviews

Best test result: #2 of 6 in The BEST Track Day Tyres for 2024 (dry braking)

Avon AS7 Gen 2
Tire BAvon

AS7 Gen 2

All Season

± 7Provisional

Tests 68 · 1 test Owners 58 · 7 reviews

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 77

    Dry

    Pilot Sport Cup 2 R +8
    69
    Why this score
    SourcePilot Sport Cup 2 RAS7 Gen 2
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 2 / 1 tests7975
    Reviews found online7461

    Pilot Sport Cup 2 R: 60% × 79.3 + 40% × 73.6 = 77

    AS7 Gen 2: 60% × 74.7 + 40% × 60.8 = 69

  2. 53

    Wet

    AS7 Gen 2 +10
    63
    Why this score
    SourcePilot Sport Cup 2 RAS7 Gen 2
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 2 / 1 tests4661
    Reviews found online6367

    Pilot Sport Cup 2 R: 60% × 46 + 40% × 63.1 = 53

    AS7 Gen 2: 60% × 61.3 + 40% × 66.6 = 63

  3. –

    Snow

    No comparison
    61
    Why this score
    SourcePilot Sport Cup 2 RAS7 Gen 2
    Professional tests (TWG score)–≈ 65 (est.)
    Reviews found online–54

    AS7 Gen 2: 60% × 65.4 (est.) + 40% × 54.1 = 61

    No road tests of snow for AS7 Gen 2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).

  4. 70

    Comfort

    Pilot Sport Cup 2 R +12
    58
    Why this score
    SourcePilot Sport Cup 2 RAS7 Gen 2
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 69 (est.)≈ 65 (est.)
    Reviews found online7153

    Pilot Sport Cup 2 R: 40% × 69.2 (est.) + 60% × 71 = 70

    AS7 Gen 2: 40% × 65.5 (est.) + 60% × 52.7 = 58

    No road tests of comfort for Pilot Sport Cup 2 R. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).

    No road tests of comfort for AS7 Gen 2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).

  5. 54

    Treadwear

    AS7 Gen 2 +3
    57
    Why this score
    SourcePilot Sport Cup 2 RAS7 Gen 2
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 59 (est.)≈ 61 (est.)
    Reviews found online4651

    Pilot Sport Cup 2 R: 60% × 59.1 (est.) + 40% × 45.7 = 54

    AS7 Gen 2: 60% × 61.1 (est.) + 40% × 51.4 = 57

    No road tests of treadwear for Pilot Sport Cup 2 R. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).

    No road tests of treadwear for AS7 Gen 2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).

  6. 73

    Handling (owners)

    Pilot Sport Cup 2 R +18
    55
    Why this score
    SourcePilot Sport Cup 2 RAS7 Gen 2
    Reviews found online7355
Scores at a glance
Michelin Pilot Sport Cup 2 R vs Avon AS7 Gen 2: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryMichelin Pilot Sport Cup 2 RAvon AS7 Gen 2
Relative Score 64 63
Dry 77 69
Wet 53 63
Snow – 61
Comfort 70 58
Treadwear 54 57
Handling (owners) 73 55

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score
± 7

Pilot Sport Cup 2 R

± 7

AS7 Gen 2

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

The professional test results behind the scores

Per discipline: the average % of the best tire over every test both tires were in, and how many of those tests each one won. “Different tests” rows compare results from separate tests.

DisciplineCategoryPilot Sport Cup 2 RAS7 Gen 2ΔHead-to-head
Dry Braking Dry 96% #2/5 · 2026 AutoBild Track Day Tyre Test 92% #5/32 · 2021 All Season Tyre Market Overview – Different tests
Wet Braking Wet 85% #5/5 · 2026 AutoBild Track Day Tyre Test 84% #29/32 · 2021 All Season Tyre Market Overview – Different tests
Also published by the testers (not in the score)
Overall Ranking Overall #5/5 2026 AutoBild Track Day Tyre Test #23/32 2021 All Season Tyre Market Overview – Different tests

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Pilot Sport Cup 2 R

Pros

  • Phenomenal dry grip providing a planted and confident feel on the track
  • Optimized design specifically for extracting maximum performance during time attacks
  • Superior circuit performance compared to the standard Pilot Sport Cup 2

Cons

  • Extremely limited performance longevity, with grip dropping off rapidly after just a few laps
  • Poor performance and safety risks in damp to wet conditions due to shallow and narrow tread patterns
  • Best suited strictly for single-lap time trials rather than extended track sessions
All owner themes in the Pilot Sport Cup 2 R review

Tire B AS7 Gen 2

Pros

  • Commendable grip and braking performance in dry and heavy wet conditions
  • Good wear characteristics reported on certain vehicles like the Subaru Forester and Peugeot 207
  • Improves or maintains fuel economy for some drivers compared to previous fitments

Cons

  • Noticeable tread noise on rougher tarmac surfaces
  • Rapid tread wear reported by some users, leading to premature replacement
  • Poor grip and unpredictable handling on mild damp roads, ice, and light snow
All owner themes in the AS7 Gen 2 review

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Michelin Pilot Sport Cup 2 R B · Avon AS7 Gen 2
CategorySummerAll Season
Vehicle typePassenger Car / Crossover—
Sizes available7—
Rim diameters20″ – 21″—
UTQG140 A - B A—

Which one should you actually buy?

Michelin Pilot Sport Cup 2 R

Avon AS7 Gen 2

Too close to call: Michelin Pilot Sport Cup 2 R and Avon AS7 Gen 2 are within 2 points overall. Michelin Pilot Sport Cup 2 R is stronger on handling, comfort and dry. Avon AS7 Gen 2 is stronger on wet and treadwear. Avon AS7 Gen 2 rests on little evidence so far (1 test, 7 reviews), so read this result as provisional.

Pick tire A You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Michelin Pilot Sport Cup 2 R scores 73 vs 55 on handling.

Pick tire A You want the most comfortable ride

Michelin Pilot Sport Cup 2 R scores 70 vs 58 on comfort.

Pick tire B Your priority is wet-weather safety

Avon AS7 Gen 2 scores 63 vs 53 on wet.

Pick tire A You want the most grip on dry roads

Michelin Pilot Sport Cup 2 R scores 77 vs 69 on dry.

Tire A · Michelin Pilot Sport Cup 2 R
Tire B · Avon AS7 Gen 2

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Pilot Sport Cup 2 R or AS7 Gen 2?

Which is better in the wet, Pilot Sport Cup 2 R or AS7 Gen 2?

Avon AS7 Gen 2, 63 vs 53 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, Pilot Sport Cup 2 R or AS7 Gen 2?

Michelin Pilot Sport Cup 2 R, 77 vs 69 on our dry score.

Which is more comfortable, Pilot Sport Cup 2 R or AS7 Gen 2?

Michelin Pilot Sport Cup 2 R, 70 vs 58 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, Pilot Sport Cup 2 R or AS7 Gen 2?

Avon AS7 Gen 2, 57 vs 54 on our treadwear score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology