Head-to-head Updated

Michelin Pilot Sport PS2 vs Michelin Pilot Super Sport — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 1 road tests and 166 + 1,506 owner reviews. How we score

Too close to call: Pilot Sport PS2 79, Pilot Super Sport 78.

Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Michelin Pilot Super Sport
± 6

Tests 75 · 1 test Owners 82 · 1,506 reviews

Best test result: #1 of 9 in 2017 Motor Mag UHP Tyre Test (dry handling)

“Damn. 295s on Style 359Ms? That's pushing it a bit, isn't it? I so desperately wish Michelin would make a 285/30 PSS. I'm running 275/35s now, and while I like the extra rubber on the road, I don't like the increased sidewall height over the OEM 265/35.”

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 82

    Dry

    Pilot Super Sport +1
    83
    Why this score
    SourcePilot Sport PS2Pilot Super Sport
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests≈ 77 (est.)77
    Reviews found online9090

    Pilot Sport PS2: 60% × 77.3 (est.) + 40% × 90.1 = 82

    Pilot Super Sport: 60% × 77.4 + 40% × 90.3 = 83

    No road tests of dry for Pilot Sport PS2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).

  2. 81

    Wet

    Pilot Sport PS2 +4
    77
    Why this score
    SourcePilot Sport PS2Pilot Super Sport
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests≈ 79 (est.)73
    Reviews found online8584

    Pilot Sport PS2: 60% × 78.5 (est.) + 40% × 84.8 = 81

    Pilot Super Sport: 60% × 73.1 + 40% × 83.9 = 77

    No road tests of wet for Pilot Sport PS2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

  3. 76

    Comfort

    Pilot Sport PS2 +2
    74
    Why this score
    SourcePilot Sport PS2Pilot Super Sport
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 71 (est.)≈ 71 (est.)
    Reviews found online7977

    Pilot Sport PS2: 40% × 70.9 (est.) + 60% × 79.1 = 76

    Pilot Super Sport: 40% × 70.5 (est.) + 60% × 76.9 = 74

    No road tests of comfort for Pilot Sport PS2 or Pilot Super Sport. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.

  4. 67

    Treadwear

    Pilot Super Sport +3
    70
    Why this score
    SourcePilot Sport PS2Pilot Super Sport
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 67 (est.)≈ 68 (est.)
    Reviews found online6873

    Pilot Sport PS2: 60% × 66.7 (est.) + 40% × 67.9 = 67

    Pilot Super Sport: 60% × 68.4 (est.) + 40% × 72.7 = 70

    No road tests of treadwear for Pilot Sport PS2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).

    No road tests of treadwear for Pilot Super Sport. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).

  5. 85

    Handling (owners)

    Pilot Sport PS2 +2
    83
    Why this score
    SourcePilot Sport PS2Pilot Super Sport
    Reviews found online8583
Scores at a glance
Michelin Pilot Sport PS2 vs Michelin Pilot Super Sport: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryMichelin Pilot Sport PS2Michelin Pilot Super Sport
Relative Score 79 78
Dry 82 83
Wet 81 77
Comfort 76 74
Treadwear 67 70
Handling (owners) 85 83

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score
± 7

Pilot Sport PS2

± 6

Pilot Super Sport

The professional test results behind the scores

Per discipline: the average % of the best tire over every test both tires were in, and how many of those tests each one won. “Different tests” rows compare results from separate tests.

DisciplineCategoryPilot Sport PS2Pilot Super SportΔHead-to-head
Also published by the testers (not in the score)
Overall Ranking Overall #4/9 2010 EVO FWD Tyre Test #2/9 2017 Motor Mag UHP Tyre Test – Different tests

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Pilot Sport PS2

Pros

  • Outstanding dry grip and traction
  • Confident, predictable handling and progressive limit feedback
  • Excellent steering response and turn-in precision

Cons

  • High initial purchase price
  • Rapid tread wear, particularly on rear axles or under spirited driving
  • Reduced wet traction and potential for sudden breakaway as the tread wears down
All owner themes in the Pilot Sport PS2 review

Tire B Pilot Super Sport

Pros

  • Phenomenal dry grip and cornering stability
  • Precise steering response and excellent road feedback
  • Better-than-expected tread wear and mileage for a performance tire

Cons

  • Reduced grip and traction in cold weather (below 15°C)
  • Mediocre performance and tendency to aquaplane when tread wears down in heavy rain
  • High price point compared to some alternatives
All owner themes in the Pilot Super Sport review

What real owners are saying

From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score

Tire A

Michelin Pilot Sport PS2

We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.

Tire B

Michelin Pilot Super Sport

Positive

The Michelin Pilot Super Sport is widely praised by the community as a benchmark high-performance street tire offering outstanding dry grip, sharp cornering capability, and decent ride comfort for daily driving. Many drivers note that its successor, the Pilot Sport 4S, improves upon it—especially in cold and wet conditions—while several users highlight downsides such as poor winter/snow capability, premium pricing, and eventual rubber degradation or tread cracking as the tires age.

mbworld.org

“Another option would be Bridgestone RE-11 or Yokohama AD-08. Both have slightly more dry traction than the PSS. The big advantage of both of these in my experience is that they have a much stiffer sidewall than the PSS. The assists with response and much less roll over which on heavier cars (like the C63 or my current M3) makes a noticeable improvement. The downside is a slightly stiffer ride, especially on the AD-08. The RE-11 are only a slight trade off in comfort for the advantages noted above. Oh yeah, PSS have better tread wear too For street driving, the PSS are the best. If the car sees track time, I would personally lean towards RE-11. I ran both on my M3 and enjoyed the steering response and grip improvement of the RE-11 over the PSS but mainly because I get out several times a year to the track. When my C63 arrives, I will swap out the wheels (and use them for winter wheels), sell the OEM tires and put after market wheels and RE-11 tires on the car.”

r/BMW ·1 upvote ·2014-01-22

“Damn. 295s on Style 359Ms? That's pushing it a bit, isn't it? I so desperately wish Michelin would make a 285/30 PSS. I'm running 275/35s now, and while I like the extra rubber on the road, I don't like the increased sidewall height over the OEM 265/35.”

rdforum.org ·1 upvote ·2016-09-06

“Re: Best summer tires & Best winter tires! I run PSS on my M Roadster during the summer and do a couple of weeks each summer of some very fast paced driving with our car club on mountain roads. I have tried a number of tires over the years and PSS for me have the best balance of wet and dry traction with a great feel for how close you are to the edge of performance. I have been getting 2 years on the rear tires and 3 years on the front tires. Another brand of very good winter tire is Nokian Hakkapeliitta R2's.”

Top themes
#Dry grip and cornering#Comparison to PS4S#Poor snow performance#Tread life and wear#High purchase price#Age and cracking issues#Daily driving comfort

Based on 364 community posts

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Michelin Pilot Sport PS2 B · Michelin Pilot Super Sport
CategorySummerSummer
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover
Sizes available750
Rim diameters17″ – 540″17″ – 23″
Sizes in common22

Which one should you actually buy?

Michelin Pilot Sport PS2

Michelin Pilot Super Sport

Too close to call: Michelin Pilot Sport PS2 and Michelin Pilot Super Sport are within 2 points overall. Michelin Pilot Sport PS2 is stronger on wet. Michelin Pilot Super Sport is stronger on treadwear.

Pick tire A Your priority is wet-weather safety

Michelin Pilot Sport PS2 scores 81 vs 77 on wet.

Pick tire B You want the longest tread life

Michelin Pilot Super Sport scores 70 vs 67 on treadwear.

Tire A · Michelin Pilot Sport PS2
Tire B · Michelin Pilot Super Sport

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Pilot Sport PS2 or Pilot Super Sport?

Which is better in the wet, Pilot Sport PS2 or Pilot Super Sport?

Michelin Pilot Sport PS2, 81 vs 77 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, Pilot Sport PS2 or Pilot Super Sport?

Neither, by our numbers: 82 vs 83 on the dry score, within 3 points.

Which is more comfortable, Pilot Sport PS2 or Pilot Super Sport?

Neither, by our numbers: 76 vs 74 on the comfort score, within 3 points.

Which lasts longer, Pilot Sport PS2 or Pilot Super Sport?

Michelin Pilot Super Sport, 70 vs 67 on our treadwear score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology