Head-to-head Updated

Michelin Pilot Super Sport vs Vredestein Ultrac Sessanta — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 1 + 0 road tests and 1,507 + 237 owner reviews. How we score

Too close to call: Pilot Super Sport 78, Ultrac Sessanta 79.

Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Michelin Pilot Super Sport
± 6

Tests 75 · 1 test Owners 82 · 1,507 reviews

Best test result: #1 of 9 in 2017 Motor Mag UHP Tyre Test (dry handling)

“Damn. 295s on Style 359Ms? That's pushing it a bit, isn't it? I so desperately wish Michelin would make a 285/30 PSS. I'm running 275/35s now, and while I like the extra rubber on the road, I don't like the increased sidewall height over the OEM 265/35.”

Vredestein Ultrac Sessanta
± 8

Tests – · none yet Owners 82 · 237 reviews

“I ran Vredestein Ultrac Sessanta on my IS350 15 years ago and absolutely loved them! Unless their quality has gone down since then I I wouldn’t hesitate to run them again.”

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 82

    Dry

    Pilot Super Sport +2
    80
    Why this score
    SourcePilot Super SportUltrac Sessanta
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / – tests77≈ 76 (est.)
    Reviews found online9086

    Pilot Super Sport: 60% × 77.5 + 40% × 89.8 = 82

    Ultrac Sessanta: 60% × 75.5 (est.) + 40% × 86.2 = 80

    No road tests of dry for Ultrac Sessanta. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).

  2. 77

    Wet

    Ultrac Sessanta +6
    83
    Why this score
    SourcePilot Super SportUltrac Sessanta
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / – tests73≈ 80 (est.)
    Reviews found online8487

    Pilot Super Sport: 60% × 73 + 40% × 83.8 = 77

    Ultrac Sessanta: 60% × 79.7 (est.) + 40% × 87.1 = 83

    No road tests of wet for Ultrac Sessanta. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

  3. 74

    Comfort

    Ultrac Sessanta +3
    77
    Why this score
    SourcePilot Super SportUltrac Sessanta
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 70 (est.)≈ 71 (est.)
    Reviews found online7680

    Pilot Super Sport: 40% × 70.3 (est.) + 60% × 76.2 = 74

    Ultrac Sessanta: 40% × 71.1 (est.) + 60% × 80.2 = 77

    No road tests of comfort for Pilot Super Sport. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).

    No road tests of comfort for Ultrac Sessanta. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).

  4. 70

    Treadwear

    Ultrac Sessanta +1
    71
    Why this score
    SourcePilot Super SportUltrac Sessanta
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 69 (est.)≈ 69 (est.)
    Reviews found online7374

    Pilot Super Sport: 60% × 68.7 (est.) + 40% × 72.7 = 70

    Ultrac Sessanta: 60% × 69.1 (est.) + 40% × 73.6 = 71

    No road tests of treadwear for Pilot Super Sport. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).

    No road tests of treadwear for Ultrac Sessanta. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).

  5. 83

    Handling (owners)

    Ultrac Sessanta +1
    84
    Why this score
    SourcePilot Super SportUltrac Sessanta
    Reviews found online8384
Scores at a glance
Michelin Pilot Super Sport vs Vredestein Ultrac Sessanta: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryMichelin Pilot Super SportVredestein Ultrac Sessanta
Relative Score 78 79
Dry 82 80
Wet 77 83
Comfort 74 77
Treadwear 70 71
Handling (owners) 83 84

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score
± 6

Pilot Super Sport

± 8

Ultrac Sessanta

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Pilot Super Sport

Pros

  • Phenomenal dry grip and cornering stability
  • Precise steering response and excellent road feedback
  • Better-than-expected tread wear and mileage for a performance tire

Cons

  • Reduced grip and traction in cold weather (below 15°C)
  • Mediocre performance and tendency to aquaplane when tread wears down in heavy rain
  • High price point compared to some alternatives
All owner themes in the Pilot Super Sport review

Tire B Ultrac Sessanta

Pros

  • Exceptional wet and dry traction
  • High value-for-money ratio compared to premium competitors
  • Predictable and progressive handling characteristics

Cons

  • Inconsistent tread life, with many users reporting rapid wear
  • Increased road noise, often described as a drone or bearing-like sound
  • Poor performance in snow and icy conditions
All owner themes in the Ultrac Sessanta review

What real owners are saying

From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score

Tire A

Michelin Pilot Super Sport

Positive

The Michelin Pilot Super Sport is widely praised by the community as a benchmark high-performance street tire offering outstanding dry grip, sharp cornering capability, and decent ride comfort for daily driving. Many drivers note that its successor, the Pilot Sport 4S, improves upon it—especially in cold and wet conditions—while several users highlight downsides such as poor winter/snow capability, premium pricing, and eventual rubber degradation or tread cracking as the tires age.

bobistheoilguy.com ·2 upvotes ·2025-01-24

“I'm in rainy Seattle as well, and I find max performance summer rated tires better overall in rain than max performance all season rated tires. Not in all cases, but typically you are giving up some wet and dry traction for that snow rating. So I would recommend Michelin Pilot Sport 4S or Continental Extremecontact Sport 02 as two good examples of wet weather tires. On my E39 540 M-Sport daily driver, I run 17" staggered Continental Extremecontact Sport 02 for several years now, after running two sets of Conti DWS, then two sets of Michelin Pilot Sport Allseason 4 (or the predecessor to them). On my 2018 M550iX I am running oem Michelin Pilot Super Sport. If you must run all season, get the Michelin as they at least still have very good dry traction grip and handling traits.”

r/ft86 ·2 upvotes ·2016-04-18

“As someone who lapped the car until I destroyed the OEM tires, and then lapped a set of PSS until I destroyed those too. The PSS are stickier than stock for sure, but they arent really sticky when it comes to tires for the track. They overheat and get greasy if you drive them hard, and they will slip at just slightly higher speeds. TL;DR: they are better than stock, but they arent a track sticky tire by any means so tail happy is still a thing.”

r/BMW ·1 upvote ·2014-01-22

“Damn. 295s on Style 359Ms? That's pushing it a bit, isn't it? I so desperately wish Michelin would make a 285/30 PSS. I'm running 275/35s now, and while I like the extra rubber on the road, I don't like the increased sidewall height over the OEM 265/35.”

Top themes
#Dry grip and cornering#Comparison to PS4S#Poor snow performance#Tread life and wear#High purchase price#Age and cracking issues#Daily driving comfort

Based on 364 community posts

Tire B

Vredestein Ultrac Sessanta

Positive

Community opinion on the Vredestein Ultrac Sessanta is overwhelmingly positive, with drivers praising its high value, impressive wet and dry grip, and smooth, quiet ride compared to stiff run-flat tires. While a few noted soft sidewalls or increased noise late in the tread life, the tire developed a strong reputation for offering high-end performance at an affordable price point.

r/ZL1 ·2 upvotes ·2013-12-15

“I just had a set of Vredestein Ultrac Sessanta put on. Initial thoughts... I got them in 275/40/20 for the fronts and 315/35/20 for the rears. They fit the wheels perfectly. I immediately noticed a much softer ride. Sport Mode now feels like Tour Mode, maybe even softer. I DD my ZL1 so cold weather performance is very important. Temps were near 40°F and they stayed quite grippy. This is a huge improvement over the stock Goodyear's. Initial turn in response is good. I had the opportunity to push them on an off ramp and they felt a little mushy when pushed and didn't seem to want to exceed .75g I had a set of these on a previous car (2004 ZO6) and expect great wet weather performance. I will update this post once I get some more miles on them.”

mbworld.org

“Quote: Originally Posted by Untertürkheim Sorry, but I must disagree. I found these tires to be very bad in the rain, I ended up replacing them very early for that reason alone. That's odd. The Ultrac Sessanta? The Vreds were much better than the Conti 2 I had on my Bimmer. I live in LA, but in Pacific Palisades where we get dumps of rain often in the winter. No hydroplaning, great feeling of stability. On other forums, the Vreds are normally considered good in the wet. btw, there are 20 pages about this tire on the Corvette forum here: Here's just one quote on that long thread: "As for the RAIN.. They are insane on the rain.. no slipping, or gliding, only traction" And another: "Drove through a monsoon in Redding, CA on the way down and no hydroplaining and my buddy following me said the water seeemd to come out behind the car and not spread sideways as you normally see." I had the same experience. So, maybe they just don't work well on a MB(??)”

bobistheoilguy.com ·2018-10-27

“Originally Posted by CBR.worm I ran a couple set of the Vredestein Ultrac Sessanta tires, they were great - super sticky wet and dry and smooth. Unfortunately, they stopped making them in my size a few years ago. I was very happy with them. I know they are totally different than what you are looking at, but there isn't a lot of info out there (here in the US) about the brand. Is your tire size 235/45-18? They don't make the Sessanta in any size anymore! It is an older, now discontinued line. Vredestein does offer both the Ultrac Satin and Ultrac Vorti in your size 235/45-18”

Top themes
#Ride Comfort and Noise#Price and Value#Dry and Wet Grip#Unique Tread Pattern#Transition from Run-Flats

Based on 55 community posts

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Michelin Pilot Super Sport B · Vredestein Ultrac Sessanta
CategorySummerSummer
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover
Sizes available50—
Rim diameters17″ – 23″—
UTQG300 AA A280 AA A

Which one should you actually buy?

Michelin Pilot Super Sport

Vredestein Ultrac Sessanta

Too close to call: Michelin Pilot Super Sport and Vredestein Ultrac Sessanta are within 2 points overall. Vredestein Ultrac Sessanta is stronger on wet and comfort.

Pick tire B Your priority is wet-weather safety

Vredestein Ultrac Sessanta scores 83 vs 77 on wet.

Pick tire B You want the most comfortable ride

Vredestein Ultrac Sessanta scores 77 vs 74 on comfort.

Tire A · Michelin Pilot Super Sport
Tire B · Vredestein Ultrac Sessanta

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Pilot Super Sport or Ultrac Sessanta?

Which is better in the wet, Pilot Super Sport or Ultrac Sessanta?

Vredestein Ultrac Sessanta, 83 vs 77 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, Pilot Super Sport or Ultrac Sessanta?

Neither, by our numbers: 82 vs 80 on the dry score, within 3 points.

Which is more comfortable, Pilot Super Sport or Ultrac Sessanta?

Vredestein Ultrac Sessanta, 77 vs 74 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, Pilot Super Sport or Ultrac Sessanta?

Neither, by our numbers: 70 vs 71 on the treadwear score, within 3 points.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology