Tests – · none yet Owners 81 · 6 reviews
Michelin Power RS looks discontinued: no new owner reviews or road tests in five years and no current EU tyre label.
Head-to-head
Updated
Michelin Power GP vs Michelin Power RS — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 6 + 11 owner reviews. How we score
Power GP is ahead, 78–73
Add your size for an exact match
/R
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
80
Dry
Power GP +377Why this score
Source Power GP Power RS Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 76 (est.) ≈ 74 (est.) Reviews found online 86 82 Power GP: 60% × 75.7 (est.) + 40% × 86.2 = 80
Power RS: 60% × 74.1 (est.) + 40% × 82.3 = 77
No road tests of dry for Power GP. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).
No road tests of dry for Power RS. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).
-
77
Wet
Power GP +473Why this score
Source Power GP Power RS Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 76 (est.) ≈ 72 (est.) Reviews found online 80 74 Power GP: 60% × 75.7 (est.) + 40% × 79.7 = 77
Power RS: 60% × 72.4 (est.) + 40% × 73.8 = 73
No road tests of wet for Power GP. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
No road tests of wet for Power RS. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
-
78
Comfort
Power GP +870Why this score
Source Power GP Power RS Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 71 (est.) ≈ 69 (est.) Reviews found online 82 71 Power GP: 40% × 71.4 (est.) + 60% × 81.7 = 78
Power RS: 40% × 69.5 (est.) + 60% × 70.9 = 70
No road tests of comfort for Power GP or Power RS. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
72
Treadwear
Power GP +1062Why this score
Source Power GP Power RS Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 69 (est.) ≈ 64 (est.) Reviews found online 75 59 Power GP: 60% × 69.3 (est.) + 40% × 75.3 = 72
Power RS: 60% × 63.7 (est.) + 40% × 59.3 = 62
No road tests of treadwear for Power GP. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).
No road tests of treadwear for Power RS. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).
-
85
Handling (owners)
Power GP +481Why this score
Source Power GP Power RS Reviews found online 85 81
Scores at a glance
| Category | Michelin Power GP | Michelin Power RS |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 78 | 73 |
| Dry | 80 | 77 |
| Wet | 77 | 73 |
| Comfort | 78 | 70 |
| Treadwear | 72 | 62 |
| Handling (owners) | 85 | 81 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score
78
/ 100
Power GP
73
/ 100
Power RS
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A Power GP
Pros
- Rapid warm-up time providing immediate confidence
- Exceptional dry grip and predictable feedback
- Superior performance in damp or wet conditions compared to competitors
Cons
- Limited tread life, with some users reporting replacement intervals between 5,000 and 6,000 kilometers
- Potential for uneven wear or cupping on the tire edges
- High performance focus may not suit riders prioritizing maximum longevity
Tire B Power RS
Pros
- Exceptional dry grip and cornering stability
- High level of rider feedback and predictability at the limit
- Rapid warm-up times
Cons
- Inconsistent tread life, with some users reporting rapid center wear
- Mixed feedback regarding wet weather and cold-start confidence
- Stiffer carcass design can lead to reduced ride comfort compared to competitors
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Michelin Power GP | B · Michelin Power RS |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer | Summer |
| Vehicle type | Motorcycle | Motorcycle |
Which one should you actually buy?
78
/ 100
Michelin Power GP
73
/ 100
Michelin Power RS
Winner: Michelin Power GP — better treadwear, comfort and wet. It leads or ties in every category we score. Michelin Power GP rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 6 reviews), so read this result as provisional. Michelin Power RS rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 11 reviews), so read this result as provisional.
Pick tire A
You want the longest tread life
Michelin Power GP scores 72 vs 62 on treadwear.
Pick tire A
You want the most comfortable ride
Michelin Power GP scores 78 vs 70 on comfort.
Pick tire A
Your priority is wet-weather safety
Michelin Power GP scores 77 vs 73 on wet.
Pick tire A
You want the most grip on dry roads
Michelin Power GP scores 80 vs 77 on dry.
Tire A · Michelin Power GP
Tire B · Michelin Power RS
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Power GP or Power RS?
Which is better in the wet, Power GP or Power RS?
Michelin Power GP, 77 vs 73 on our wet score.
Which grips better on dry roads, Power GP or Power RS?
Michelin Power GP, 80 vs 77 on our dry score.
Which is more comfortable, Power GP or Power RS?
Michelin Power GP, 78 vs 70 on our comfort score.
Which lasts longer, Power GP or Power RS?
Michelin Power GP, 72 vs 62 on our treadwear score.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology